Comparison of first-generation (1908 nm) and second-generation (1940 nm) thulium fiber lasers for ablation of kidney stones

被引:2
|
作者
Hardy, Luke A. [1 ]
Fried, Nathaniel M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Phys & Opt Sci, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Carolinas Med Ctr, McKay Dept Urol, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
ablation; kidney stones; laser; thulium; TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENCE; LITHOTRIPSY; TISSUE; HOLMIUM; WATER; ABSORPTION;
D O I
10.1117/1.OE.58.9.096101
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Thulium fiber lasers (TFL) are being developed as alternatives to conventional holmium:YAG lasers for lithotripsy. TFLs emit at two primary infrared (IR) wavelengths, 1908 or 1940 nm, closely matching high (70 degrees C) and low (22 degrees C) temperature water absorption peaks in tissue, respectively. Water, which is present in the pores of kidney stones and fluid environment of the urinary tract as well as delivered through the working channel of the ureteroscope during lithotripsy, is a primary absorber of IR laser radiation. The water absorption peak shifts from 1940 to 1920 nm with increasing water temperature during laser ablation. At high water temperatures (70 degrees C), the absorption coefficient is 150 cm(-1) at 1908 nm and 135 cm(-1) at 1940 nm. The goal of this study was to determine whether this 10% difference translates into a measurable difference in kidney stone ablation rates. Two TFLs (1908 and 1940 nm) were tested at similar laser parameters of 35 mJ energy/pulse, 500-mu s pulse duration, 300-Hz pulse rate, and 10.5-W average power, using 200-mu m-core silica optical fibers. The handheld fiber was maintained in contact with 6- to 9-mm diameter uric acid (UA) stones, immersed in a saline bath with saline flow (n = 10 stones / group). Laser irradiation time to fragment and pass all stone fragments through a 1-mm sieve was measured and then divided into initial stone mass to calculate stone ablation rates. For each laser group (1908 and 1940 nm), initial stone mass was 270 +/- 60 mg versus 260 +/- 50 mg, respectively (p = 0.9). Stone ablation rates measured 0.9 +/- 0.2 and 0.9 +/- 0.1 mg s(-1) (p = 0.9). Stone ablation thresholds measured 8 +/- 7 and 5 +/- 13 J cm(-2) (p = 0.8). There was no significant difference in UA stone ablation thresholds and ablation rates between 1908- and 1940-nm wavelengths. Newer, more compact, efficient, and higher peak power TFLs operating at 1940 nm provide comparable stone ablation rates to older 1908-nm TFLs for similar laser parameters. (C) 2019 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Frequency of Neoatherosclerosis With ISR Dramatically Decreased in the Second-Generation and the Third-Generation DES Compared With First-Generation DES
    Kawamura, Akito
    Ukita, Kouhei
    Yanagawa, Kyousuke
    Yasunaga, Motoki
    Matsuhiro, Yutaka
    Nakamura, Hitoshi
    Yasumoto, Kouzi
    Yasumura, Keisuke
    Tanaka, Akihiro
    Matsunaga, Yasuharu
    Nakamura, Daisuke
    Yano, Masamichi
    Yamato, Masaki
    Egami, Yasuyuki
    Syutta, Ryu
    Nishino, Masami
    Tanouchi, Zyun
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [42] Suicide among first-generation and second-generation immigrants in Sweden: association with labour market marginalisation and morbidity
    Di Thiene, Domitilla
    Alexanderson, K.
    Tinghog, P.
    La Torre, G.
    Mittendorfer-Rutz, E.
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2015, 69 (05) : 467 - 473
  • [43] Sexual function of patients with schizophrenia receiving first-generation (FGA) or second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) treatment
    Mahmoud, Ahmed
    Hayhurst, Karen P.
    Drake, Richard J.
    Lewis, Shon W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 16 (02) : 148 - 152
  • [44] 1880-nm Broadband ASE Generation With Bismuth-Thulium Codoped Fiber
    Halder, A.
    Paul, M. C.
    Harun, S. W.
    Ali, S. M. M.
    Saidin, N.
    Damanhuri, S. S. A.
    Ahmad, H.
    Das, S.
    Pal, M.
    Bhadra, S. K.
    IEEE PHOTONICS JOURNAL, 2012, 4 (06): : 2176 - 2181
  • [45] First-generation versus second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotic drugs and time to relapse
    Stone, James M.
    Roux, Simon
    Taylor, David
    Morrison, Paul D.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 8 (12) : 333 - 336
  • [46] A prospective, randomized comparison of a 1940 nm and a 2013 nm thulium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser device for Thulium VapoEnucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP): First results
    Tiburtius, Christian
    Gross, Andreas J.
    Netsch, Christopher
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 31 (01) : 47 - 51
  • [47] Comparison between first-generation (fixed-caliber) and second-generation (self-expanding, large caliber) temporary prostatic stents
    Yachia, D
    Aridogan, IA
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1996, 57 (03) : 165 - 169
  • [48] Endometrial ablation: first- vs. second-generation techniques
    Angioni, Stefano
    Pontis, Alessandro
    Nappi, Luigi
    Sedda, Federica
    Sorrentino, Felice
    Litta, Pietro
    Haimovich, Sergio
    Melis, Gian B.
    MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2016, 68 (02): : 143 - 153
  • [49] Fragmentation and Dusting of Large Kidney Stones using Compact, Air-cooled, High Peak Power, 1940-nm, Thulium Fiber Laser
    Hardy, Luke A.
    Gonzalez, David A.
    Irby, Pierce B.
    Fried, Nathaniel M.
    THERAPEUTICS AND DIAGNOSTICS IN UROLOGY 2018, 2018, 10468
  • [50] First-generation versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gao, Wei-dong
    Ma, Min
    Zhang, Gao-xing
    Zhang, Xue-fang
    Sun, Gang
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2019, 131 (01) : 43 - 51