Radioembolization for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Review of Safety, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 Imaging Response and Survival

被引:22
|
作者
Swinburne, Nathaniel C. [1 ]
Biederman, Derek M. [1 ]
Besa, Cecilia [2 ]
Tabori, Nora E. [3 ]
Fischman, Aaron M. [3 ]
Patel, Rahul S. [3 ]
Nowakowski, Francis Scott [3 ]
Gunasekaran, Ganesh [4 ]
Schwartz, Myron E. [4 ]
Lookstein, Robert A. [3 ]
Kim, Edward [3 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, Div Body Imaging, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, Div Intervent Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Liver Surg, Recanati Miller Transplantat Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; radioembolization; RECIST; yttrium-90; BILIARY-TRACT CANCER; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; Y-90; RADIOEMBOLIZATION; (90)YTTRIUM MICROSPHERES; PREDICT SURVIVAL; UNITED-STATES; RECIST; THERAPY; BRACHYTHERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1089/cbr.2017.2189
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The optimal palliative treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains controversial. While selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 microspheres is a well-accepted treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, data related to its use for locally advanced ICC remain relatively scarce. Twenty-nine patients (mean age 66 +/- 11 years; 15 female) with unresectable biopsy-proven ICC treated with SIRT between June 2008 and April 2015 were retrospectively evaluated for post-treatment toxicity, overall survival, and imaging response using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. RECIST 1.1 response was evaluable following 26 treatments [complete response (CR):0, partial response (PR):3; stable disease (SD):16, progression of disease (PD):7]. Objective response rate (CR+PR) was 12%. Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 73%. Median time to progression was 5.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0-12.0] months. Median survival following SIRT was 9.1 (95% CI: 1.7-16.4) months. Post-treatment survival was prolonged in patients with absence of extrahepatic disease (p=0.03) and correlated with RECIST 1.1 response (p=0.02). Toxicities were limited to grade I severity and occurred following 27% of treatments. These findings support the safe, effective use of SIRT for unresectable ICC. Post-treatment survival is prolonged in patients with absence of extrahepatic disease at baseline. RECIST 1.1 response following SIRT for ICC is predictive of survival.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 168
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal Lesion Number for Evaluation of Tumor Response in Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Reply
    Hillman, Shauna L.
    Sargent, Daniel J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (10) : E161 - E161
  • [32] Comparison of Choi criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with glass-microspheres Yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT)
    Beuzit, Luc
    Edeline, Julien
    Brun, Vanessa
    Ronot, Maxime
    Guillygomarc'h, Anne
    Boudjema, Karim
    Gandon, Yves
    Garin, Etienne
    Rolland, Yan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (08) : 1445 - 1452
  • [33] A Radiologist's Guide to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
    Lalchandani, Usha R.
    Sahai, Vaibhav
    Hersberger, Katherine
    Francis, Isaac R.
    Wasnik, Ashish P.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (06) : 576 - 585
  • [34] Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST): New guidelines
    Tsuchida, Y
    Therasse, P
    MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 37 (01): : 1 - 3
  • [35] Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors is superior to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors for assessment of responses to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma Cancer
    Takada J.
    Hidaka H.
    Nakazawa T.
    Kondo M.
    Numata K.
    Tanaka K.
    Matsunaga K.
    Okuse C.
    Kobayashi S.
    Morimoto M.
    Ohkawa S.
    Koizumi W.
    BMC Research Notes, 8 (1)
  • [36] Role of noninvasive imaging in the evaluation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: from diagnosis and prognosis to treatment response
    Li, Qian
    Che, Feng
    Wei, Yi
    Jiang, Han-Yu
    Zhang, Yun
    Song, Bin
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 15 (11) : 1267 - 1279
  • [37] Analysis of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors reduction ratio of primary chemotherapy in unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer
    Kawagoe, Shiho
    Nakano, Masahiro
    Uchino, Keita
    Arimizu, Kohei
    Kajitani, Tatsuhiro
    Shimokawa, Hozumi
    Kusumoto, Tetsuya
    Ikejiri, Koji
    Baba, Eishi
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 11 (03) : 243 - 251
  • [38] Importance of Volumetric Measurement Processes in Oncology Imaging Trials for Screening and Evaluation of Tumors as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
    Vemuri, Ravi Chandra
    Jarecha, Rudresh
    Hwi, Kim Kah
    Gundamaraju, Rohit
    MaruthiKanth, Aripaka
    Kulkarni, AravindRao
    Reddy, Sundeep
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (05) : 2375 - 2378
  • [39] Revised modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma (version 1.1) (vol 13, pg 1012, 2018)
    Armato, S. G., III
    Nowak, A. K.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (03) : 560 - 560
  • [40] PET/CT evaluation of response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST)
    Ding, Qiyong
    Cheng, Xu
    Yang, Lu
    Zhang, Qingbo
    Chen, Jianwei
    Li, Tiannv
    Shi, Haibin
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2014, 6 (06) : 677 - 683