Multicenter Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the Vitek 2 System

被引:15
|
作者
Humphries, Romney [1 ,6 ]
Campeau, Shelley [1 ,7 ]
Davis, Thomas E. [2 ]
Nagaro, Kristin J. [2 ]
LaBombardi, Vincent J. [3 ]
Franklin, Simone [4 ]
Heimbach, Lisa [5 ]
Dwivedi, Hari P. [4 ]
机构
[1] UCLA Hlth Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] NewYork Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, NY USA
[4] BioMerieux Inc, Hazelwood, MO USA
[5] BioMerieux Inc, Durham, NC USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[7] Accelerate Diagnost Inc, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
automated susceptibility testing; Vitek; 2; Enterobacterales; Pseudomonas; ceftazidime-avibactam; CZA; LACTAMASE INHIBITOR COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01870-20
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In this multisite study, Vitek 2 AST-Gram-Negative Ceftazidime/Avibactam test results for 1,073 isolates (866 Enterobacterales and 207 Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were compared to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) reference method. The results were analyzed for essential agreement (EA), category agreement (CA), major error rates, and very major error rates following FDA/ISO performance criteria using the FDA-recognized CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints (sensitive [S], <= 8/4mg/ ml; resistant [R], >= 16/4 mu g/ml). The overall EA was 94.5% (1,014/1,073) and CA was 98.7% (1,059/1,073). No very major errors were reported. The major error rate was 1.4% (14/998). Out of 14 major errors, 9 were within EA. Based on the EA and lack of an intermediate category for ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), the adjusted major error rate for FDA criteria was 0.5% (5/998). The performance for ISO criteria after error resolutions included EA of 94.5% (1,014/1,073), CA of 98.9% (1,061/1,073), major error of 1.2% (12/998), and no very major error. Vitek 2 met the ISO and FDA criteria of >= 95% reproducibility and >= 95% quality control (QC) results within acceptable ranges for QC organisms. Vitek 2 overall performance for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa met or exceeded the FDA and ISO performance criteria; thus, it is a reliable alternative to the BMD reference method for routine CZA susceptibility testing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Evaluation of Antibiotic Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa via Vitek 2 Authomated System
    Ak, Sibel
    Yildiz, Fatma
    Gunduz, Ayten
    Koroglu, Mehmet
    GAZI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (02): : 62 - 64
  • [32] Comparative In Vitro and In Vivo Efficacies of Human Simulated Doses of Ceftazidime and Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Crandon, Jared L.
    Schuck, Virna J.
    Banevicius, Mary Anne
    Beaudoin, Marie-Eve
    Nichols, Wright W.
    Tanudra, M. Angela
    Nicolau, David P.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 56 (12) : 6137 - 6146
  • [33] A Selective Culture Medium for Screening Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (vol 58, e00965-20, 2020)
    Sadek, Mustafa
    Poirel, Laurent
    Tinguely, Camille
    Nordmann, Patrice
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (12)
  • [34] In Vitro Susceptibility to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparator Antimicrobial Agents of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolates
    Lim, Tze-Peng
    Ho, Jun-Yuan
    Teo, Jocelyn Qi-Min
    Sim, James Heng-Chiak
    Tan, Si-Hui
    Tan, Thuan-Tong
    Kwa, Andrea Lay-Hoon
    MICROORGANISMS, 2023, 11 (09)
  • [35] In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Central Europe and Israel, 2014-2017 and 2018
    Kristof, Katalin
    Adamkova, Vaclava
    Adler, Amos
    Gospodarek-Komkowska, Eugenia
    Rafila, Alexandru
    Billova, Sabina
    Mozejko-Pastewka, Barbara
    Kiss, Ferenc
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 101 (01)
  • [36] Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of Etest Meropenem-Vaborbactam (bioMerieux) for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales (Enterobacteriaceae) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Jean, Sophonie
    Garrett, Sheri
    Anglade, Claire
    Bridon, Laurence
    Davies, Leanne
    Garner, Omai B.
    Richards, Jennifer
    Wallace, Meghan
    Wootton, Mandy
    Burnham, Carey-Ann D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (01)
  • [37] Successful ceftazidime-avibactam therapy in a patient with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infective endocarditis
    Lima, Olalla
    Sousa, Adrian
    Filgueira, Anton
    Otero, Anton
    Cabaleiro, Andrea
    Martinez-Lamas, Lucia
    Vasallo, Francisco
    Perez-Rodriguez, M. Teresa
    INFECTION, 2022, 50 (04) : 1039 - 1041
  • [38] In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from hospitalised patients in Germany
    Kresken, Michael
    Korte-Berwanger, Miriam
    Pfennigwerth, Niels
    Gatermann, Soren G.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2021, 25 : 337 - 338
  • [39] Accuracy of β-lactam susceptibility testing results from VITEK and VITEK 2 systems when testing Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    LaBombardi, V.
    Rekasius, V.
    Schreckenberger, P.
    Jones, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 29 : S460 - S460
  • [40] Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from sputum of patients with cystic fibrosis demonstrates a high rate of susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam
    Atkin, Stan D.
    Abid, Shadaan
    Foster, Michael
    Bose, Moumita
    Keller, Ashley
    Hollaway, Rita
    Sader, Helio S.
    Greenberg, David E.
    Finklea, James D.
    Castanheira, Mariana
    Jain, Raksha
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2018, 11 : 1499 - 1510