A Systematic Review of Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

被引:62
|
作者
Paravastu, S. C. V. [1 ]
Ghosh, J. [1 ]
Murray, D. [1 ]
Farquharson, F. G. [1 ]
Serracino-Inglott, F. [1 ]
Walker, M. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Infirm, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
关键词
Inflammatory aneurysm; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Surgery; Endoluminal therapy; EVAR; FOLLOW-UP; RETROPERITONEAL FIBROSIS; PERIANEURYSMAL FIBROSIS; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; REGRESSION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; GRAFT; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) have traditionally been treated by open surgical repair (OSR). Over the last decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been increasingly employed. The optimal treatment option for IAAA remains unclear. This article aims to evaluate and compare outcomes of OSR and EVAR in IAAA repair. Methods: All publications in the English language relating to IAAA were sought electronically using OVID and MEDLINE (1972-2008). Studies identifying 30-day mortality were considered. Periaortic inflammation (PAI), hydronephrosis and 1-year mortality were obtained from studies with at least 1-year computed tomography (CT) follow-up. Outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared and analysed for statistical significance using Fisher's exact test. Results: The results were obtained from 35 studies comprising 999 patients and 21 studies with 121 patients who underwent OSR and EVAR, respectively. One-year CT follow-up was available for 124 and 52 patients from the two groups, respectively. Thirty-day mortality after OSR was 6% (95% confidence interval (CI); 6-13) and 2% (95% CI; 0-7) after EVAR (p = 0.1). At 1 year, PAI regressed in 73% (95% CI; 64-80) in the OSR group compared to 65% (95% CI; 49-77) of the EVAR group (p = 0.7). Conversely, inflammation progressed in 1% and 4%, respectively (p = 0.1). Forty-five patients undergoing OSR and 29 EVAR were found to have preoperative hydronephrosis. This regressed postoperatively in 69% (95% CI; 53.3-81.8) and 38% (95% CI; 20.6-57.7), respectively (p = 0.01). Hydronephrosis progressed in 9% of patients after OSR and in 21% after EVAR (p = 0.1). New-onset hydronephrosis developed in 6% undergoing OSR compared to 2% with EVAR (p = 0.2). One-year all-cause mortality after OSR was 14% (95% CI; 6-18) compared to 2% (95% CI; 0-13) after EVAR (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Either OSR or EVAR may be considered based on patient suitability. EVAR is associated with lower 1-year mortality compared to OSR. However, OSR may be preferred in those patients who have hydronephrosis and are deemed low risk. (C) 2009 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 297
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endovascular repair versus open repair for inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Capoccia, Laura
    Riambau, Vicente
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (04):
  • [2] Cytokines as biomarkers of inflammatory response after open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review
    Diamantis I Tsilimigras
    Fragiska Sigala
    Georgios Karaolanis
    Ioannis Ntanasis-stathopoulos
    Eleftherios Spartalis
    Michael Spartalis
    Nikolaos Patelis
    Alexandros Papalampros
    Chandler Long
    Demetrios Moris
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 2018, 39 : 1164 - 1175
  • [3] Cytokines as biomarkers of inflammatory response after open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review
    Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.
    Sigala, Fragiska
    Karaolanis, Georgios
    Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis
    Spartalis, Eleftherios
    Spartalis, Michael
    Patelis, Nikolaos
    Papalampros, Alexandros
    Long, Chandler
    Moris, Demetrios
    ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 39 (07): : 1164 - 1175
  • [4] Comparison of Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms A Review
    Duarte, Maddalena Pizzirusso
    Maldjian, Catherine T.
    Laskowski, Igor
    CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2009, 17 (03) : 112 - 114
  • [5] Open and endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review
    Belczak, Sergio Quilici
    Lanziotti, Luiz
    Botelho, Yuri
    Aun, Ricardo
    da Silva, Erasmo Simao
    Puech-Leao, Pedro
    de Luccia, Nelson
    CLINICS, 2014, 69 (09) : 641 - 646
  • [6] Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: Endovascular repair versus open surgery-systematic review
    Visser, Jacob J.
    van Sambeek, Marc R. H. M.
    Hamza, Taye H.
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    Bosch, Johanna L.
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (01) : 122 - 129
  • [7] A Comparative Study of Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Kakkos, Stavros K.
    Papazoglou, Konstantinos O.
    Tsolakis, Ioannis A.
    Lampropoulos, George
    Papadoulas, Spyros I.
    Antoniadis, Pavlos N.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (05) : 40S - 40S
  • [8] Outcomes of open and endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Duque Santos, Africa
    Reyes Valdivia, Andres
    Romero Lozano, Maria Asuncion
    Aracil Sanus, Enrique
    Ocana Guaita, Julia
    Gandarias, Claudio
    VASCULAR, 2018, 26 (02) : 203 - 208
  • [9] Open versus Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Speicher, Paul J.
    Barbas, Andrew S.
    Mureebe, Leila
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 28 (05) : 1249 - 1257
  • [10] Endovascular repair versus open repair in the treatment of ruptured aortic aneurysms: a systematic review
    Amato, Bruno
    Fugetto, Francesco
    Compagna, Rita
    Zurlo, Valeria
    Barbetta, Andrea
    Petrella, Giuseppe
    Aprea, Giovanni
    Danzi, Michele
    Rocca, Aldo
    de Franciscis, Stefano
    Serra, Raffaele
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2019, 74 (06) : 472 - 480