Inadvertent QRS prolongation by an optimization device-based algorithm in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Sedlacek, Kamil [1 ,2 ]
Polasek, Rostislav [3 ]
Jansova, Helena [4 ]
Grieco, Domenico [5 ]
Kucera, Pavel [3 ]
Kautzner, Josef [4 ]
Francis, Darrel P. [6 ]
Wichterle, Dan [4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med Cardiol & Angiol 1, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
[3] Liberec Reg Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Liberec, Czech Republic
[4] Inst Clin & Expt Med, Dept Cardiol, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Policlin Casilino Rome, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Rome, Italy
[6] Imperial Coll London, Hammersmith Hosp, Int Ctr Circulatory Hlth, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
[7] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Internal Cardiovasc Med 2, Prague, Czech Republic
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 09期
关键词
HEART-FAILURE; DELAY OPTIMIZATION; ATRIOVENTRICULAR DELAY; INTERVAL; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0275276
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Device-based algorithms offer the potential for automated optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but the process for accepting them into clinical use is currently still ad-hoc, rather than based on pre-clinical and clinical testing of specific features of validity. We investigated how the QuickOpt-guided VV delay (VVD) programming performs against the clinical and engineering heuristic of QRS complex shortening by CRT. Methods A prospective, 2-center study enrolled 37 consecutive patients with CRT. QRS complex duration (QRSd) was assessed during intrinsic atrioventricular conduction, synchronous biventricular pacing, and biventricular pacing with QuickOpt-proposed VVD. The measurements were done manually by electronic calipers in signal-averaged and magnified 12-lead QRS complexes. Results Native QRSd was 174 +/- 22 ms. Biventricular pacing with empiric AVD and synchronous VVD resulted in QRSd 156 +/- 20 ms, a significant narrowing from the baseline QRSd by 17 +/- 27 ms, P = 0.0003. In 36 of 37 patients, the QuickOpt algorithm recommended left ventricular preexcitation with VVD of 42 +/- 18 ms (median 40 ms; interquartile range 30-55 ms, P < 0.00001). QRSd in biventricular pacing with QuickOpt-based VVD was significantly longer compared with synchronous biventricular pacing (168 +/- 25 ms vs. 156 +/- 20 ms; difference 12 +/- 11ms; P < 0.00001). This prolongation correlated with the absolute VVD value (R = 0.66, P < 0.00001). Conclusions QuickOpt algorithm systematically favours a left-preexcitation VVD which translates into a significant prolongation of the QRSd compared to synchronous biventricular pacing. There is no reason to believe that a manipulation that systematically widens QRSd should be considered to optimize physiology. Device-based CRT optimization algorithms should undergo systematic mechanistic pre-clinical evaluation in various scenarios before they are tested in large clinical studies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of a Device-Based Continuous Optimization Algorithm for Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Ueda, Nobuhiko
    Noda, Takashi
    Ishibashi, Kohei
    Nakajima, Kenzaburo
    Kataoka, Naoya
    Kamakura, Tsukasa
    Wada, Mitsuru
    Yamagata, Kenichiro
    Inoue, Yuko
    Miyamoto, Koji
    Nagase, Satoshi
    Aiba, Takeshi
    Kanzaki, Hideaki
    Izumi, Chisato
    Noguchi, Teruo
    Yasuda, Satoshi
    Kusano, Kengo
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2020, 84 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [2] The efficacy of a new device-based continuous optimization algorithm for mildly wide QRS and non-CLBBB patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Ueda, N.
    Noda, T.
    Kamakura, T.
    Wada, M.
    Yamagata, K.
    Ishibashi, K.
    Inoue, Y.
    Miyamoto, K.
    Nagase, S.
    Aiba, T.
    Izumi, C.
    Noguchi, T.
    Yasuda, S.
    Kusano, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 422 - 422
  • [3] Usefulness of Hemodynamic Device-Based Optimization in Heterogeneous Patients Implanted with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator
    Gregorio Covino
    Mario Volpicelli
    Carmine Ciardiello
    Paolo Capogrosso
    Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, 2020, 13 : 938 - 943
  • [4] Usefulness of Hemodynamic Device-Based Optimization in Heterogeneous Patients Implanted with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator
    Covino, Gregorio
    Volpicelli, Mario
    Ciardiello, Carmine
    Capogrosso, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (06) : 938 - 943
  • [5] Novel Device-Based Algorithm Provides Optimal Hemodynamics During Exercise in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Kasagawa, Akira
    Nakajima, Ikutaro
    Izumo, Masaki
    Nakayama, Yui
    Yamada, Marika
    Takano, Makoto
    Matsuda, Hisao
    Furukawa, Toshiyuki
    Miyazaki, Hidekazu
    Harada, Tomoo
    Akashi, Yoshihiro J.
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2019, 83 (10) : 2002 - 2009
  • [6] Device-based intrathoracic impedance measurements in patients after cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Buschler, H.
    Lamp, B.
    Vogt, J.
    Heintze, J.
    Dorszewski, A.
    Hoppe, C.
    Horstkotte, D.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 193 - 194
  • [7] Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Device-based medicine for heart failure
    Philippon, F
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2004, 19 (03) : 270 - 274
  • [8] Resynchronization: Considering Device-Based Cardiac Therapy in Older Adults
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    Reynolds, Matthew R.
    Mitchell, Susan L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2013, 61 (04) : 615 - 621
  • [9] Clinical implication of device-based algorithm that optimize atrioventricular delay during cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Kataoka, Naoya
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2023, 38 (07) : 997 - 997
  • [10] Clinical implication of device-based algorithm that optimize atrioventricular delay during cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Naoya Kataoka
    Teruhiko Imamura
    Heart and Vessels, 2023, 38 : 997 - 997