Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality and Gleason 7 Disease Differences in Prostate Cancer Outcomes Between Cases With Gleason 4+3 and Gleason 3+4 Tumors in a Population Based Cohort

被引:127
|
作者
Wright, Jonathan L. [1 ,3 ]
Salinas, Claudia A. [3 ]
Lin, Daniel W. [3 ]
Kolb, Suzanne [3 ]
Koopmeiners, Joseph [3 ]
Feng, Ziding [3 ]
Stanford, Janet L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2009年 / 182卷 / 06期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; mortality; disease progression; outcome assessment (health care); SURROGATE END-POINT; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; MEN; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; PATTERN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Reports of biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer primary therapy show differences between Gleason 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 tumors. To our knowledge these findings have not been explored for prostate cancer specific mortality. In this population based cohort we determined prostate cancer outcomes at different Gleason scores, particularly the different Gleason 7 patterns. Materials and Methods: Men 40 to 64 years old who were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1993 and 1996 in King County, Washington comprised the cohort. Recurrence/progression was determined by followup survey and medical record review. Mortality and cause of death were obtained from the Seattle-Puget Sound Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry. HRs for outcomes were determined by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: In 753 men with prostate cancer 65 prostate cancer specific deaths occurred during a median followup of 13.2 years. The 10-year prostate cancer specific survival rate for Gleason 6 or less, 3 + 4, 4 + 3 and 8-10 disease was 98.4%, 92.1%, 76.5% and 69.9%, respectively. Compared to patients with Gleason 3 + 4 disease those with Gleason 4 + 3 tumors were at increased risk for prostate cancer specific mortality in the unadjusted and multivariate models (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.26-6.18 and HR 2.12, 95% CI 0.87-5.17, respectively). In men undergoing curative therapy with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy there was an increased risk of recurrence/progression (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.08-4.08) and prostate cancer specific mortality (HR 3.17, 95% CI 1.04-9.67) in those with Gleason 4 + 3 vs 3 + 4 tumors in the multivariate models. No difference in prostate cancer specific mortality was seen between Gleason 4 + 3 and 8-10 tumors. Conclusions: Gleason 7 prostate cancer shows heterogeneous behavior with Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 tumors conferring different prostate cancer specific mortality. These data provide important information for counseling patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer on the natural history of the disease and may inform treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:2702 / 2707
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biochemical outcome for hormone-naive patients with Gleason score 3+4 versus 4+3 prostate cancer undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy
    Merrick, GS
    Butler, WM
    Galbreath, RW
    Lief, JH
    Adamovich, E
    UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (01) : 98 - 103
  • [33] Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3+4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort
    Wong, Lih-Ming
    Tang, Vincent
    Peters, Justin
    Costello, Anthony
    Corcoran, Niall
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 82 - 87
  • [34] Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3+4
    Kim, Hwanik
    Kim, Jung Kwon
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 1825 - 1830
  • [35] CONTEMPORARY PATIENTS WITH BIOPSY GLEASON 3+4 PROSTATE CANCER: ELIGIBILITY FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Kwon, Ohseong
    Lee, Hakmin
    Jo, Jung Ki
    Lee, Young Ik
    Oh, Jong Jin
    Lee, Sangchul
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E515 - E515
  • [36] Do Specific Gleason Pattern 4 Morphologies Detected on Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS)-Guided Biopsies Predict Upgrading or Upstaging in Gleason Score 3+4=7 Prostate Cancer?
    Hogan, Kevin
    Robertson, Susan J.
    Schieda, Nicola
    Mai, Kien T.
    Keefe, Daniel T.
    Belanger, Eric C.
    Breau, Rodney H.
    Morash, Chris
    Flood, Trevor A.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2016, 29 : 239A - 239A
  • [37] Do Specific Gleason Pattern 4 Morphologies Detected on Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS)-Guided Biopsies Predict Upgrading or Upstaging in Gleason Score 3+4=7 Prostate Cancer?
    Hogan, Kevin
    Robertson, Susan J.
    Schieda, Nicola
    Mai, Kien T.
    Keefe, Daniel T.
    Belanger, Eric C.
    Breau, Rodney H.
    Morash, Chris
    Flood, Trevor A.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 96 : 239A - 239A
  • [38] Predictive role of PI-RADSv2 and ADC parameters in differentiating Gleason pattern 3+4 and 4+3 prostate cancer
    Alessandrino, Francesco
    Taghipour, Mehdi
    Hassanzadeh, Elmira
    Ziaei, Alireza
    Vangel, Mark
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (01) : 279 - 285
  • [39] Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance Imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3+4
    Kim, Hwanik
    Kim, Jung Kwon
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Ye, Changhee
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 64 - 65
  • [40] Gleason Score 3+4=7 Prostate Cancer with Minimal Pattern 4 Identified in Prostate Needle Biopsy Barely has Worse Pathological Outcomes
    Serrano, Antonio
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Ren, Qinghu
    Huang, Hongying
    Park, Kyung
    Flaifel, Abdallah
    Deng, Fangming
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (SUPPL 2) : 969 - 971