Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation

被引:1
|
作者
Dong, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Jensen, Winnie [2 ]
Geng, Bo [2 ]
Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu [3 ]
Dosen, Strahinja [2 ]
机构
[1] Second Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Orthoped, Changchun, Peoples R China
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Kings Coll London, Dept Informat, Ctr Robot Res, London, England
关键词
closed-loop control; electrical stimulation; subdermal electrodes; prostheses; sensory feedback;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2021.580385
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Aim Limb loss is a dramatic event with a devastating impact on a person's quality of life. Prostheses have been used to restore lost motor abilities and cosmetic appearance. Closing the loop between the prosthesis and the amputee by providing somatosensory feedback to the user might improve the performance, confidence of the amputee, and embodiment of the prosthesis. Recently, a minimally invasive method, in which the electrodes are placed subdermally, was presented and psychometrically evaluated. The present study aimed to assess the quality of online control with subdermal stimulation and compare it to that achieved using surface stimulation (common benchmark) as well as to investigate the impact of training on the two modalities. Methods Ten able-bodied subjects performed a PC-based compensatory tracking task. The subjects employed a joystick to track a predefined pseudorandom trajectory using feedback on the momentary tracking error, which was conveyed via surface and subdermal electrotactile stimulation. The tracking performance was evaluated using the correlation coefficient (CORR), root mean square error (RMSE), and time delay between reference and generated trajectories. Results Both stimulation modalities resulted in good closed-loop control, and surface stimulation outperformed the subdermal approach. There was significant difference in CORR (86 vs 77%) and RMSE (0.23 vs 0.31) between surface and subdermal stimulation (all p < 0.05). The RMSE of the subdermal stimulation decreased significantly in the first few trials. Conclusion Subdermal stimulation is a viable method to provide tactile feedback. The quality of online control is, however, somewhat worse compared to that achieved using surface stimulation. Nevertheless, due to minimal invasiveness, compactness, and power efficiency, the subdermal interface could be an attractive solution for the functional application in sensate prostheses.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improving qubit coherence using closed-loop feedback
    Antti Vepsäläinen
    Roni Winik
    Amir H. Karamlou
    Jochen Braumüller
    Agustin Di Paolo
    Youngkyu Sung
    Bharath Kannan
    Morten Kjaergaard
    David K. Kim
    Alexander J. Melville
    Bethany M. Niedzielski
    Jonilyn L. Yoder
    Simon Gustavsson
    William D. Oliver
    Nature Communications, 13
  • [42] Improving qubit coherence using closed-loop feedback
    Vepsalainen, Antti
    Winik, Roni
    Karamlou, Amir H.
    Braumuller, Jochen
    Di Paolo, Agustin
    Sung, Youngkyu
    Kannan, Bharath
    Kjaergaard, Morten
    Kim, David K.
    Melville, Alexander J.
    Niedzielski, Bethany M.
    Yoder, Jonilyn L.
    Gustavsson, Simon
    Oliver, William D.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [43] In vivo closed-loop control of a locust's leg using nerve stimulation
    Zurita, Francisco
    Del Duca, Fulvia
    Teshima, Tetsuhiko
    Hiendlmeier, Lukas
    Gebhardt, Michael
    Luksch, Harald
    Wolfrum, Bernhard
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [44] In vivo closed-loop control of a locust’s leg using nerve stimulation
    Francisco Zurita
    Fulvia Del Duca
    Tetsuhiko Teshima
    Lukas Hiendlmeier
    Michael Gebhardt
    Harald Luksch
    Bernhard Wolfrum
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [45] Pulsatile desynchronizing delayed feedback for closed-loop deep brain stimulation
    Popovych, Oleksandr V.
    Lysyansky, Borys
    Rosenblum, Michael
    Pikovsky, Arkady
    Tass, Peter A.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [46] Mechanical Blender Control for Closed-Loop Oxygenation Feedback Control Systems
    Tejkl, Leos
    Petrova, Zuzana
    Kudrna, Petr
    Rafl, Jakub
    ADVANCES IN DIGITAL HEALTH AND MEDICAL BIOENGINEERING, VOL 2, EHB-2023, 2024, 110 : 373 - 380
  • [47] Closed-loop Virtual Reference Feedback Control System Design
    Zhou Hong-cheng
    Jiang Zhi-peng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING AND COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2014, : 32 - 35
  • [48] Artificial organic afferent nerves enable closed-loop tactile feedback for intelligent robot
    Chen, Shuai
    Zhou, Zhongliang
    Hou, Kunqi
    Wu, Xihu
    He, Qiang
    Tang, Cindy G.
    Li, Ting
    Zhang, Xiujuan
    Jie, Jiansheng
    Gao, Zhiyi
    Mathews, Nripan
    Leong, Wei Lin
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [49] Closed-loop feedback control of magnetically-activated gels
    Mitwalli, AH
    Denison, TA
    Jackson, DK
    Leeb, SB
    Tanaka, T
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 1997, 8 (07) : 596 - 604
  • [50] Closed-loop automatic feedback control in electron beam melting
    Jorge Mireles
    Cesar Terrazas
    Sara M. Gaytan
    David A. Roberson
    Ryan B. Wicker
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 78 : 1193 - 1199