Meeting Europe's climate change commitments: quantitative estimates of the potential for carbon mitigation by agriculture

被引:266
|
作者
Smith, P [1 ]
Powlson, DS [1 ]
Smith, JU [1 ]
Falloon, P [1 ]
Coleman, K [1 ]
机构
[1] AFRC, Inst Arable Crops Res, Dept Soil Sci, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England
关键词
agriculture; bioenergy crops; carbon mitigation; carbon sequestration; climate change; Europe; Kyoto Protocol Article 3.4; land management; soil organic carbon; soil organic matter;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00331.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Under the Kyoto Protocol, the European Union is committed to a reduction in CO2 emissions to 92% of baseline (1990) levels during the first commitment period (2008-2012). The Kyoto Protocol allows carbon emissions to be offset by demonstrable removal of carbon from the atmosphere. Thus, land-use/land-management change and forestry activities that are shown to reduce atmospheric CO2 levels can be included in the Kyoto targets. These activities include afforestation, reforestation and deforestation (article 3.3 of the Kyoto Protocol) and the improved management of agricultural soils (article 3.4). In this paper, we estimate the carbon mitigation potential of various agricultural land-management strategies and examine the consequences of European policy options on carbon mitigation potential, by examining combinations of changes in agricultural land-use/land-management. We show that no single land-management change in isolation can mitigate all of the carbon needed to meet Europe's climate change commitments, but integrated combinations of land-management strategies show considerable potential for carbon mitigation. Three of the combined scenarios, one of which is an optimal realistic scenario, are by themselves able to meet Europe's emission limitation or reduction commitments. Through combined land-management scenarios, we show that the most important resource for carbon mitigation in agriculture is the surplus arable land. We conclude that in order to fully exploit the potential of arable land for carbon mitigation, policies will need to be implemented to allow surplus arable land to be put into alternative long-term land-use. Of all options examined, bioenergy crops show the greatest potential for carbon mitigation. Bioenergy crop production also shows an indefinite mitigation potential compared to other options where the mitigation potential is finite. We suggest that in order to exploit fully the bioenergy option, the infrastructure for bioenergy production needs to be significantly enhanced before the beginning of the first Kyoto commitment period in 2008. It is not expected that Europe will attempt to meet its climate change commitments solely through changes in agricultural land-use. A reduction in CO2-carbon emissions will be key to meeting Europe's Kyoto targets, and forestry activities (Kyoto Article 3.3) will play a major role. In this study, however, we demonstrate the considerable potential of changes in agricultural land-use and -management (Kyoto Article 3.4) for carbon mitigation and highlight the policies needed to promote these agricultural activities. As all sources of carbon mitigation will be important in meeting Europe's climate change commitments, agricultural carbon mitigation options should be taken very seriously.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 539
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meeting the UK's climate change commitments: options for carbon mitigation on agricultural land
    Smith, P
    Powlson, DS
    Smith, JU
    Falloon, P
    Coleman, K
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 16 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [2] Agriculture and climate change: Potential for mitigation in Spain
    Albiac, Jose
    Kahil, Taher
    Notivol, Eduardo
    Calvo, Elena
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 592 : 495 - 502
  • [3] Climate change mitigation and agriculture
    Vandermeer, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2013, 40 (03): : 601 - 602
  • [4] Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation
    Powlson, David S.
    Stirling, Clare M.
    Jat, M. L.
    Gerard, Bruno G.
    Palm, Cheryl A.
    Sanchez, Pedro A.
    Cassman, Kenneth G.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 4 (08) : 678 - 683
  • [5] Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation
    Powlson D.S.
    Stirling C.M.
    Jat M.L.
    Gerard B.G.
    Palm C.A.
    Sanchez P.A.
    Cassman K.G.
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4 (8) : 678 - 683
  • [6] Aligning carbon targets for construction with (inter)national climate change mitigation commitments
    Giesekam, Jannik
    Tingley, Danielle Densley
    Cotton, Isabel
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 165 : 106 - 117
  • [7] Climate Change Mitigation: The Role of Agriculture
    Obiora, C. J.
    Madukwe, M. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION, 2011, 15 (01): : 51 - 63
  • [8] Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in Agriculture
    CHEN Zhuochun School of Management
    [J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University(English Edition), 2009, 16 (04) : 70 - 77
  • [9] Climate Change and Agriculture: Mitigation and Adaptation
    Neeteson, J. J.
    Verhagen, A.
    [J]. IV INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ECOLOGICALLY SOUND FERTILIZATION STRATEGIES FOR FIELD VEGETABLE PRODUCTION, 2010, 852 : 19 - 26
  • [10] Peatlands for climate change mitigation in agriculture
    Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus
    Zak, Dominik
    Olesen, Jorgen Eivind
    [J]. BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2024, 167 (04) : 321 - 326