Comparing methods of brand image measurement

被引:72
|
作者
Driesener, Carl [1 ]
Romaniuk, Jenni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Ehrenberg Bass Inst Marketing Sci, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1177/147078530604800605
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study compared rating, ranking and 'pick-any' measures of brand image associations. The pick-any technique is a free response measure, where respondents are given an attribute as a cue and asked which brands they associate with it. It is a free response in that respondents can link any, all or no brands with each attribute. It only captures the association, however, with no indication of relative strength. The study confirmed past findings that the three measures are highly correlated at brand level (average correlation of 0.90). Further analysis at individual level found that individuals utilised the three measures in a consistent manner, suggesting that the measures are virtually interchangeable. The main exception to this is when respondents rank brands; low ranks may simply be a reflection of unfamiliarity rather than poor performance on the attribute. When examining the time taken to administer each technique, however, there are clear benefits in a pick-any approach, which takes about half the time of the other methods to collect image data.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:681 / 698
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Country of origin, brand image perception, and brand image structure
    Koubaa, Yamen
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2008, 20 (02) : 139 - 155
  • [42] BUYERS BRAND PERCEPTION AND "BRAND IMAGE"
    Melisovna, Kazybayeva Aiman
    VITH RYSKULOV READINGS: SOCIO-ECONOMIC MODERNIZATION OF KAZAKHSTAN UNDER CONDITIONS OF GLOBAL FINANCIAL INSTABILITY, 2012, : 283 - 297
  • [43] Image Descriptors from ConvNets: Comparing Global Pooling Methods for Image Retrieval
    Comor, Ian
    Zhao, Yan
    Gao, Zhimin
    Zhou, Luping
    Wang, Lei
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL IMAGE COMPUTING: TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS (DICTA), 2016, : 743 - 750
  • [44] Comparing Measurement Error Between Two Different Methods of Measurement of Various Magnitudes
    Zavorsky, Gerald S.
    MEASUREMENT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2010, 14 (04) : 265 - 274
  • [45] Enhancing data collection methods with qualitative projective techniques in the exploration of a university's brand identity and brand image
    Spry, Louise
    Pich, Christopher
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2021, 63 (02) : 177 - 200
  • [46] The influence of brand communication, brand image, brand satisfaction, and brand trust on brand loyalty
    Putri, A. D. E.
    Indarini
    Anandya, D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MANAGEMENT (INSYMA 2019), 2019, 308 : 122 - 125
  • [47] Quality measurement of image segmentation evaluation methods
    Srubar, Stepan
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL IMAGE TECHNOLOGY & INTERNET BASED SYSTEMS (SITIS 2012), 2012, : 254 - 258
  • [48] Evaluation of differential methods for image velocity measurement
    Handschack, P
    COMPUTERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1996, 15 (01): : 81 - 104
  • [49] Brand Positioning Based on Brand Image-Country Image Fit
    Klein, Kristina
    Voelckner, Franziska
    Bruno, Hernan A.
    Sattler, Henrik
    Bruno, Pascal
    MARKETING SCIENCE, 2019, 38 (03) : 516 - 538
  • [50] Vegetation Measurement Using Image Processing Methods
    Kirci, Murvet
    Gunes, Ece Olcay
    Cakir, Yuksel
    Senturk, Selver
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS (AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS 2014), 2014, : 207 - 211