Comparison of first-generation (1908 nm) and second-generation (1940 nm) thulium fiber lasers for ablation of kidney stones

被引:2
|
作者
Hardy, Luke A. [1 ]
Fried, Nathaniel M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Phys & Opt Sci, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Carolinas Med Ctr, McKay Dept Urol, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
ablation; kidney stones; laser; thulium; TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENCE; LITHOTRIPSY; TISSUE; HOLMIUM; WATER; ABSORPTION;
D O I
10.1117/1.OE.58.9.096101
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Thulium fiber lasers (TFL) are being developed as alternatives to conventional holmium:YAG lasers for lithotripsy. TFLs emit at two primary infrared (IR) wavelengths, 1908 or 1940 nm, closely matching high (70 degrees C) and low (22 degrees C) temperature water absorption peaks in tissue, respectively. Water, which is present in the pores of kidney stones and fluid environment of the urinary tract as well as delivered through the working channel of the ureteroscope during lithotripsy, is a primary absorber of IR laser radiation. The water absorption peak shifts from 1940 to 1920 nm with increasing water temperature during laser ablation. At high water temperatures (70 degrees C), the absorption coefficient is 150 cm(-1) at 1908 nm and 135 cm(-1) at 1940 nm. The goal of this study was to determine whether this 10% difference translates into a measurable difference in kidney stone ablation rates. Two TFLs (1908 and 1940 nm) were tested at similar laser parameters of 35 mJ energy/pulse, 500-mu s pulse duration, 300-Hz pulse rate, and 10.5-W average power, using 200-mu m-core silica optical fibers. The handheld fiber was maintained in contact with 6- to 9-mm diameter uric acid (UA) stones, immersed in a saline bath with saline flow (n = 10 stones / group). Laser irradiation time to fragment and pass all stone fragments through a 1-mm sieve was measured and then divided into initial stone mass to calculate stone ablation rates. For each laser group (1908 and 1940 nm), initial stone mass was 270 +/- 60 mg versus 260 +/- 50 mg, respectively (p = 0.9). Stone ablation rates measured 0.9 +/- 0.2 and 0.9 +/- 0.1 mg s(-1) (p = 0.9). Stone ablation thresholds measured 8 +/- 7 and 5 +/- 13 J cm(-2) (p = 0.8). There was no significant difference in UA stone ablation thresholds and ablation rates between 1908- and 1940-nm wavelengths. Newer, more compact, efficient, and higher peak power TFLs operating at 1940 nm provide comparable stone ablation rates to older 1908-nm TFLs for similar laser parameters. (C) 2019 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison between First- and Second-Generation Cryoballoon for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
    Conti, Sergio
    Moltrasio, Massimo
    Fassini, Gaetano
    Tundo, Fabrizio
    Riva, Stefania
    Dello Russo, Antonio
    Casella, Michela
    Majocchi, Benedetta
    Marino, Vittoria
    De Iuliis, Pasquale
    Catto, Valentina
    Pala, Salvatore
    Tondo, Claudio
    CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 2016
  • [32] Effliciency of including first-generation information in second-generation ranking and selection: results of computer simulation
    Ye, Terrance Z.
    Jayawickrama, Keith J. S.
    Johnson, G. R.
    TREE GENETICS & GENOMES, 2007, 3 (04) : 319 - 328
  • [33] Characteristics of Late-Acquired Incomplete Stent Apposition: A Comparison With First-Generation and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents
    Waseda, Katsuhisa
    Ako, Junya
    Kume, Teruyoshi
    Fitzgerald, Peter J.
    Honda, Yasuhiro
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 28 (08): : 323 - 329
  • [34] Comparison of clinical outcomes between first-generation and second-generation drug-eluting stents in type 2 diabetic patients
    Jeong, Han Saem
    Cho, Jae Young
    Kim, Eun Ji
    Yu, Cheol Woong
    Ahn, Chul-Min
    Park, Jae Hyoung
    Hong, Soon Jun
    Lim, Do-Sun
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2013, 24 (08) : 676 - 683
  • [35] A Real World Comparison of a Second-Generation Manual Expanding Versus a First-Generation Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve
    Gooley, Robert
    Talman, Andrew
    Cameron, James
    Antonis, Paul
    Lockwood, Siobhan
    Meredith, Ian T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (11) : B210 - B210
  • [36] Comparison of a novel high-power blue diode laser (λ=442 nm) with Ho: YAG (λ=2100 nm), Tm fiber (λ=1940 nm), and KTP (λ=532 nm) lasers for soft tissue ablation
    Vinnichenko, Victoriya
    Kovalenko, Anastasiya
    Arkhipova, Valeriya
    Yaroslavsky, Ilya
    Altshuler, Gregory
    Gapontsev, Valentin
    THERAPEUTICS AND DIAGNOSTICS IN UROLOGY 2018, 2018, 10468
  • [37] Light at the End of the Tunnel: Comparative Effectiveness of Second-Generation Digital SpyGlass With First-Generation SpyGlass® Cholangioscopy
    Mizrahi, Meir
    Wang, Yan
    Jonah, Cohen
    Chuttani, Ram
    Sawhney, Mandeep
    Berzin, Tyler M.
    Pleskow, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S25 - S25
  • [38] DEVELOPMENT OF FIRST-GENERATION AND SECOND-GENERATION SCHIZONTS OF EIMERIA-MAGNA FROM RABBITS IN CELL CULTURES
    SPEER, CA
    HAMMOND, DM
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PARASITENKUNDE, 1971, 37 (04): : 336 - &
  • [39] First-generation versus second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics in schizophrenia: cognitive impairment
    Romero Guillena, S. L.
    Plasencia Garcia de Diego, B. O.
    Sanchez-luengo, F. Gotor
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 56 : S512 - S513
  • [40] Are second-generation migrants at a higher risk of developing psychotic disorders than the first-generation? A systematic review
    Bourque, F.
    Malla, A. K.
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 2 : A44 - A44