Meeting Europe's climate change commitments: quantitative estimates of the potential for carbon mitigation by agriculture

被引:266
|
作者
Smith, P [1 ]
Powlson, DS [1 ]
Smith, JU [1 ]
Falloon, P [1 ]
Coleman, K [1 ]
机构
[1] AFRC, Inst Arable Crops Res, Dept Soil Sci, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England
关键词
agriculture; bioenergy crops; carbon mitigation; carbon sequestration; climate change; Europe; Kyoto Protocol Article 3.4; land management; soil organic carbon; soil organic matter;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00331.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Under the Kyoto Protocol, the European Union is committed to a reduction in CO2 emissions to 92% of baseline (1990) levels during the first commitment period (2008-2012). The Kyoto Protocol allows carbon emissions to be offset by demonstrable removal of carbon from the atmosphere. Thus, land-use/land-management change and forestry activities that are shown to reduce atmospheric CO2 levels can be included in the Kyoto targets. These activities include afforestation, reforestation and deforestation (article 3.3 of the Kyoto Protocol) and the improved management of agricultural soils (article 3.4). In this paper, we estimate the carbon mitigation potential of various agricultural land-management strategies and examine the consequences of European policy options on carbon mitigation potential, by examining combinations of changes in agricultural land-use/land-management. We show that no single land-management change in isolation can mitigate all of the carbon needed to meet Europe's climate change commitments, but integrated combinations of land-management strategies show considerable potential for carbon mitigation. Three of the combined scenarios, one of which is an optimal realistic scenario, are by themselves able to meet Europe's emission limitation or reduction commitments. Through combined land-management scenarios, we show that the most important resource for carbon mitigation in agriculture is the surplus arable land. We conclude that in order to fully exploit the potential of arable land for carbon mitigation, policies will need to be implemented to allow surplus arable land to be put into alternative long-term land-use. Of all options examined, bioenergy crops show the greatest potential for carbon mitigation. Bioenergy crop production also shows an indefinite mitigation potential compared to other options where the mitigation potential is finite. We suggest that in order to exploit fully the bioenergy option, the infrastructure for bioenergy production needs to be significantly enhanced before the beginning of the first Kyoto commitment period in 2008. It is not expected that Europe will attempt to meet its climate change commitments solely through changes in agricultural land-use. A reduction in CO2-carbon emissions will be key to meeting Europe's Kyoto targets, and forestry activities (Kyoto Article 3.3) will play a major role. In this study, however, we demonstrate the considerable potential of changes in agricultural land-use and -management (Kyoto Article 3.4) for carbon mitigation and highlight the policies needed to promote these agricultural activities. As all sources of carbon mitigation will be important in meeting Europe's climate change commitments, agricultural carbon mitigation options should be taken very seriously.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 539
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation
    Joeri Rogelj
    David L. McCollum
    Andy Reisinger
    Malte Meinshausen
    Keywan Riahi
    [J]. Nature, 2013, 493 : 79 - 83
  • [32] Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems and Its Potential in Climate Change Mitigation
    Bhoomika Ghale
    Esha Mitra
    Harsimran Singh Sodhi
    Amit Kumar Verma
    Sandeep Kumar
    [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2022, 233
  • [33] Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems and Its Potential in Climate Change Mitigation
    Ghale, Bhoomika
    Mitra, Esha
    Sodhi, Harsimran Singh
    Verma, Amit Kumar
    Kumar, Sandeep
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2022, 233 (07):
  • [34] Agriculture's likely role in meeting Canada's Kyoto commitments
    Weersink, A
    Pannell, D
    Fulton, M
    Meyer-Aurich, A
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2005, 53 (04): : 425 - 441
  • [35] Climate change mitigation: potential benefits and pitfalls of enhanced rock weathering in tropical agriculture
    Edwards, David P.
    Lim, Felix
    James, Rachael H.
    Pearce, Christopher R.
    Scholes, Julie
    Freckleton, Robert P.
    Beerling, David J.
    [J]. BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 13 (04)
  • [36] Climate change mitigation potential of carbon capture and utilization in the chemical industry
    Kaetelhoen, Arne
    Meys, Raoul
    Deutz, Sarah
    Suh, Sangwon
    Bardow, Andre
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (23) : 11187 - 11194
  • [37] Dynamics and climate change mitigation potential of soil organic carbon sequestration
    Sommer, Rolf
    Bossio, Deborah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 144 : 83 - 87
  • [38] Do Voters Support Local Commitments for Climate Change Mitigation in Italy?
    Martelli, Simone
    Janssens-Maenhout, Greet
    Paruolo, Paolo
    Brechet, Thierry
    Strobl, Eric
    Guizzardi, Diego
    Cerutti, Alessandro K.
    Iancu, Andreea
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 144 : 27 - 35
  • [39] Global potential and limits of mangrove blue carbon for climate change mitigation
    Zeng, Yiwen
    Friess, Daniel A.
    Sarira, Tasya Vadya
    Siman, Kelly
    Koh, Lian Pin
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (08) : 1737 - +
  • [40] Climate change commitments and agriculture sectoral strategies in Cameroon: Interplay and perspectives
    Chia, Eugene L.
    Kankeu, Sufo R.
    Hubert, Didier
    [J]. COGENT ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 5 (01):