Safety of smartwatches and their chargers in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

被引:6
|
作者
Tzeis, Stylianos [1 ]
Asvestas, Dimitrios [1 ]
Moraitis, Nektarios [2 ]
Vardas, Emmanuel P. [1 ]
Mililis, Panagiotis [3 ]
Letsas, Konstantinos [3 ]
Kouvelas, Konstantinos [1 ]
Nikita, Konstantina S. [2 ]
Vardas, Panos [1 ]
机构
[1] Mitera Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Hygeia Grp, Erithrou Stavrou 6, Athens, Greece
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Athens, Greece
[3] Evangelismos Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Electrophysiol Lab, Athens, Greece
来源
EUROPACE | 2021年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
Electromagnetic interference; Smartwatch; Cardiac implantable electronic device;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euaa220
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI). Smartwatches and their chargers could be a possible source of EMI. We sought to assess whether the latest generation smartwatches and their chargers interfere with proper CIED function. Methods and results We included consecutive CIED recipients in two centres. We tested two latest generation smartwatches (Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch) and their charging cables for potential EMI. The testing was performed under continuous electrocardiogram recording and real-time device telemetry, with nominal and 'worst-case' settings. In vitro magnetic field measurements were performed to assess the emissions from the tested devices, initially in contact with the probe and then at a distance of 10 cm and 20 cm. In total, 171 patients with CIEDs (71.3% pacemakers-28.7% implantable cardioverter-defibrillators) from five manufacturers were enrolled (63.2% males, 74.8 +/- 11.4 years), resulting in 684 EMI tests. No EMI was identified in any patient either under nominal or 'worst-case scenario' programming. The peak magnetic flux density emitted by the smartwatches was similar to the background noise level (0.81 mu T) even when in contact with the measuring probe. The respective values for the chargers were 4.696 mu T and 4.299 mu T for the Samsung and Apple chargers, respectively, which fell at the background noise level when placed at 20 cm and 10 cm, respectively. Conclusion Two latest generation smartwatches and their chargers resulted in no EMI in CIED recipients. The absence of EMI in conjunction with the extremely low intensity of magnetic fields emitted by these devices support the safety of their use by CIED patients.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 103
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety of electronic massagers in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Chia, Pow-Li
    Mok, Kwang-How
    Wong, Shiun Woei
    Foo, David
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (01): : 167 - 170
  • [2] The Use of Electrocardiogram Smartwatches in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices
    Strik, Marc
    Ploux, Sylvain
    van der Zande, Joske
    Velraeds, Anouk
    Fontagne, Leslie
    Haissaguerre, Michel
    Bordachar, Pierre
    [J]. SENSORS, 2024, 24 (02)
  • [3] THE SAFETY OF MRI IN PATIENTS WITH HYBRID CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES
    Liu, Michael
    Pannunzio, Sofia
    Minaskeian, Nareg
    Klooster, Lindsay
    Sorajja, Dan
    Scott, Luis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 245 - 245
  • [4] Update on MRI Safety in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Markman, Timothy M.
    Halperin, Henry R.
    Nazarian, Saman
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (03) : 656 - 657
  • [5] Magnetic resonance imaging safety in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Yang, Eunice
    Suzuki, Masahito
    Nazarian, Saman
    Halperin, Henry R.
    [J]. TRENDS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 32 (07) : 440 - 447
  • [6] Safety and outcomes of noncardiac surgery in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Akhondi, Bahman
    Ansari-Ramandi, Mohammadmostafa
    Heidarali, Mona
    Kamali, Farzad
    Haghjoo, Majid
    [J]. RESEARCH IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (03) : 76 - 78
  • [7] Safety of repetitive nerve stimulation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Cronin, Edmond M.
    Gray, Jennifer
    Abi-Saleh, Bernard
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    Levin, Kerry H.
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 2013, 47 (06) : 840 - 844
  • [8] The Safety of Cardiac and Thoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Dandamudi, Sanjay
    Collins, Jeremy D.
    Carr, James C.
    Mongkolwat, Pat
    Rahsepar, Amir A.
    Tomson, Todd T.
    Verma, Nishant
    Arora, Rishi
    Chicos, Alex B.
    Kim, Susan S.
    Lin, Albert C.
    Passman, Rod S.
    Knight, Bradley P.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (12) : 1498 - 1505
  • [9] Are Contemporary Smartwatches and Mobile Phones Safe for Patients With Cardiovascular implantable Electronic Devices?
    Lacour, Philipp
    Parwani, Abdul Shokor
    Schuessler, Franziska
    Hohendanner, Felix
    Heinzel, Frank R.
    Trippel, Tobias D.
    Boldt, Leif-Hendrik
    Pieske, Burkert
    Blaschke, Florian
    [J]. JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (09) : 1158 - 1166
  • [10] Cardiac MRI for Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Stojanovska, Jadranka
    Runge, Mason
    Mahani, Maryam Ghadimi
    Cronin, Paul P.
    Sayyouh, Mohamed
    Bogun, Frank
    Ibrahim, El-Sayed H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (02) : 374 - 381