Meeting Europe's climate change commitments: quantitative estimates of the potential for carbon mitigation by agriculture

被引:266
|
作者
Smith, P [1 ]
Powlson, DS [1 ]
Smith, JU [1 ]
Falloon, P [1 ]
Coleman, K [1 ]
机构
[1] AFRC, Inst Arable Crops Res, Dept Soil Sci, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England
关键词
agriculture; bioenergy crops; carbon mitigation; carbon sequestration; climate change; Europe; Kyoto Protocol Article 3.4; land management; soil organic carbon; soil organic matter;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00331.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Under the Kyoto Protocol, the European Union is committed to a reduction in CO2 emissions to 92% of baseline (1990) levels during the first commitment period (2008-2012). The Kyoto Protocol allows carbon emissions to be offset by demonstrable removal of carbon from the atmosphere. Thus, land-use/land-management change and forestry activities that are shown to reduce atmospheric CO2 levels can be included in the Kyoto targets. These activities include afforestation, reforestation and deforestation (article 3.3 of the Kyoto Protocol) and the improved management of agricultural soils (article 3.4). In this paper, we estimate the carbon mitigation potential of various agricultural land-management strategies and examine the consequences of European policy options on carbon mitigation potential, by examining combinations of changes in agricultural land-use/land-management. We show that no single land-management change in isolation can mitigate all of the carbon needed to meet Europe's climate change commitments, but integrated combinations of land-management strategies show considerable potential for carbon mitigation. Three of the combined scenarios, one of which is an optimal realistic scenario, are by themselves able to meet Europe's emission limitation or reduction commitments. Through combined land-management scenarios, we show that the most important resource for carbon mitigation in agriculture is the surplus arable land. We conclude that in order to fully exploit the potential of arable land for carbon mitigation, policies will need to be implemented to allow surplus arable land to be put into alternative long-term land-use. Of all options examined, bioenergy crops show the greatest potential for carbon mitigation. Bioenergy crop production also shows an indefinite mitigation potential compared to other options where the mitigation potential is finite. We suggest that in order to exploit fully the bioenergy option, the infrastructure for bioenergy production needs to be significantly enhanced before the beginning of the first Kyoto commitment period in 2008. It is not expected that Europe will attempt to meet its climate change commitments solely through changes in agricultural land-use. A reduction in CO2-carbon emissions will be key to meeting Europe's Kyoto targets, and forestry activities (Kyoto Article 3.3) will play a major role. In this study, however, we demonstrate the considerable potential of changes in agricultural land-use and -management (Kyoto Article 3.4) for carbon mitigation and highlight the policies needed to promote these agricultural activities. As all sources of carbon mitigation will be important in meeting Europe's climate change commitments, agricultural carbon mitigation options should be taken very seriously.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 539
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Climate Change Mitigation in Agriculture beyond 2030: Options for Carbon Pricing and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms
    Spiegel, Alisa
    Heidecke, Claudia
    Gabela, Julio G. Fournier
    Stepanyan, Davit
    Soeder, Mareike
    Freund, Florian
    Gocht, Alexander
    Banse, Martin
    Osterburg, Bernhard
    [J]. EUROCHOICES, 2024, 23 (01) : 19 - 27
  • [42] An Overview of Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture and Their Mitigation Strategies
    Bibi, Farhana
    Rahman, Azizur
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [43] CORRESPONDENCE: No-till agriculture and climate change mitigation
    Neufeldt, Henry
    Kissinger, Gabrielle
    Alcamo, Joseph
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 5 (06) : 488 - 489
  • [44] Reply to 'No-till agriculture and climate change mitigation'
    David S. Powlson
    Clare M. Stirling
    M. L. Jat
    Bruno G. Gerard
    Cheryl A. Palm
    Pedro A. Sanchez
    Kenneth G. Cassman
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5 : 489 - 489
  • [45] Climate change mitigation opportunities based on carbon footprint estimates of dietary patterns in Peru
    Vazquez-Rowe, Ian
    Larrea-Gallegos, Gustavo
    Villanueva-Rey, Pedro
    Gilardino, Alessandro
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (11):
  • [46] Reply to 'No-till agriculture and climate change mitigation'
    Powlson, David S.
    Stirling, Clare M.
    Jat, M. L.
    Gerard, Bruno G.
    Palm, Cheryl A.
    Sanchez, Pedro A.
    Cassman, Kenneth G.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 5 (06) : 489 - 489
  • [47] Climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture: the case of the olive
    Montanaro, G.
    Nuzzo, V
    Xiloyannis, C.
    Dichio, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 9 (04) : 633 - 642
  • [48] Conservation agriculture as a climate change mitigation strategy in Zimbabwe
    O'Dell, Deb
    Eash, Neal S.
    Hicks, Bruce B.
    Oetting, Joel N.
    Sauer, Thomas J.
    Lambert, Dayton M.
    Thierfelder, Christian
    Muoni, Tarirai
    Logan, Joanne
    Zahn, James A.
    Goddard, John J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 18 (03) : 250 - 265
  • [49] Climate Change Impacts and Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation in Agriculture
    McCarl, Bruce A.
    Yu, Chin-Hsien
    Attavanich, Witsanu
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (05)
  • [50] THE ROLE OF CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE IN MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    Jug, D.
    Jug, I
    Brozovic, B.
    Vukadinovic, V.
    Stipesevic, B.
    Durdevic, B.
    [J]. POLJOPRIVREDA, 2018, 24 (01): : 35 - 44