Multicenter Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the Vitek 2 System

被引:15
|
作者
Humphries, Romney [1 ,6 ]
Campeau, Shelley [1 ,7 ]
Davis, Thomas E. [2 ]
Nagaro, Kristin J. [2 ]
LaBombardi, Vincent J. [3 ]
Franklin, Simone [4 ]
Heimbach, Lisa [5 ]
Dwivedi, Hari P. [4 ]
机构
[1] UCLA Hlth Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] NewYork Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, NY USA
[4] BioMerieux Inc, Hazelwood, MO USA
[5] BioMerieux Inc, Durham, NC USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[7] Accelerate Diagnost Inc, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
automated susceptibility testing; Vitek; 2; Enterobacterales; Pseudomonas; ceftazidime-avibactam; CZA; LACTAMASE INHIBITOR COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01870-20
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In this multisite study, Vitek 2 AST-Gram-Negative Ceftazidime/Avibactam test results for 1,073 isolates (866 Enterobacterales and 207 Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were compared to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) reference method. The results were analyzed for essential agreement (EA), category agreement (CA), major error rates, and very major error rates following FDA/ISO performance criteria using the FDA-recognized CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints (sensitive [S], <= 8/4mg/ ml; resistant [R], >= 16/4 mu g/ml). The overall EA was 94.5% (1,014/1,073) and CA was 98.7% (1,059/1,073). No very major errors were reported. The major error rate was 1.4% (14/998). Out of 14 major errors, 9 were within EA. Based on the EA and lack of an intermediate category for ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), the adjusted major error rate for FDA criteria was 0.5% (5/998). The performance for ISO criteria after error resolutions included EA of 94.5% (1,014/1,073), CA of 98.9% (1,061/1,073), major error of 1.2% (12/998), and no very major error. Vitek 2 met the ISO and FDA criteria of >= 95% reproducibility and >= 95% quality control (QC) results within acceptable ranges for QC organisms. Vitek 2 overall performance for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa met or exceeded the FDA and ISO performance criteria; thus, it is a reliable alternative to the BMD reference method for routine CZA susceptibility testing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Verification of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing Methods against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Shields, Ryan K.
    Clancy, Cornelius J.
    Pasculle, A. William
    Press, Ellen G.
    Haidar, Ghady
    Hao, Binghua
    Chen, Liang
    Kreiswirth, Barry N.
    Nguyen, M. Hong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 56 (02)
  • [22] Performance Evaluation of VITEK 2 System in Meropenem Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates
    Acuner, Ibrahim Cagatay
    Bayramoglu, Gulcin
    Birinci, Asuman
    Cihan, Cigdem Cekic
    Bek, Yuksel
    Durupinar, Belma
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2011, 45 (03): : 411 - 421
  • [23] Susceptibility of Meropenem-Resistant and/or Carbapenemase-Producing Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales (Enterobacteriaceae) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam as Assessed by In Vitro Testing Methods
    Cortazzo, Venere
    Posteraro, Brunella
    Menchinelli, Giulia
    Liotti, Flora Marzia
    D'Inzeo, Tiziana
    Fiori, Barbara
    Luzzaro, Francesco
    Sanguinetti, Maurizio
    Spanu, Teresa
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (08):
  • [24] Feasibility of Using Ceftazidime-Avibactam as a Therapeutic Option for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Based on Its Susceptibility Profile
    Priyadarshi, Ketan
    Dhandapani, Sarumathi
    Sivaradjy, Monika
    Shanmugam, Lakshmi
    Sastry, Apurba S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [25] Evaluation of the In vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Ceftazidime-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates
    Bilgin, Melek
    Basbulut, Ese
    Isler, Hacer
    FLORA INFEKSIYON HASTALIKLARI VE KLINIK MIKROBIYOLOJI DERGISI, 2021, 26 (04): : 713 - 719
  • [26] Susceptibility testing of pseudomonas aeruginosa by the Vitek 2 system: A comparison with Etest results
    Saegeman, V
    Huynen, P
    Colaert, J
    Melin, P
    Verhaegen, J
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2005, 60 (01): : 3 - 9
  • [27] Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Pitart, C.
    Marco, F.
    Keating, T. A.
    Nichols, W. W.
    Vila, J.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 59 (06) : 3059 - 3065
  • [28] Reduced Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility in KPC-ProducingKlebsiella pneumoniaeFrom Patients Without Ceftazidime-Avibactam Use History - A Multicenter Study in China
    Cui, Xiaoyan
    Shan, Bin
    Zhang, Xue
    Qu, Fen
    Jia, Wei
    Huang, Bin
    Yu, Hua
    Tang, Yi-Wei
    Chen, Liang
    Du, Hong
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [29] Ceftazidime-Avibactam Versus Colistin for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: A Multicenter Cohort Study
    Almangour, Thamer A.
    Alkherb, Zakiyah
    Ghonem, Leen
    Al Musawa, Mohammed
    Almohaizeie, Abdullah
    Almuhisen, Sara
    Alharbi, Aminah
    Damfu, Nader
    Aljefri, Doaa
    Alghaith, Jeelan
    Alfozan, Awaly
    Alghamdi, Ahlam
    Aljabri, Ahmad
    Alhifany, Abdullah A.
    Alessa, Mohammed
    Alsowaida, Yazed Saleh
    PHARMACEUTICALS, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [30] Performance Evaluation of the Gradient Diffusion Strip Method and Disk Diffusion Method for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Dual-Center Study
    Zhang, Jingjia
    Li, Gang
    Zhang, Ge
    Kang, Wei
    Duan, Simeng
    Wang, Tong
    Li, Jin
    Huangfu, Zhiru
    Yang, Qiwen
    Xu, Yingchun
    Jia, Wei
    Sun, Hongli
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 12