Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation

被引:1
|
作者
Dong, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Jensen, Winnie [2 ]
Geng, Bo [2 ]
Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu [3 ]
Dosen, Strahinja [2 ]
机构
[1] Second Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Orthoped, Changchun, Peoples R China
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Kings Coll London, Dept Informat, Ctr Robot Res, London, England
关键词
closed-loop control; electrical stimulation; subdermal electrodes; prostheses; sensory feedback;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2021.580385
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Aim Limb loss is a dramatic event with a devastating impact on a person's quality of life. Prostheses have been used to restore lost motor abilities and cosmetic appearance. Closing the loop between the prosthesis and the amputee by providing somatosensory feedback to the user might improve the performance, confidence of the amputee, and embodiment of the prosthesis. Recently, a minimally invasive method, in which the electrodes are placed subdermally, was presented and psychometrically evaluated. The present study aimed to assess the quality of online control with subdermal stimulation and compare it to that achieved using surface stimulation (common benchmark) as well as to investigate the impact of training on the two modalities. Methods Ten able-bodied subjects performed a PC-based compensatory tracking task. The subjects employed a joystick to track a predefined pseudorandom trajectory using feedback on the momentary tracking error, which was conveyed via surface and subdermal electrotactile stimulation. The tracking performance was evaluated using the correlation coefficient (CORR), root mean square error (RMSE), and time delay between reference and generated trajectories. Results Both stimulation modalities resulted in good closed-loop control, and surface stimulation outperformed the subdermal approach. There was significant difference in CORR (86 vs 77%) and RMSE (0.23 vs 0.31) between surface and subdermal stimulation (all p < 0.05). The RMSE of the subdermal stimulation decreased significantly in the first few trials. Conclusion Subdermal stimulation is a viable method to provide tactile feedback. The quality of online control is, however, somewhat worse compared to that achieved using surface stimulation. Nevertheless, due to minimal invasiveness, compactness, and power efficiency, the subdermal interface could be an attractive solution for the functional application in sensate prostheses.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learning to control the brain through adaptive closed-loop patterned stimulation
    Tafazoli, Sina
    MacDowell, Camden J.
    Che, Zongda
    Letai, Katherine C.
    Steinhardt, Cynthia R.
    Buschman, Timothy J.
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 17 (05)
  • [22] Closed-loop feedback control for production optimization
    Dilib, F.A.
    Jackson, M.D.
    Dilib, F.A., 1600, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) (64): : 99 - 101
  • [23] A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback
    D'Anna, Edoardo
    Valle, Giacomo
    Mazzoni, Alberto
    Strauss, Ivo
    Iberite, Francesco
    Patton, Jeremy
    Petrini, Francesco M.
    Raspopovic, Stanisa
    Granata, Giuseppe
    Di Iorio, Riccardo
    Controzzi, Marco
    Cipriani, Christian
    Stieglitz, Thomas
    Rossini, Paolo M.
    Micera, Silvestro
    SCIENCE ROBOTICS, 2019, 4 (27)
  • [24] Closed-loop stimulation in the control of focal epilepsy
    Smith, J
    Murro, M
    Politsky, J
    Park, Y
    Fountas, K
    Jenkins, P
    Greene, D
    Esteller, R
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH MEETING OF THE WORLD SOCIETY OF STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY WSSFN, 2005, : 73 - 78
  • [25] Enabling Closed-Loop Control of the Modular Prosthetic Limb Through Haptic Feedback
    Armiger, Robert S.
    Tenore, Francesco V.
    Katyal, Kapil D.
    Johannes, Matthew S.
    Makhlin, Alexander
    Natter, Mandy L.
    Colgate, J. Edward
    Bensmaia, Sliman J.
    Vogelstein, R. Jacob
    JOHNS HOPKINS APL TECHNICAL DIGEST, 2013, 31 (04): : 345 - 353
  • [26] Closed-loop optimization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography feedback
    Tervo, Aino E.
    Nieminen, Jaakko O.
    Lioumis, Pantelis
    Metsomaa, Johanna
    Souza, Victor H.
    Sinisalo, Heikki
    Stenroos, Matti
    Sarvas, Jukka
    Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2022, 15 (02) : 523 - 531
  • [27] Closed-Loop Photic Stimulation using EEG
    Philipp, Streicher
    NEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2018, 77 (03) : 155 - 155
  • [28] Neuromimetic Event-Based Detection for Closed-Loop Tactile Feedback Control of Upper Limb Prostheses
    Osborn, Luke
    Kaliki, Rahul R.
    Soares, Alcimar B.
    Thakor, Nitish V.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS, 2016, 9 (02) : 196 - 206
  • [29] Proportional closed-loop feedback control of flow separation
    Pinier, Jeremy T.
    Ausseur, Julie M.
    Glauser, Mark N.
    Higuchi, Hiroshi
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2007, 45 (01) : 181 - 190
  • [30] Waterflooding using closed-loop control
    Geir Nævdal
    D. Roald Brouwer
    Jan-Dirk Jansen
    Computational Geosciences, 2006, 10 : 37 - 60