Comparison of first-generation (1908 nm) and second-generation (1940 nm) thulium fiber lasers for ablation of kidney stones

被引:2
|
作者
Hardy, Luke A. [1 ]
Fried, Nathaniel M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Phys & Opt Sci, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Carolinas Med Ctr, McKay Dept Urol, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
ablation; kidney stones; laser; thulium; TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENCE; LITHOTRIPSY; TISSUE; HOLMIUM; WATER; ABSORPTION;
D O I
10.1117/1.OE.58.9.096101
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Thulium fiber lasers (TFL) are being developed as alternatives to conventional holmium:YAG lasers for lithotripsy. TFLs emit at two primary infrared (IR) wavelengths, 1908 or 1940 nm, closely matching high (70 degrees C) and low (22 degrees C) temperature water absorption peaks in tissue, respectively. Water, which is present in the pores of kidney stones and fluid environment of the urinary tract as well as delivered through the working channel of the ureteroscope during lithotripsy, is a primary absorber of IR laser radiation. The water absorption peak shifts from 1940 to 1920 nm with increasing water temperature during laser ablation. At high water temperatures (70 degrees C), the absorption coefficient is 150 cm(-1) at 1908 nm and 135 cm(-1) at 1940 nm. The goal of this study was to determine whether this 10% difference translates into a measurable difference in kidney stone ablation rates. Two TFLs (1908 and 1940 nm) were tested at similar laser parameters of 35 mJ energy/pulse, 500-mu s pulse duration, 300-Hz pulse rate, and 10.5-W average power, using 200-mu m-core silica optical fibers. The handheld fiber was maintained in contact with 6- to 9-mm diameter uric acid (UA) stones, immersed in a saline bath with saline flow (n = 10 stones / group). Laser irradiation time to fragment and pass all stone fragments through a 1-mm sieve was measured and then divided into initial stone mass to calculate stone ablation rates. For each laser group (1908 and 1940 nm), initial stone mass was 270 +/- 60 mg versus 260 +/- 50 mg, respectively (p = 0.9). Stone ablation rates measured 0.9 +/- 0.2 and 0.9 +/- 0.1 mg s(-1) (p = 0.9). Stone ablation thresholds measured 8 +/- 7 and 5 +/- 13 J cm(-2) (p = 0.8). There was no significant difference in UA stone ablation thresholds and ablation rates between 1908- and 1940-nm wavelengths. Newer, more compact, efficient, and higher peak power TFLs operating at 1940 nm provide comparable stone ablation rates to older 1908-nm TFLs for similar laser parameters. (C) 2019 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of 1908 and 1940 nm Wavelengths for Thulium Fiber Laser Lithotripsy
    Hardy, Luke A.
    Fried, Nathaniel M.
    THERAPEUTICS AND DIAGNOSTICS IN UROLOGY 2019, 2019, 10852
  • [2] Holmium:YAG (λ=2120 nm) vs. Thulium Fiber Laser (λ=1908 nm) Ablation of Kidney Stones: Thresholds, Rates, and Retropulsion
    Blackmon, Richard L.
    Irby, Pierce B.
    Fried, Nathaniel M.
    PHOTONIC THERAPEUTICS AND DIAGNOSTICS VII, 2011, 7883
  • [3] First-generation vs second-generation antihistamines
    Aelony, Y
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (17) : 1949 - 1949
  • [4] Educational Assimilation of First-Generation and Second-Generation Immigrants in Germany
    Thomas Gries
    Margarete Redlin
    Moonum Zehra
    Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2022, 23 : 815 - 845
  • [5] Educational Assimilation of First-Generation and Second-Generation Immigrants in Germany
    Gries, Thomas
    Redlin, Margarete
    Zehra, Moonum
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION, 2022, 23 (02) : 815 - 845
  • [6] Comparison of one first-generation and three second-generation methods for the determination of CA 125
    Martin, MJ
    Blockx, PP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS, 1996, 11 (01): : 36 - 39
  • [7] Comparison of effectiveness of antipsychotics in schizophrenia in South Asian population: Second-generation versus the first-generation
    Zubair, U.
    Ali, A.
    Taj, R.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 48 : S539 - S539
  • [8] First-generation versus second-generation antipsychotic drugs for depression in schizophrenia
    Corbo, M.
    Acciavatti, T.
    Marini, S.
    Cinosi, E.
    Di Tizio, L.
    Di Caprio, L.
    Viceconte, D.
    Matteo, L.
    Giuseppe, D. I.
    Martinotti, G.
    Di Giannantonio, M.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 33 : S245 - S245
  • [9] An exploratory propensity score matched comparison of second-generation and first-generation baroreflex activation therapy systems
    Wachter, Rolf
    Halbach, Marcel
    Bakris, George L.
    Bisognano, John D.
    Haller, Hermann
    Beige, Joachim
    Kroon, Abraham A.
    Nadim, Mitra K.
    Lovett, Eric G.
    Schafer, Jill E.
    de Leeuw, Peter W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 11 (02) : 81 - 91
  • [10] Comparison of second-generation with first-generation drug eluting stent for coronary chronic total occlusion intervention
    Cho, Min Soo
    Lee, Cheol Hyun
    Kim, Yu Na
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Lee, Pil Hyung
    Roh, Jae-Hyung
    Chang, Mineok
    Yoon, Sung-Han
    Ahn, Jung-Min
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Kang, Soo-Jin
    Lee, Seung-Whan
    Kim, Young-Hak
    Lee, Cheol Whan
    Park, Seong-Wook
    Park, Seung-Jung
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (15) : B238 - B238