Consistency between Infrastructure Rating Systems in Measuring Sustainability

被引:3
|
作者
Oluwalaiye, Oluwatobi [1 ]
Ozbek, Mehmet E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Construct Management, Campus Delivery 1584, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
transportation sustainability rating system; Envision; INVEST; GreenLITES;
D O I
10.3390/infrastructures4010009
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To date, several transportation sustainability rating systems (TSRS) have been developed to measure and promote sustainability. However, studies show that these TSRS have not been developed with a consistent sustainability scope. This raises the question of the consistency of these TSRS in measuring the sustainability of transportation projects. This study assesses how three prominent TSRS (Envision, INVEST, and GreenLITES) rate the sustainability performance of transportation projects with the goal of determining if a consistency exists in the way these three TSRS measure sustainability. These three TSRS are applied to five transportation projects. The results showed that these three rating tools assess and reward sustainability practices differently. Additionally, results suggest that it may be easier for a project to get awarded in GreenLITES compared to the other two TSRS. Notwithstanding all of the above, a consistency was noted in all three rating systems in the quality of life/social performance of projects. This study helps to inform stakeholders in the transportation industry on how transportation projects perform when run through each of these rating systems. This will help stakeholders to make informed decisions with respect to choosing one (or more) TSRS to assess their projects with and evaluating the results obtained from such TSRS.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of existing sustainable infrastructure rating systems for their application in developing countries
    Manuel Diaz-Sarachaga, Jose
    Jato-Espino, Daniel
    Alsulami, Badr
    Castro-Fresno, Daniel
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 71 : 491 - 502
  • [42] Rating the sustainability of nations
    Zoeteman, K
    ECOSYSTEM HEALTH, 2000, 6 (04) : 237 - 245
  • [43] FRAMEWORK FOR MEASURING SUSTAINABILITY BETWEEN ENERGY SOURCES
    da Silva, Ricardo Moreira
    Mendes Primo, Marcos Andre
    INTERCIENCIA, 2013, 38 (11) : 760 - 768
  • [44] Creating Inclusive Cities: A Review of Indicators for Measuring Sustainability for Urban Infrastructure in India
    Bhattacharya, Shrimoyee
    Patro, Sonali Anusree
    Rathi, Sujaya
    ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION ASIA, 2016, 7 (02) : 214 - 233
  • [45] Disagreement Between Hospital Rating Systems: Measuring the Correlation of Multiple Benchmarks and Developing a Quality Composite Rank
    Hota, Bala
    Webb, Thomas
    Chatrathi, Avanthi
    McAninch, Elizabeth
    Lateef, Omar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2020, 35 (03) : 222 - 230
  • [46] Development of a metric system measuring infrastructure sustainability: Empirical studies of Hong Kong
    Liu, Bingsheng
    Xue, Bin
    Chen, Xingbin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 278
  • [47] Measuring Skin Color: Consistency, Comparability, and Meaningfulness of Rating Scale Scores and Handheld Device Readings
    Gordon, Rachel A.
    Branigan, Amelia R.
    Khan, Mariya Adnan
    Nunez, Johanna G.
    JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY, 2022, 10 (02) : 337 - 364
  • [48] The Dialogue between Structural Interventions and Sustainability Criteria in Rating Systems for Cultural Heritage: The Experience of GBC Historic Building
    Bertagni, Stefano
    Boarin, Paola
    Zuppiroli, Marco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2020, 14 (01) : 139 - 161
  • [49] Measuring consistency
    Washburne, C
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1927, 18 : 612 - 616
  • [50] Measuring sustainability at universities by means of the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Rating System (STARS): early findings from STARS data
    Monika Urbanski
    Walter Leal Filho
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2015, 17 : 209 - 220