A Systematic Review of Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

被引:62
|
作者
Paravastu, S. C. V. [1 ]
Ghosh, J. [1 ]
Murray, D. [1 ]
Farquharson, F. G. [1 ]
Serracino-Inglott, F. [1 ]
Walker, M. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Infirm, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
关键词
Inflammatory aneurysm; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Surgery; Endoluminal therapy; EVAR; FOLLOW-UP; RETROPERITONEAL FIBROSIS; PERIANEURYSMAL FIBROSIS; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; REGRESSION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; GRAFT; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) have traditionally been treated by open surgical repair (OSR). Over the last decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been increasingly employed. The optimal treatment option for IAAA remains unclear. This article aims to evaluate and compare outcomes of OSR and EVAR in IAAA repair. Methods: All publications in the English language relating to IAAA were sought electronically using OVID and MEDLINE (1972-2008). Studies identifying 30-day mortality were considered. Periaortic inflammation (PAI), hydronephrosis and 1-year mortality were obtained from studies with at least 1-year computed tomography (CT) follow-up. Outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared and analysed for statistical significance using Fisher's exact test. Results: The results were obtained from 35 studies comprising 999 patients and 21 studies with 121 patients who underwent OSR and EVAR, respectively. One-year CT follow-up was available for 124 and 52 patients from the two groups, respectively. Thirty-day mortality after OSR was 6% (95% confidence interval (CI); 6-13) and 2% (95% CI; 0-7) after EVAR (p = 0.1). At 1 year, PAI regressed in 73% (95% CI; 64-80) in the OSR group compared to 65% (95% CI; 49-77) of the EVAR group (p = 0.7). Conversely, inflammation progressed in 1% and 4%, respectively (p = 0.1). Forty-five patients undergoing OSR and 29 EVAR were found to have preoperative hydronephrosis. This regressed postoperatively in 69% (95% CI; 53.3-81.8) and 38% (95% CI; 20.6-57.7), respectively (p = 0.01). Hydronephrosis progressed in 9% of patients after OSR and in 21% after EVAR (p = 0.1). New-onset hydronephrosis developed in 6% undergoing OSR compared to 2% with EVAR (p = 0.2). One-year all-cause mortality after OSR was 14% (95% CI; 6-18) compared to 2% (95% CI; 0-13) after EVAR (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Either OSR or EVAR may be considered based on patient suitability. EVAR is associated with lower 1-year mortality compared to OSR. However, OSR may be preferred in those patients who have hydronephrosis and are deemed low risk. (C) 2009 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 297
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Open versus endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms
    不详
    LANCET, 2020, 395 (10230): : 1090 - 1090
  • [22] Systematic review of studies on elective endovascular repair versus conventional surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms
    van Heek, NT
    Ubbink, DT
    Legemate, DA
    RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) : 933 - 935
  • [23] Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Literature Review
    Azizzadeh, Ali
    Villa, Martin A.
    Miller, Charles C., III
    Estrera, Anthony L.
    Coogan, Sheila M.
    Safi, Hazim J.
    VASCULAR, 2008, 16 (04) : 219 - 224
  • [24] Open versus endovascular repair of primary infected thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Kritayakirana, Kritaya
    Narueponjirakul, Natawat
    Aimsupanimitr, Punthita
    Chaichote, Chonlathorn
    Uthaipaisanwong, Apinan
    Kittayarak, Chanapong
    VASCULAR, 2024, 32 (02) : 262 - 266
  • [25] Mortality Predictors of Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Elderly
    Lee, R.
    Locham, S.
    Malas, M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2017, 65 : S132 - S132
  • [26] Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Chinese Population
    Guo, Baolei
    Dong, Zhihui
    Fu, Weiguo
    Guo, Daqiao
    Xu, Xin
    Chen, Bin
    Jiang, Junhao
    Shi, Zhenyu
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 36 : 74 - 84
  • [27] Endovascular or open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Reinecke, Holger
    Donas, Konstantinos P.
    VASA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2016, 45 (04) : 342 - 342
  • [28] Endovascular vs open repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sadat, Umar
    Boyle, Jonathan R.
    Walsh, Stewart R.
    Tang, Tjun
    Varty, Kevin
    Hayes, Paul D.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 48 (01) : 227 - 236
  • [29] Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Comparative Study and Meta-Analysis of the Literature
    Kakkos, Stavros K.
    Papazoglou, Konstantinos O.
    Tsolakis, Ioannis A.
    Lampropoulos, George
    Papadoulas, Spyros I.
    Antoniadis, Pavlos N.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 49 (5-6) : 110 - 118
  • [30] Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine release in open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Rowlands, T
    Mavor, AID
    Gough, MJ
    Homer-Vanniasinkam, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 : 44 - 44