Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality and Gleason 7 Disease Differences in Prostate Cancer Outcomes Between Cases With Gleason 4+3 and Gleason 3+4 Tumors in a Population Based Cohort

被引:127
|
作者
Wright, Jonathan L. [1 ,3 ]
Salinas, Claudia A. [3 ]
Lin, Daniel W. [3 ]
Kolb, Suzanne [3 ]
Koopmeiners, Joseph [3 ]
Feng, Ziding [3 ]
Stanford, Janet L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2009年 / 182卷 / 06期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; mortality; disease progression; outcome assessment (health care); SURROGATE END-POINT; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; MEN; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; PATTERN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Reports of biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer primary therapy show differences between Gleason 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 tumors. To our knowledge these findings have not been explored for prostate cancer specific mortality. In this population based cohort we determined prostate cancer outcomes at different Gleason scores, particularly the different Gleason 7 patterns. Materials and Methods: Men 40 to 64 years old who were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1993 and 1996 in King County, Washington comprised the cohort. Recurrence/progression was determined by followup survey and medical record review. Mortality and cause of death were obtained from the Seattle-Puget Sound Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry. HRs for outcomes were determined by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: In 753 men with prostate cancer 65 prostate cancer specific deaths occurred during a median followup of 13.2 years. The 10-year prostate cancer specific survival rate for Gleason 6 or less, 3 + 4, 4 + 3 and 8-10 disease was 98.4%, 92.1%, 76.5% and 69.9%, respectively. Compared to patients with Gleason 3 + 4 disease those with Gleason 4 + 3 tumors were at increased risk for prostate cancer specific mortality in the unadjusted and multivariate models (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.26-6.18 and HR 2.12, 95% CI 0.87-5.17, respectively). In men undergoing curative therapy with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy there was an increased risk of recurrence/progression (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.08-4.08) and prostate cancer specific mortality (HR 3.17, 95% CI 1.04-9.67) in those with Gleason 4 + 3 vs 3 + 4 tumors in the multivariate models. No difference in prostate cancer specific mortality was seen between Gleason 4 + 3 and 8-10 tumors. Conclusions: Gleason 7 prostate cancer shows heterogeneous behavior with Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 tumors conferring different prostate cancer specific mortality. These data provide important information for counseling patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer on the natural history of the disease and may inform treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:2702 / 2707
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality and Gleason 7 Disease Differences in Prostate Cancer Outcomes Between Cases With Gleason 4+3 and Gleason 3+4 Tumors in a Population Based Cohort COMMENT
    Dahm, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06): : 2707 - 2707
  • [2] Gleason Score and Lethal Prostate Cancer: Does 3+4=4+3?
    Stark, Jennifer R.
    Perner, Sven
    Stampfer, Meir J.
    Sinnott, Jennifer A.
    Finn, Stephen
    Eisenstein, Anna S.
    Ma, Jing
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Kurth, Tobias
    Loda, Massimo
    Giovannucci, Edward L.
    Rubin, Mark A.
    Mucci, Lorelei A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (21) : 3459 - 3464
  • [3] Gleason 4+3 Versus Gleason 3+4 Prostate Cancer: Still A Worse Prognostic Indicator Despite the Introduction of RAPC
    Broe, M.
    Forde, J.
    Burke, M.
    Shakeel, I.
    Lennon, G.
    Galvin, D.
    Mulvin, D.
    Quinlan, D.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 184 : S384 - S384
  • [4] Incidence of metastasis and prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis in Gleason 3+4 versus 4+3 prostate cancer
    Kamel, Mohamed H.
    Khalil, Mahmoud I.
    Alobuia, Wilson M.
    Su, Joseph
    Davis, Rodney
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2018, 10 (02) : 203 - 208
  • [5] Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: Is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4+3 and 3+4 independent of the number of involved cores?
    Makarov, DV
    Sanderson, H
    Partin, AW
    Epstein, JI
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (06): : 2440 - 2442
  • [6] Characteristics and outcome of prostate cancer patients with overall biopsy Gleason score 3+4=7 and highest Gleason score 3+4=7 or >3+4=7
    Verhoef, Esther I.
    Kweldam, Charlotte F.
    Kuemmerlin, Intan P.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Incrocci, Luca
    van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    van Leenders, Geert J.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 72 (05) : 760 - 765
  • [7] Molecular Prognostic Testing on Gleason 3+4 Prostate Cancer
    Lin, Kirk
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2020, 100 (SUPPL 1) : 922 - 923
  • [8] In Gleason 3+4 Prostate Cancer, Is Cribriform Growth More Influential Than Percent Gleason 4?
    Iczkowski, Kenneth
    Czaja, Rebecca
    Tarima, Sergey
    Wu, Ruizhe
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2021, 101 (SUPPL 1) : 569 - 569
  • [9] In Gleason 3+4 Prostate Cancer, Is Cribriform Growth More Influential Than Percent Gleason 4?
    Iczkowski, Kenneth
    Czaja, Rebecca
    Tarima, Sergey
    Wu, Ruizhe
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2021, 34 (SUPPL 2) : 569 - 569
  • [10] Molecular Prognostic Testing on Gleason 3+4 Prostate Cancer
    Lin, Kirk
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (SUPPL 2) : 922 - 923