Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality and Gleason 7 Disease Differences in Prostate Cancer Outcomes Between Cases With Gleason 4+3 and Gleason 3+4 Tumors in a Population Based Cohort

被引:127
|
作者
Wright, Jonathan L. [1 ,3 ]
Salinas, Claudia A. [3 ]
Lin, Daniel W. [3 ]
Kolb, Suzanne [3 ]
Koopmeiners, Joseph [3 ]
Feng, Ziding [3 ]
Stanford, Janet L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2009年 / 182卷 / 06期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; mortality; disease progression; outcome assessment (health care); SURROGATE END-POINT; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; MEN; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; PATTERN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Reports of biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer primary therapy show differences between Gleason 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 tumors. To our knowledge these findings have not been explored for prostate cancer specific mortality. In this population based cohort we determined prostate cancer outcomes at different Gleason scores, particularly the different Gleason 7 patterns. Materials and Methods: Men 40 to 64 years old who were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1993 and 1996 in King County, Washington comprised the cohort. Recurrence/progression was determined by followup survey and medical record review. Mortality and cause of death were obtained from the Seattle-Puget Sound Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry. HRs for outcomes were determined by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: In 753 men with prostate cancer 65 prostate cancer specific deaths occurred during a median followup of 13.2 years. The 10-year prostate cancer specific survival rate for Gleason 6 or less, 3 + 4, 4 + 3 and 8-10 disease was 98.4%, 92.1%, 76.5% and 69.9%, respectively. Compared to patients with Gleason 3 + 4 disease those with Gleason 4 + 3 tumors were at increased risk for prostate cancer specific mortality in the unadjusted and multivariate models (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.26-6.18 and HR 2.12, 95% CI 0.87-5.17, respectively). In men undergoing curative therapy with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy there was an increased risk of recurrence/progression (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.08-4.08) and prostate cancer specific mortality (HR 3.17, 95% CI 1.04-9.67) in those with Gleason 4 + 3 vs 3 + 4 tumors in the multivariate models. No difference in prostate cancer specific mortality was seen between Gleason 4 + 3 and 8-10 tumors. Conclusions: Gleason 7 prostate cancer shows heterogeneous behavior with Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 tumors conferring different prostate cancer specific mortality. These data provide important information for counseling patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer on the natural history of the disease and may inform treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:2702 / 2707
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gleason Score 3+4=7 Prostate Cancer with Minimal Pattern 4 Identified in Prostate Needle Biopsy Barely has Worse Pathological Outcomes
    Serrano, Antonio
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Ren, Qinghu
    Huang, Hongying
    Park, Kyung
    Flaifel, Abdallah
    Deng, Fangming
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2020, 100 (SUPPL 1) : 969 - 971
  • [42] SIGNIFICANCE OF TERTIARY PATTERN 5 IN PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSIES WITH GLEASON SCORE OF 3+4 OR 4+3 PROSTATE CANCER: PATHOLOGIC CORRELATION FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Shah, Rajal B.
    Daignault, Stephanie
    Kunju, L. P.
    Wood, David P., Jr.
    Wei, John T.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 754 - 754
  • [43] Significance of Tertiary Pattern 5 in Prostate Needle Biopsies with Gleason Score of 3+4 or 4+3 Prostate Cancer: Pathologic Correlation Following Radical Prostatectomy
    Shah, R. B.
    Daignault, S.
    Kunju, L. P.
    Wood, D. P., Jr.
    Wei, J. T.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2009, 89 : 193A - 193A
  • [44] Significance of Tertiary Pattern 5 in Prostate Needle Biopsies with Gleason Score of 3+4 or 4+3 Prostate Cancer: Pathologic Correlation Following Radical Prostatectomy
    Shah, R. B.
    Daignault, S.
    Kunju, L. P.
    Wood, D. P., Jr.
    Wei, J. T.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 22 : 193A - 193A
  • [45] Comparative influence of cribriform growth and percent Gleason 4 in prostatic biopsies with Gleason 3+4 cancer
    Czaja, Rebecca C.
    Tarima, Sergey
    Wu, Ruizhe
    Palagnmonthip, Watchareepohn
    Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2021, 52
  • [46] Prostate cancer: Predominance of Gleason pattern 4 predicts mortality
    Payton S.
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2009, 6 (9) : 462 - 462
  • [47] A prospective study of a urine and plasma biomarker test for the prediction of gleason ≥3+4 prostate cancer in a mixed cohort
    Poulsen, Mads Hvid
    Feddersen, Soren
    Albitar, Maher
    Poulsen, Charlotte Aaberg
    Lund, Martin
    Pedersen, Torben Brochner
    Mortensen, Mike Allan
    Lund, Lars
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 54 (04) : 323 - 327
  • [48] Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer
    Flood, Trevor A.
    Schieda, Nicola
    Keefe, Daniel T.
    Breau, Rodney H.
    Morash, Chris
    Hogan, Kevin
    Belanger, Eric C.
    Mai, Kien T.
    Robertson, Susan J.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 (03) : 313 - 319
  • [49] Functional validation of metabolic genes that distinguish Gleason 3 from Gleason 4 prostate cancer foci
    Roberto, Domenica
    Selvarajah, Shamini
    Park, Paul C.
    Berman, David
    Venkateswaran, Vasundara
    PROSTATE, 2019, 79 (15): : 1777 - 1788
  • [50] COMPARISON OF BIOCHEMICAL RELAPSE-FREE SURVIVAL BETWEEN PRIMARY GLEASON SCORE 3 AND PRIMARY GLEASON SCORE 4 FOR BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE 7 PROSTATE CANCER
    Burdick, Michael J.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ulchaker, James
    Angermeier, Kenneth
    Altman, Andrew
    Chehade, Nabil
    Mahadevan, Arul
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (05): : 1439 - 1445