Comparing methods of brand image measurement

被引:72
|
作者
Driesener, Carl [1 ]
Romaniuk, Jenni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Ehrenberg Bass Inst Marketing Sci, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1177/147078530604800605
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study compared rating, ranking and 'pick-any' measures of brand image associations. The pick-any technique is a free response measure, where respondents are given an attribute as a cue and asked which brands they associate with it. It is a free response in that respondents can link any, all or no brands with each attribute. It only captures the association, however, with no indication of relative strength. The study confirmed past findings that the three measures are highly correlated at brand level (average correlation of 0.90). Further analysis at individual level found that individuals utilised the three measures in a consistent manner, suggesting that the measures are virtually interchangeable. The main exception to this is when respondents rank brands; low ranks may simply be a reflection of unfamiliarity rather than poor performance on the attribute. When examining the time taken to administer each technique, however, there are clear benefits in a pick-any approach, which takes about half the time of the other methods to collect image data.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 698
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Brand image
    Walker, J
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2000, 165 (2229) : 57 - 57
  • [32] Comparing clustering methods for database categorization in image retrieval
    Käster, T
    Wendt, V
    Sagerer, G
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2781 : 228 - 235
  • [33] Calibrating your brand image measurement technique by utilising empirical generalisations
    M K Winchester
    M Fletcher
    Journal of Brand Management, 2000, 8 (2) : 99 - 110
  • [34] Comparing Brand Placements and Advertisements on Brand Recall and Recognition
    Davtyan, Davit
    Stewart, Kristin
    Cunningham, Isabella
    JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH, 2016, 56 (03) : 299 - 310
  • [35] Assessing group efficacy - Comparing three methods of measurement
    Whiteoak, JW
    Chalip, L
    Hort, LK
    SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2004, 35 (02) : 158 - 173
  • [37] An Evaluation Procedure for Comparing Clock Jitter Measurement Methods
    Garay, Arturo Mollinedo
    Bernard, Florent
    Fischer, Viktor
    Haddad, Patrick
    Mureddu, Ugo
    SMART CARD RESEARCH AND ADVANCED APPLICATIONS, CARDIS 2022, 2023, 13820 : 167 - 187
  • [38] Comparing the Effectiveness of Current Methods of Polygenic Score Measurement
    Rammos, Alexandros
    Mitchell, Kevin J.
    Nicodemus, Kristin K.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 41 (07) : 649 - 650
  • [39] COMPARING 2 METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT - A PERSONAL HISTORY
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 24 : S7 - S14
  • [40] COMPARING THREE METHODS OF INTRAOPERATIVE TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT IN ADULTS
    Zulkapli, A.
    Tang, S. S. P.
    Lee, C. Y.
    Cheah, S. K.
    Manap, N. Abdul
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 : 775 - 776