Dosimetric guidance on using brachytherapy (LDR or HDR) to offset a flawed permanent prostate implant

被引:0
|
作者
Zaider, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2760839
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To provide practical dosimetric advice on mending suboptimal permanent implants using low dose‐rate (LDR) or high dose‐rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT). The problem is to make the combination of the two radiation treatments (the initial, flawed one and the compensatory boost) clinically isoeffective with the planned dose. Methods: The device of isoeffective dose (IED) is the appropriate tool for this purpose as it accounts for the physical (temporal distribution of dose) and biological (radiosensitivity, repair kinetics, proliferation rate) treatment setting. Results: I give, as a function of separation time from the initial, flawed treatment, and stratified by risk group representative values for the additional dose (LDR or HDR) needed to make the combined treatment isoeffective with a prescription of 144 Gy of permanently‐implanted [formula omitted] seeds. Conclusions: While the IED concept, within the constraints stated in the presentation, is rigorously valid, its practical implementation depends importantly on the relevant radiobiological parameters, and in this respect the reader is urged to use his own critical judgment. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2442 / 2442
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric guidance on using brachytherapy (low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate) to offset a flawed permanent prostate implant
    Zaider, Marco
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2009, 8 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [2] Dosimetry comparison between HDR and permanent implant prostate brachytherapy
    Wang, X
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1881 - 1881
  • [3] DOSIMETRIC OPTIONS AND POSSIBILITIES OF PROSTATE LDR BRACHYTHERAPY WITH PERMANENT I-125 IMPLANTS
    Ivanauskas, Andrius
    Aleknavicius, Eduardas
    Burneckis, Arvydas
    Miller, Albert
    MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE BALTIC STATES, 2011, : 98 - 101
  • [4] Dosimetric Evaluation of an Adaptive Planning Strategy for Implant Shift in HDR Prostate Brachytherapy
    Wallace, Jordan
    Hanlon, Maximilian
    Smith, Ryan L.
    Franich, Rick
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D DOSIMETRY, IC3DDOSE 2024, 2024, 2799
  • [5] The use of nomograms in LDR-HDR prostate brachytherapy
    Carmen Pujades, Ma
    Camacho, Cristina
    Perez-Calatayud, Jose
    Richart, Jose
    Gimeno, Jose
    Lliso, Francoise
    Carmona, Vicente
    Ballester, Facundo
    Crispin, Vicente
    Rodriguez, Silvia
    Tormo, Alejandro
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2011, 3 (03) : 121 - 124
  • [6] Dosimetric Comparison of LDR Vs. HDR Tandem Ovoid Brachytherapy
    Li, W.
    Liu, L.
    Tanny, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [7] DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION AT 01 AND 030 FOR PERMANENT IMPLANT BRACHYTHERAPY IN PROSTATE CANCER
    Horn, S.
    Lacornerie, T.
    Cheval, V.
    Bonodeau, F.
    Nickers, P.
    Lartigau, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S212 - S212
  • [8] Prostate brachytherapy: HDR or seed implant
    Das, K. R.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 31 (04) : 239 - 241
  • [9] Evaluation of Post-Implant Dosimetry in LDR Permanent Interstitial Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer
    Khouj, Y.
    Harris, T.
    O'Farrell, D.
    Sugar, E. Neubauer
    Nguyen, P.
    Orio, P.
    King, M.
    Buzurovic, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [10] Audit of transperineal low dose rate (LDR) permanent prostate brachytherapy implant quality
    Mooney, L.
    Mitchell, D.
    Napier, E.
    Badusha, A.
    Jain, S.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 27 : S7 - S7