HER2 in situ hybridization test in breast cancer: quantifying margins of error and genetic heterogeneity

被引:7
|
作者
Polonia, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Caramelo, Ana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Inst Mol Pathol & Immunol, Ipatimup Diagnost, Dept Pathol, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Inst Invest & Inovacao Saude I3S, Porto, Portugal
关键词
PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; ASCO/CAP GUIDELINE; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; ISCHEMIC TIME; RECOMMENDATIONS; AMPLIFICATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; LABORATORIES;
D O I
10.1038/s41379-021-00813-x
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of counting increasing number of invasive cancer cells in the result of the HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) test in breast cancer as well as to compare two different approaches of measuring genomic heterogeneity (single cell and population based). A cohort of 100 consecutive breast cancer cases (primary and metastatic) were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification with bright-field ISH. The evaluation of the samples included scoring 20 nuclei, in five different areas, measuring the margins of error for each case. Genomic heterogeneity (GH) was defined by the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline as a discrete population of tumor cells with HER2 amplification. We also evaluated GH as single tumor cells with HER2 amplification. The stabilization of the coefficient of variation of HER2/CEP17 ratio requires about 60 invasive cancer cells. The average margin of error of HER2/CEP17 ratio and of HER2 copy number was 0.40 and 0.53, respectively, when counting 20 cells, decreasing to 0.20 and 0.26 when counting 100 cells. Population GH was observed in 1% of the cases, while single cell GH was observed in 27% of the cases, reaching its maximum value in cases near the thresholds of positivity. Therefore, margins of error in HER2 ISH test are high, and the minimal cell number recommended in current guidelines should be raised to at least 60 cells. Population GH is a rare event and single cell GH is maximal in cases near the thresholds.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1486
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of HER2 gene status in breast cancer by chromogenic in situ hybridization:: Comparison with immunohistochemistry
    Kounelis, S
    Kapranos, N
    Malamos, N
    Kouri-Bairaktari, E
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 25 (2A) : 939 - 946
  • [42] Updated HER2 In Situ Hybridization (ISH) Guidelines in Breast Cancer: Some Equivocal Findings
    Kos, Zuzana
    Craddock, Kenneth
    Berman, Hal
    Done, Susan
    Miller, Naomi
    Youngson, Bruce
    Mulligan, Anna Marie
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 : 51A - 52A
  • [43] Evaluation of HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancer Using Nuclei Microarray in Situ Hybridization
    Jiang, Huiyong
    Bai, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Cheng
    Zhang, Xuefeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2012, 13 (05) : 5519 - 5527
  • [44] Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridization with other methodologies for HER2 status assesment in breast cancer
    Hauser-Kronberger, C
    Dandachi, N
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR HISTOLOGY, 2004, 35 (06) : 647 - 653
  • [45] Updated HER2 In Situ Hybridization (ISH) Guidelines in Breast Cancer: Some Equivocal Findings
    Kos, Zuzana
    Craddock, Kenneth
    Berman, Hal
    Done, Susan
    Miller, Naomi
    Youngson, Bruce
    Mulligan, Anna Marie
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2015, 95 : 51A - 52A
  • [46] Assessing HER2 amplification in breast cancer: findings from the Australian In Situ Hybridization Program
    Bilous, Michael
    Morey, Adrienne L.
    Armes, Jane E.
    Bell, Richard
    Button, Peter H.
    Cummings, Margaret C.
    Fox, Stephen B.
    Francis, Glenn D.
    Waite, Brigid
    McCue, Glenda
    Raymond, Wendy A.
    Robbins, Peter D.
    Farshid, Gelareh
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 134 (02) : 617 - 624
  • [47] HER2 in situ hybridization analysis from 0 and 1+immunohistochemistry in breast cancer
    Heikkila, P.
    Kero, M.
    Remes, S.
    Stahls, A.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 : S56 - S57
  • [48] The spectrum of HER2 expression in breast cancer: linking immunohistochemistry quantification with in situ hybridization assay
    Polonia, Antonio
    Canelas, Carolina
    Caramelo, Ana
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2022, 480 (06) : 1171 - 1179
  • [49] HER2 status in breast carcinomas: comparison between silver in situ hybridization, chromogenic in situ hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Ali, S. A. Md
    Nurhayati, H. M.
    Munirah, M. A.
    Reena, M. Z.
    Masir, N.
    Chandramaya, S. F.
    Rohaizak, M.
    Asmiati, A.
    Sharifah, N. A.
    Rafie, M. K.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (05): : 185 - 185
  • [50] Concordance of HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Using Tissue Microarray in Breast Cancer
    Furrer, Daniela
    Jacob, Simon
    Caron, Chantal
    Sanschagrin, Francois
    Provencher, Louise
    Diorio, Caroline
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (06) : 3323 - 3329