Multicenter Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the Vitek 2 System

被引:15
|
作者
Humphries, Romney [1 ,6 ]
Campeau, Shelley [1 ,7 ]
Davis, Thomas E. [2 ]
Nagaro, Kristin J. [2 ]
LaBombardi, Vincent J. [3 ]
Franklin, Simone [4 ]
Heimbach, Lisa [5 ]
Dwivedi, Hari P. [4 ]
机构
[1] UCLA Hlth Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] NewYork Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, NY USA
[4] BioMerieux Inc, Hazelwood, MO USA
[5] BioMerieux Inc, Durham, NC USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[7] Accelerate Diagnost Inc, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
automated susceptibility testing; Vitek; 2; Enterobacterales; Pseudomonas; ceftazidime-avibactam; CZA; LACTAMASE INHIBITOR COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01870-20
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In this multisite study, Vitek 2 AST-Gram-Negative Ceftazidime/Avibactam test results for 1,073 isolates (866 Enterobacterales and 207 Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were compared to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) reference method. The results were analyzed for essential agreement (EA), category agreement (CA), major error rates, and very major error rates following FDA/ISO performance criteria using the FDA-recognized CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints (sensitive [S], <= 8/4mg/ ml; resistant [R], >= 16/4 mu g/ml). The overall EA was 94.5% (1,014/1,073) and CA was 98.7% (1,059/1,073). No very major errors were reported. The major error rate was 1.4% (14/998). Out of 14 major errors, 9 were within EA. Based on the EA and lack of an intermediate category for ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), the adjusted major error rate for FDA criteria was 0.5% (5/998). The performance for ISO criteria after error resolutions included EA of 94.5% (1,014/1,073), CA of 98.9% (1,061/1,073), major error of 1.2% (12/998), and no very major error. Vitek 2 met the ISO and FDA criteria of >= 95% reproducibility and >= 95% quality control (QC) results within acceptable ranges for QC organisms. Vitek 2 overall performance for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa met or exceeded the FDA and ISO performance criteria; thus, it is a reliable alternative to the BMD reference method for routine CZA susceptibility testing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of the Etest for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales (Enterobacteriaceae) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa toward Ceftazidime-Avibactam
    Kresken, Michael
    Koerber-Irrgang, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 56 (09)
  • [2] Comparative Evaluation of Vitek 2 and Etest versus Broth Microdilution for Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Papadomanolaki, Arhodoula
    Siopi, Maria
    Karakosta, Polyxeni
    Vourli, Sophia
    Pournaras, Spyros
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (07):
  • [3] Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of Vitek 2 Meropenem-Vaborbactam for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Dwivedi, Hari P.
    Franklin, Simone
    Chandrasekaran, Sukantha
    Garner, Omai
    Traczewski, Maria M.
    Beasley, Denise
    Procop, Gary W.
    Tuohy, Marion
    Wilson, Deborah
    Bala, Yohann
    Pincus, David H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 60 (01)
  • [4] Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Nichols, Wright W.
    Stone, Gregory G.
    Newell, Paul
    Broadhurst, Helen
    Wardman, Angela
    MacPherson, Merran
    Yates, Katrina
    Riccobene, Todd
    Critchley, Ian A.
    Das, Shampa
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2018, 62 (11)
  • [5] A Selective Culture Medium for Screening Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Sadek, Mustafa
    Poirel, Laurent
    Tinguely, Camille
    Nordmann, Patrice
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (09)
  • [6] Performance of Ceftazidime-Avibactam 30/20-μg and 10/4-μg Disks for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Han, Renru
    Shen, Siquan
    Yin, Dandan
    Ding, Li
    Shi, Qingyu
    Yang, Yang
    Guo, Yan
    Wu, Shi
    Zhi, Peiyuan
    Zhu, Demei
    Hu, Fupin
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2023, 11 (02):
  • [7] Evaluation of the Etest and disk diffusion method for detection of the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China
    Wang, Qi
    Zhang, Feifei
    Wang, Zhanwei
    Chen, Hongbin
    Wang, Xiaojuan
    Zhang, Yawei
    Li, Shuguang
    Wang, Hui
    BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [8] Evaluation of the Etest and disk diffusion method for detection of the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China
    Qi Wang
    Feifei Zhang
    Zhanwei Wang
    Hongbin Chen
    Xiaojuan Wang
    Yawei Zhang
    Shuguang Li
    Hui Wang
    BMC Microbiology, 20
  • [9] Performance of disc diffusion, MIC gradient tests and Vitek 2 for ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Daragon, Brice
    Fournier, Damien
    Plesiat, Patrick
    Jeannot, Katy
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 76 (10) : 2586 - 2592
  • [10] Rapid ResaCeftazidime-Avibactam Enterobacterales NP Test: Rapid Detection of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility in Enterobacterales
    Feng, Luozhu
    Zhao, Yining
    Yao, Zhuocheng
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Zheng, Shufang
    Chen, Lijiang
    Zhang, Ying
    Wang, Lingbo
    Zhou, Tieli
    Cao, Jianming
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 60 (09)