Radioembolization for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Review of Safety, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 Imaging Response and Survival

被引:22
|
作者
Swinburne, Nathaniel C. [1 ]
Biederman, Derek M. [1 ]
Besa, Cecilia [2 ]
Tabori, Nora E. [3 ]
Fischman, Aaron M. [3 ]
Patel, Rahul S. [3 ]
Nowakowski, Francis Scott [3 ]
Gunasekaran, Ganesh [4 ]
Schwartz, Myron E. [4 ]
Lookstein, Robert A. [3 ]
Kim, Edward [3 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, Div Body Imaging, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, Div Intervent Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Liver Surg, Recanati Miller Transplantat Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; radioembolization; RECIST; yttrium-90; BILIARY-TRACT CANCER; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; Y-90; RADIOEMBOLIZATION; (90)YTTRIUM MICROSPHERES; PREDICT SURVIVAL; UNITED-STATES; RECIST; THERAPY; BRACHYTHERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1089/cbr.2017.2189
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The optimal palliative treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains controversial. While selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 microspheres is a well-accepted treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, data related to its use for locally advanced ICC remain relatively scarce. Twenty-nine patients (mean age 66 +/- 11 years; 15 female) with unresectable biopsy-proven ICC treated with SIRT between June 2008 and April 2015 were retrospectively evaluated for post-treatment toxicity, overall survival, and imaging response using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. RECIST 1.1 response was evaluable following 26 treatments [complete response (CR):0, partial response (PR):3; stable disease (SD):16, progression of disease (PD):7]. Objective response rate (CR+PR) was 12%. Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 73%. Median time to progression was 5.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0-12.0] months. Median survival following SIRT was 9.1 (95% CI: 1.7-16.4) months. Post-treatment survival was prolonged in patients with absence of extrahepatic disease (p=0.03) and correlated with RECIST 1.1 response (p=0.02). Toxicities were limited to grade I severity and occurred following 27% of treatments. These findings support the safe, effective use of SIRT for unresectable ICC. Post-treatment survival is prolonged in patients with absence of extrahepatic disease at baseline. RECIST 1.1 response following SIRT for ICC is predictive of survival.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 168
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The components of progression as explanatory variables for overall survival in the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 database
    Litiere, Saskia
    de Vries, Elisabeth G. E.
    Seymour, Lesley
    Sargent, Dan
    Shankar, Lalitha
    Bogaerts, Jan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (10) : 1847 - 1853
  • [22] Will there be resistance to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)?
    Gehan, EA
    Tefft, MC
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (03): : 179 - 181
  • [23] The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors: until when?
    Nannini, Margherita
    Pantaleo, Maria Abbondanz
    Maleddu, Alessandra
    Al-Nahhas, Adil
    Rubello, Domenico
    Fanti, Stefano
    Biasco, Guido
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 30 (03) : 185 - 187
  • [24] Response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) to imatinib by Choi criteria and response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) as surrogates for survival and time to progression.
    Benjamin, R. S.
    Choi, H.
    Macapinlac, H. A.
    Burgess, M. A.
    Patel, S. R.
    Chen, L. L.
    Podoloff, D. A.
    Chuslip, C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 521S - 521S
  • [25] Optimal Lesion Number for Evaluation of Tumor Response in Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
    Rosen, Mark A.
    Sullivan, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (10) : E159 - E160
  • [26] Evaluation of response to stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors
    Han, Jixia
    Song, Qi
    Guo, Feng
    Du, Rui
    Fang, Henghu
    Kang, Jingbo
    Lu, Zejun
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 43 (06) : 717 - 724
  • [27] RECIST (Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) applied to response in lymphoma.
    Assouline, S
    Eisenhauer, E
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 584S - 584S
  • [28] Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor 1.0 with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor 1.1 on MRI in Advanced Breast Cancer Response Evaluation to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Jeh, Su Kyung
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 14 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [29] Comparison of PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer
    Yanagawa, Masahiro
    Tatsumi, Mitsuaki
    Morii, Eiichi
    Watabe, Tadashi
    Isohashi, Kayako
    Kato, Hiroki
    Okusu, Ikuko
    Shimosegawa, Eku
    Tomiyama, Noriyuki
    Hatazawa, Jun
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52
  • [30] Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) for response evaluation of the neck after chemoradiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Kishikawa, Toshihiro
    Suzuki, Motoyuki
    Takemoto, Norihiko
    Fukusumi, Takahito
    Michiba, Takahiro
    Hanamoto, Atsushi
    Tanaka, Hidenori
    Tatsumi, Mitsuaki
    Isohashi, Fumiaki
    Seo, Yuji
    Tamari, Keisuke
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    Inohara, Hidenori
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2021, 43 (04): : 1184 - 1193