The sedative effects of the intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing surgeries compared to other sedation methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:33
|
作者
Kim, Hyun Jung [1 ]
Shin, Woo Jong [2 ]
Park, Suin [2 ]
Ahn, Hyeong Sik [1 ]
Oh, Jae Hoon [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Intranasal; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trials; Sedation; Systematic review; ORAL MIDAZOLAM; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREMEDICATION; ANESTHESIA; KETAMINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.01.014
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: Administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation is comfortable and effective in children who are afraid of needles, and it offers efficient sedation similar to that of intravenous administration. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical effects of the pre-procedural administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine. Design: We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intranasal dexmedetomidine administration to other administration methods of various sedatives or placebo from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, KoreaMed and hand searches of trial registries. Setting: Pediatrics who underwent interventional procedures and surgeries. Patients: Children under the age of 18. Interventions: Studies were included if they were compatible with the criteria that dexmedetomidine was administered intranasally. Measurements: We pooled data on the sedation status as the primary outcome and considered the behavioral score, blood pressure, heart rate and side effects to be secondary outcomes. Risk ratio (RR) and the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Main results: This meta-analysis included 11 RCTs. The SMD for the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine was 2.45 (random, 95% CI; -3.33, -1.58) for continuous outcomes and RR of unsatisfactory patient outcome was 0.42 (M-H, random 95% CI; 026, 0.68 I-2 = 45%) for dichotomous outcomes compared to that of intranasal saline. The SMD for the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine was -0.41 (random, 95% CI; -1.09, 0.27 I-2 = 69%) for continuous outcomes and RR was 0.43 (M-H, random 95% CI; 0.32, 0.58 I-2 = 0%) for dichotomous outcomes compared to that of per os benzodiazepines. Conclusions: This review suggests that intranasal dexmedetomidine is associated with better sedative effects than oral benzodiazepines without producing respiratory depression, but it had a significantly delayed onset of effects. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 39
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Emergence Delirium and Agitation in Children and Adolescents Undergoing Tonsillectomy and/or Adenoidectomy
    Al Mutair, Abbas
    Alabbasi, Yasmine
    Alshammari, Bushra
    Alrasheeday, Awatif M.
    Alharbi, Hanan F.
    Aleid, Abdulsalam M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (05)
  • [42] Intranasal Corticosteroid Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Reported Safety and Adverse Effects in Children
    Donaldson, Angela M.
    Choby, Garret
    Kim, Daniel H.
    Marks, Lisa A.
    Lal, Devyani
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2020, 163 (06) : 1087 - 1096
  • [43] Reflections on: "Is intranasal dexmedetomidine superior to oral chloral hydrate for procedural sedation in children: A systematic review"
    Sethuraman, Raghuraman M.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 16 (02) : 261 - +
  • [44] A comparation of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wen, Jiaxuan
    Ding, Xueying
    Liu, Chen
    Jiang, Wenyu
    Xu, Yingrui
    Wei, Xiuhong
    Liu, Xin
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [45] Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs. Oral Chloral Hydrate for Sedation in Children Undergoing Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Meta-Analysis
    Lyu, Xiaoqian
    Tao, Yujuan
    Dang, Xiujing
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 10
  • [46] Dexmedetomidine as a sedative and analgesic adjuvant in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tsaousi, Georgia G.
    Pourzitaki, Chryssa
    Aloisio, Simone
    Bilotta, Federico
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 74 (11) : 1377 - 1389
  • [47] Dexmedetomidine as a sedative and analgesic adjuvant in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Georgia G. Tsaousi
    Chryssa Pourzitaki
    Simone Aloisio
    Federico Bilotta
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2018, 74 : 1377 - 1389
  • [48] Efficacy and safety of intranasal ketamine compared with intranasal dexmedetomidine as a premedication before general anesthesia in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Dwivedi, Priyanka
    Patel, Tejas K.
    Bajpai, Vijeta
    Singh, Yashpal
    Tripathi, Alka
    Kishore, Suerkha
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2022, 69 (11): : 1405 - 1418
  • [49] Foetal responses to dexmedetomidine in parturients undergoing caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Jian
    Zhou, Haibin
    Sheng, Kaihua
    Tian, Tian
    Wu, Anshi
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 45 (05) : 1613 - 1625
  • [50] Intranasal corticosteroids compared with oral antihistamines in allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Juel-Berg, Nanna
    Darling, Peter
    Bolvig, Julie
    Foss-Skiftesvik, Majken H.
    Halken, Susanne
    Winther, Lone
    Hansen, Kirsten Skamstrup
    Askjaer, Nikolaj
    Heegaard, Steffen
    Madsen, Anders R.
    Opstrup, Morten S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2017, 31 (01) : E19 - E28