The Malleable Implant Salvage Technique: Infection Outcomes after Mulcahy Salvage Procedure and Replacement of Infected Inflatable Penile Prosthesis with Malleable Prosthesis

被引:54
|
作者
Gross, Martin S. [1 ]
Phillips, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Balen, Alejandra [1 ]
Eid, J. Francois [2 ]
Yang, Christopher [3 ]
Simon, Ross [3 ]
Martinez, Daniel [3 ]
Carrion, Rafael [3 ]
Perito, Paul [4 ]
Levine, Laurence [5 ]
Greenfield, Jason [6 ]
Munarriz, Ricardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Adv Urol Care, New York, NY USA
[3] USF Morsani Coll Med, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Perito Urol, Coral Gables, FL USA
[5] Rush Med Coll, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[6] Urol Associates North Texas, Arlington, TX USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2016年 / 195卷 / 03期
关键词
penile prosthesis; salvage therapy; infection; erectile dysfunction; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.091
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Since its introduction in 1996 Mulcahy salvage has significantly improved outcomes for the removal and replacement of infected inflatable penile prostheses. Long-term followup data of Mulcahy salvage show an infection-free rate of 82%. A multicenter retrospective analysis of the malleable implant salvage technique was conducted to assess infection outcomes and the feasibility of conversion from malleable device back to inflatable penile prosthesis. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective, institutional review board exempt, multi-institution study of 58 patients who underwent Mulcahy salvage with inflatable penile prosthesis removal and replacement with malleable prosthesis. Patient operative notes and charts were extensively reviewed to compile study data. Results: Between 2002 and 2014 a total of 58 patients underwent infected inflatable penile prosthesis removal and replacement with a malleable prosthesis via Mulcahy salvage. Of these patients 54 (93%) have remained infection-free postoperatively. Average patient age was 56.4 years and average operative time was 148 minutes. Postoperative followup (as of May 2015) ranged from 1 month to 84 months. Of the 54 patients 37 retained the malleable prosthesis and 17 (31%) subsequently underwent replacement with an inflatable penile prosthesis. This occurred on average 6.7 months after Mulcahy salvage. Four patients had persistent infection after Mulcahy salvage with the malleable prosthesis and underwent explantation. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis of Mulcahy salvage procedure and replacement of inflatable penile prosthesis with malleable prosthesis shows a high infection-free rate. Additionally, 17 of the 54 patients who remained infection-free were able to successfully undergo subsequent removal of the malleable prosthesis and replacement with an inflatable penile prosthesis. Further prospective studies are needed to compare salvage with malleable vs inflatable penile prosthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 697
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE SUBCORONAL APPROACH: A SOUND TECHNIQUE FOR SALVAGE PENILE PROSTHESIS SURGERY
    Beilan, J.
    Baumgarten, A.
    Bickell, M.
    Hakky, T.
    Carrion, R.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (02): : E89 - E89
  • [42] Inflatable penile prosthesis outcomes after pelvic radiation
    Dave, Chirag N.
    Kohn, Taylor P.
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Arafa, Ali
    Burnett, Arthur L.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : 10382 - 10387
  • [43] REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT OF INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS WITH SALVAGE WASHOUT, ECTOPIC RESERVOIR PLACEMENT & SCROTOPLASTY UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA
    Park, S. S. H.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (01): : S89 - S89
  • [44] MALLEABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA: SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND EARLY EXPERIENCE
    Lindenbaum, M. Mass
    Harlamova, D.
    Werneburg, G.
    Bajic, P.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024, 21
  • [45] Malleable Implant Substitution for the Management of Penile Prosthesis Pump Erosion: A Pilot Study Editorial Comment
    Morey, Allen F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (02): : 596 - 597
  • [46] PENILE LENGTH AFTER INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANT: DOES IT REALLY MATTER?
    Ricapito, Anna
    Rubino, Matteo
    Falagario, Ugo G.
    Mancini, Vito
    Busetto, GianMaria
    Cormio, Luigi
    Carrieri, Giuseppe
    Bettocchi, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E975 - E975
  • [47] A salvage procedure for redo penile prosthesis implantation in phalloplasty (De castro technique) for congenital aphallia
    Macedo Jr, Antonio
    Ottoni, Sergio Leite
    de Castro, Roberto
    Garrone, Gilmar
    da Cruz, Marcela Leal
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2021, 17 (03) : 422 - 423
  • [48] Can This Prosthesis Be Saved?: Implant Salvage Attempts in Infected Primary TKA
    Gardner, Jeremy
    Gioe, Terence J.
    Tatman, Penny
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (04) : 970 - 976
  • [49] Local Treatment of Penile Prosthesis Infection as Alternative to Immediate Salvage Surgery
    Lujan, Saturnino
    Rogel, Ramon
    Broseta, Enrique
    Boronat, Francisco
    Sexual Medicine, 2016, 4 (04): : E255 - E258
  • [50] Comparison of Penile Prosthesis Cultures Within Individual Patients After Removal/Replacement and Subsequent Salvage
    Chandrapal, Jason
    Harper, Shelby
    Davis, Leah G.
    Lentz, Aaron C.
    SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (04): : 783 - 787