A Systematic Review of Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

被引:62
|
作者
Paravastu, S. C. V. [1 ]
Ghosh, J. [1 ]
Murray, D. [1 ]
Farquharson, F. G. [1 ]
Serracino-Inglott, F. [1 ]
Walker, M. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Infirm, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
关键词
Inflammatory aneurysm; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Surgery; Endoluminal therapy; EVAR; FOLLOW-UP; RETROPERITONEAL FIBROSIS; PERIANEURYSMAL FIBROSIS; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; REGRESSION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; GRAFT; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) have traditionally been treated by open surgical repair (OSR). Over the last decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been increasingly employed. The optimal treatment option for IAAA remains unclear. This article aims to evaluate and compare outcomes of OSR and EVAR in IAAA repair. Methods: All publications in the English language relating to IAAA were sought electronically using OVID and MEDLINE (1972-2008). Studies identifying 30-day mortality were considered. Periaortic inflammation (PAI), hydronephrosis and 1-year mortality were obtained from studies with at least 1-year computed tomography (CT) follow-up. Outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared and analysed for statistical significance using Fisher's exact test. Results: The results were obtained from 35 studies comprising 999 patients and 21 studies with 121 patients who underwent OSR and EVAR, respectively. One-year CT follow-up was available for 124 and 52 patients from the two groups, respectively. Thirty-day mortality after OSR was 6% (95% confidence interval (CI); 6-13) and 2% (95% CI; 0-7) after EVAR (p = 0.1). At 1 year, PAI regressed in 73% (95% CI; 64-80) in the OSR group compared to 65% (95% CI; 49-77) of the EVAR group (p = 0.7). Conversely, inflammation progressed in 1% and 4%, respectively (p = 0.1). Forty-five patients undergoing OSR and 29 EVAR were found to have preoperative hydronephrosis. This regressed postoperatively in 69% (95% CI; 53.3-81.8) and 38% (95% CI; 20.6-57.7), respectively (p = 0.01). Hydronephrosis progressed in 9% of patients after OSR and in 21% after EVAR (p = 0.1). New-onset hydronephrosis developed in 6% undergoing OSR compared to 2% with EVAR (p = 0.2). One-year all-cause mortality after OSR was 14% (95% CI; 6-18) compared to 2% (95% CI; 0-13) after EVAR (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Either OSR or EVAR may be considered based on patient suitability. EVAR is associated with lower 1-year mortality compared to OSR. However, OSR may be preferred in those patients who have hydronephrosis and are deemed low risk. (C) 2009 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 297
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quality of Life After Open Surgical versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Akbulut, Mustafa
    Aksoy, Eray
    Kara, Ibrahim
    Cekmecelioglu, Davut
    Koksal, Cengiz
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 33 (03) : 265 - 270
  • [42] Complications of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A review
    Katzen, Barry T.
    MacLean, Alexandra A.
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (06) : 935 - 946
  • [43] Pictorial review: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Dyet, JF
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (827): : 1069 - 1074
  • [44] Hospital cost of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A multicenter study
    Sternbergh, WC
    Money, SR
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 31 (02) : 237 - 244
  • [45] A comparison of open surgery versus endovascular repair of unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Gupta, Prateek K.
    Ramanan, Bala
    Engelbert, Travis L.
    Tefera, Girma
    Hoch, John R.
    Kent, K. Craig
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 60 (06) : 1439 - 1445
  • [46] Early Mortality Following Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Chagpar, Ryaz B.
    Harris, Jeremy R.
    Lawlor, D. Kirk
    DeRose, Guy
    Forbes, Thomas L.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 44 (08) : 645 - 649
  • [47] Complications of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Review
    Barry T. Katzen
    Alexandra A. MacLean
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2006, 29 : 935 - 946
  • [48] Elective endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians
    Paolini, David
    Chahwan, Santiago
    Wojnarowski, Dennis
    Pigott, John P.
    LaPorte, Frankie
    Comerota, Anthony J.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 47 (05) : 924 - 927
  • [49] Late conversion of endovascular to open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Forbes, Thomas L.
    Harrington, David M.
    Harris, Jeremy R.
    DeRose, Guy
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 55 (04) : 254 - 258
  • [50] Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Eisner, Mark D.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (24): : 2644 - 2645