HER2 in situ hybridization test in breast cancer: quantifying margins of error and genetic heterogeneity

被引:7
|
作者
Polonia, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Caramelo, Ana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Inst Mol Pathol & Immunol, Ipatimup Diagnost, Dept Pathol, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Inst Invest & Inovacao Saude I3S, Porto, Portugal
关键词
PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; ASCO/CAP GUIDELINE; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; ISCHEMIC TIME; RECOMMENDATIONS; AMPLIFICATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; LABORATORIES;
D O I
10.1038/s41379-021-00813-x
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of counting increasing number of invasive cancer cells in the result of the HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) test in breast cancer as well as to compare two different approaches of measuring genomic heterogeneity (single cell and population based). A cohort of 100 consecutive breast cancer cases (primary and metastatic) were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification with bright-field ISH. The evaluation of the samples included scoring 20 nuclei, in five different areas, measuring the margins of error for each case. Genomic heterogeneity (GH) was defined by the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline as a discrete population of tumor cells with HER2 amplification. We also evaluated GH as single tumor cells with HER2 amplification. The stabilization of the coefficient of variation of HER2/CEP17 ratio requires about 60 invasive cancer cells. The average margin of error of HER2/CEP17 ratio and of HER2 copy number was 0.40 and 0.53, respectively, when counting 20 cells, decreasing to 0.20 and 0.26 when counting 100 cells. Population GH was observed in 1% of the cases, while single cell GH was observed in 27% of the cases, reaching its maximum value in cases near the thresholds of positivity. Therefore, margins of error in HER2 ISH test are high, and the minimal cell number recommended in current guidelines should be raised to at least 60 cells. Population GH is a rare event and single cell GH is maximal in cases near the thresholds.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1486
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Silver-Enhanced In Situ Hybridization as an Alternative to Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Assaying HER2 Amplification in Clinical Breast Cancer
    Park, Kyeongmee
    Han, Sehwan
    Kim, Jung-Yeon
    Kim, Hyun-Jung
    Kwon, Ji Eun
    Gwak, Geumhee
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2011, 14 (04) : 276 - 282
  • [32] Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) for assessment of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer
    Bhargava, R
    Lal, P
    Salazar, PA
    Chen, B
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2004, 6 (02): : 151 - 151
  • [33] SILVER-ENHANCED IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION FOR ASSAYING HER2 AMPLIFICATION IN CLINICAL BREAST CANCER
    Han, S.
    Kim, J. S.
    Gwak, G.
    Park, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 29 - 29
  • [34] Predictive Value of HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Result in HER2 Positive Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy
    Zhao, Jing
    Suo, Aili
    Zhang, Chao
    Shi, Quiying
    Wei, Zhimin
    Li, Zaibo
    Li, Xiaoxian
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32
  • [35] Predictive Value of HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Result in HER2 Positive Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy
    Zhao, Jing
    Suo, Aili
    Zhang, Chao
    Shi, Qiuying
    Wei, Zhimin
    Li, Zaibo
    Li, Xiaoxian
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [36] A study on the prevalence of HER2 genetic heterogeneity and its impact on breast cancer survival
    Ho, Jingshan
    Chan, Daniel Boon Yeow
    Lee, Soo-Chin
    Koay, Evelyn S. C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [37] HER2 Testing for Breast Cancer in the Genomics Laboratory A Sea Change for Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
    Geiersbach, Katherine B.
    Sill, Daniel R.
    Meyer, Reid G.
    Yuhas, Jason A.
    Sukov, William R.
    Mounajjed, Taofic
    Carter, Jodi M.
    Jenkins, Robert B.
    Chen, Beiyun
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 145 (07) : 883 - 886
  • [38] Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridization with other methodologies for HER2 status assesment in breast cancer
    Cornelia Hauser-kronberger
    Nadia Dandachi
    Journal of Molecular Histology, 2004, 35 (6) : 647 - 653
  • [39] Assessing HER2 amplification in breast cancer: findings from the Australian In Situ Hybridization Program
    Michael Bilous
    Adrienne L. Morey
    Jane E. Armes
    Richard Bell
    Peter H. Button
    Margaret C. Cummings
    Stephen B. Fox
    Glenn D. Francis
    Brigid Waite
    Glenda McCue
    Wendy A. Raymond
    Peter D. Robbins
    Gelareh Farshid
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012, 134 : 617 - 624
  • [40] The spectrum of HER2 expression in breast cancer: linking immunohistochemistry quantification with in situ hybridization assay
    António Polónia
    Carolina Canelas
    Ana Caramelo
    Virchows Archiv, 2022, 480 : 1171 - 1179