Consistency between Infrastructure Rating Systems in Measuring Sustainability

被引:3
|
作者
Oluwalaiye, Oluwatobi [1 ]
Ozbek, Mehmet E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Construct Management, Campus Delivery 1584, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
transportation sustainability rating system; Envision; INVEST; GreenLITES;
D O I
10.3390/infrastructures4010009
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To date, several transportation sustainability rating systems (TSRS) have been developed to measure and promote sustainability. However, studies show that these TSRS have not been developed with a consistent sustainability scope. This raises the question of the consistency of these TSRS in measuring the sustainability of transportation projects. This study assesses how three prominent TSRS (Envision, INVEST, and GreenLITES) rate the sustainability performance of transportation projects with the goal of determining if a consistency exists in the way these three TSRS measure sustainability. These three TSRS are applied to five transportation projects. The results showed that these three rating tools assess and reward sustainability practices differently. Additionally, results suggest that it may be easier for a project to get awarded in GreenLITES compared to the other two TSRS. Notwithstanding all of the above, a consistency was noted in all three rating systems in the quality of life/social performance of projects. This study helps to inform stakeholders in the transportation industry on how transportation projects perform when run through each of these rating systems. This will help stakeholders to make informed decisions with respect to choosing one (or more) TSRS to assess their projects with and evaluating the results obtained from such TSRS.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sustainability Rating Systems for Historic Buildings: A Systematic Review
    Karimi, Farzaneh
    Valibeig, Nima
    Memarian, Gholamhossein
    Kamari, Aliakbar
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [22] A review of emissions on pavement materials and sustainability rating systems
    Castro, C.
    Sabogal, D.
    Fernandez, W.
    REVISTA INGENIERIA DE CONSTRUCCION, 2022, 37 (02): : 280 - 291
  • [23] Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems
    Berardi U.
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2013, 15 (6) : 1573 - 1591
  • [24] Measuring Systems and Architectures: A Sustainability Perspective
    Cabot, Jordi
    Capilla, Rafael
    Carrillo, Carlos
    Muccini, Henry
    Penzenstadler, Birgit
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 2019, 36 (03) : 98 - 100
  • [25] A framework for measuring sustainability in healthcare systems
    AlJaberi, Omar Awad
    Hussain, Matloub
    Drake, Paul R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (04) : 276 - 285
  • [26] Improving the sustainability of automatic measuring systems
    Bordini, Eleonora
    Glass International, 2024, 47 (03): : 57 - 58
  • [27] MEASURING CONSISTENCY AND INCONSISTENCY OF PAIR COMPARISON SYSTEMS
    Ramik, Jaroslav
    Vlach, Milan
    KYBERNETIKA, 2013, 49 (03) : 465 - 486
  • [28] Reporting Systems for Sustainability: What Are They Measuring?
    Kathryn M. Davidson
    Social Indicators Research, 2011, 100 : 351 - 365
  • [29] Reporting Systems for Sustainability: What Are They Measuring?
    Davidson, Kathryn M.
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2011, 100 (02) : 351 - 365
  • [30] Resilience and Sustainability in Underground Transportation Infrastructure: Literature Review and Assessment of Envision Rating System
    Rodriguez-Nikl, Tonatiuh
    Mazari, Mehran
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE 2019: LEADING RESILIENT COMMUNITIES THROUGH THE 21ST CENTURY, 2019, : 447 - 457