The sedative effects of the intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing surgeries compared to other sedation methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:33
|
作者
Kim, Hyun Jung [1 ]
Shin, Woo Jong [2 ]
Park, Suin [2 ]
Ahn, Hyeong Sik [1 ]
Oh, Jae Hoon [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Intranasal; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trials; Sedation; Systematic review; ORAL MIDAZOLAM; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREMEDICATION; ANESTHESIA; KETAMINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.01.014
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: Administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation is comfortable and effective in children who are afraid of needles, and it offers efficient sedation similar to that of intravenous administration. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical effects of the pre-procedural administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine. Design: We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intranasal dexmedetomidine administration to other administration methods of various sedatives or placebo from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, KoreaMed and hand searches of trial registries. Setting: Pediatrics who underwent interventional procedures and surgeries. Patients: Children under the age of 18. Interventions: Studies were included if they were compatible with the criteria that dexmedetomidine was administered intranasally. Measurements: We pooled data on the sedation status as the primary outcome and considered the behavioral score, blood pressure, heart rate and side effects to be secondary outcomes. Risk ratio (RR) and the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Main results: This meta-analysis included 11 RCTs. The SMD for the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine was 2.45 (random, 95% CI; -3.33, -1.58) for continuous outcomes and RR of unsatisfactory patient outcome was 0.42 (M-H, random 95% CI; 026, 0.68 I-2 = 45%) for dichotomous outcomes compared to that of intranasal saline. The SMD for the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine was -0.41 (random, 95% CI; -1.09, 0.27 I-2 = 69%) for continuous outcomes and RR was 0.43 (M-H, random 95% CI; 0.32, 0.58 I-2 = 0%) for dichotomous outcomes compared to that of per os benzodiazepines. Conclusions: This review suggests that intranasal dexmedetomidine is associated with better sedative effects than oral benzodiazepines without producing respiratory depression, but it had a significantly delayed onset of effects. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 39
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is intranasal dexmedetomidine superior to oral chloral hydrate for procedural sedation in children: A systematic review
    Delvi, Mohamed B.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 16 (01) : 82 - 85
  • [32] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Caudal Block as Compared to Noncaudal Regional Techniques for Inguinal Surgeries in Children
    Shanthanna, Harsha
    Singh, Balpreet
    Guyatt, Gordon
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [33] The Effect of Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative Agent for Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Caimu
    Chen, Qijiang
    Wang, Ping
    Jin, Weisheng
    Zhong, Chao
    Ge, Zisheng
    Xu, Kangmin
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [34] The efficacy of buprenorphine compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cansian, Joao Marcos
    Giampaoli, Angelo Zanin D'Angelo
    Immich, Liege Caroline
    Schmidt, Andre Prato
    Dias, Andrei Sanson
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 74 (06):
  • [35] Effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics in patients undergoing hysterectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Li, Zhaoqiu
    Li, Cuiping
    Zhang, Maoxian
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (08)
  • [36] Dexmedetomidine Withdrawal Syndrome in Children in the PICU: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Knapp, Thomas
    DiLeonardo, Olivia
    Maul, Tim
    Hochwald, Alexander
    Li, Zhuo
    Hossain, Jobayer
    Lowry, Adam
    Parker, Jason
    Baker, Kimberly
    Wearden, Peter
    Nelson, Jennifer
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (01) : 62 - 71
  • [37] SEDATION IN DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY - PROPOFOL VERSUS TRADITIONAL SEDATIVE AGENTS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS
    Delgado, Aureo A.
    Bernardo, Wanderlei M.
    Coutinho, Lara M.
    Marinho, Fabio R.
    Lera, Marcos
    Ide, Edson
    de Moura, Eduardo G.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB516 - AB516
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of sedation with dexmedetomidine in adults undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tang, Rou
    Huang, Yaqun
    Zhang, Yujia
    Ma, Xiaolei
    Yu, Haoyang
    Song, Kaichao
    Ren, Ling
    Zhao, Bin
    Wang, Lulu
    Zheng, Wensheng
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [39] Effects of probiotic administration on overweight or obese children: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Li, Ya
    Liu, Tonghua
    Qin, Lingling
    Wu, Lili
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [40] Effects of probiotic administration on overweight or obese children: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Ya Li
    Tonghua Liu
    Lingling Qin
    Lili Wu
    Journal of Translational Medicine, 21