Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation

被引:1
|
作者
Dong, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Jensen, Winnie [2 ]
Geng, Bo [2 ]
Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu [3 ]
Dosen, Strahinja [2 ]
机构
[1] Second Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Orthoped, Changchun, Peoples R China
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Kings Coll London, Dept Informat, Ctr Robot Res, London, England
关键词
closed-loop control; electrical stimulation; subdermal electrodes; prostheses; sensory feedback;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2021.580385
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Aim Limb loss is a dramatic event with a devastating impact on a person's quality of life. Prostheses have been used to restore lost motor abilities and cosmetic appearance. Closing the loop between the prosthesis and the amputee by providing somatosensory feedback to the user might improve the performance, confidence of the amputee, and embodiment of the prosthesis. Recently, a minimally invasive method, in which the electrodes are placed subdermally, was presented and psychometrically evaluated. The present study aimed to assess the quality of online control with subdermal stimulation and compare it to that achieved using surface stimulation (common benchmark) as well as to investigate the impact of training on the two modalities. Methods Ten able-bodied subjects performed a PC-based compensatory tracking task. The subjects employed a joystick to track a predefined pseudorandom trajectory using feedback on the momentary tracking error, which was conveyed via surface and subdermal electrotactile stimulation. The tracking performance was evaluated using the correlation coefficient (CORR), root mean square error (RMSE), and time delay between reference and generated trajectories. Results Both stimulation modalities resulted in good closed-loop control, and surface stimulation outperformed the subdermal approach. There was significant difference in CORR (86 vs 77%) and RMSE (0.23 vs 0.31) between surface and subdermal stimulation (all p < 0.05). The RMSE of the subdermal stimulation decreased significantly in the first few trials. Conclusion Subdermal stimulation is a viable method to provide tactile feedback. The quality of online control is, however, somewhat worse compared to that achieved using surface stimulation. Nevertheless, due to minimal invasiveness, compactness, and power efficiency, the subdermal interface could be an attractive solution for the functional application in sensate prostheses.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Different Tactile Feedback on Myoelectric Closed-Loop Control for Grasping Based on Electrotactile Stimulation
    Xu, Heng
    Zhang, Dingguo
    Huegel, Joel C.
    Xu, Wendong
    Zhu, Xiangyang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2016, 24 (08) : 827 - 836
  • [2] The impact of the stimulation frequency on closed-loop control with electrotactile feedback
    Paredes, Liliana P.
    Dosen, Strahinja
    Rattay, Frank
    Graimann, Bernhard
    Farina, Dario
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 12
  • [3] The impact of the stimulation frequency on closed-loop control with electrotactile feedback
    Liliana P Paredes
    Strahinja Dosen
    Frank Rattay
    Bernhard Graimann
    Dario Farina
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 12
  • [4] Virtual Grasping: Closed-Loop Force Control Using Electrotactile Feedback
    Jorgovanovic, Nikola
    Dosen, Strahinja
    Djozic, Damir J.
    Krajoski, Goran
    Farina, Dario
    COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 2014
  • [5] Providing Slip Feedback for Closed-Loop Control of Myoelectric Prosthesis via Electrotactile Stimulation
    Bao, Linjun
    Zhang, Dingguo
    Xu, Heng
    Zhu, Xiangyang
    INTELLIGENT ROBOTICS AND APPLICATIONS, ICIRA 2015, PT I, 2015, 9244 : 319 - 328
  • [6] Closed-Loop Control of Myoelectric Prostheses With Electrotactile Feedback: Influence of Stimulation Artifact and Blanking
    Hartmann, Cornelia
    Dosen, Strahinja
    Amsuess, Sebastian
    Farina, Dario
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2015, 23 (05) : 807 - 816
  • [7] Closed-loop Control using Electrotactile Feedback Encoded in Frequency and Pulse Width
    Dideriksen, Jakob L.
    Mercader, Irene Uriarte
    Dosen, Strahinja
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS, 2020, 13 (04) : 818 - 824
  • [8] Time-division multiplexing for myoelectric closed-loop control using electrotactile feedback
    Strahinja Dosen
    Marie-Caroline Schaeffer
    Dario Farina
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 11
  • [9] Time-division multiplexing for myoelectric closed-loop control using electrotactile feedback
    Dosen, Strahinja
    Schaeffer, Marie-Caroline
    Farina, Dario
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 11
  • [10] Closed-Loop System for Myoelectric Hand Control Based on Electrotactile Stimulation
    Cheng, Shaona
    Yi, Andong
    Tan, U-Xuan
    Zhang, Dingguo
    2018 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED ROBOTICS AND MECHATRONICS (IEEE ICARM), 2018, : 486 - 490