A minimum sample size required from Schmidt hammer measurements

被引:76
|
作者
Niedzielski, Tomasz [1 ,2 ]
Migon, Piotr [1 ]
Placek, Agnieszka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wroclaw, Inst Geog & Reg Dev, Dept Geomorphol, PL-50137 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Space Res Ctr, PL-00716 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
Schmidt hammer; rock hardness; Sudetes Mountains; statistical analysis; sample size; LATE-LYING SNOWPATCHES; INTACT ROCK STRENGTH; SOUTHERN-NORWAY; AGE; HARDNESS; GEOMORPHOLOGY; LIMITATIONS; JOTUNHEIMEN; MOUNTAINS; MORAINES;
D O I
10.1002/esp.1851
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The Schmidt hammer is a useful tool applied by geomorphologists to measure rock strength in field conditions. The essence of field application is to obtain a sufficiently large dataset of individual rebound values, which yields a meaningful numerical value of mean strength. Although there is general agreement that a certain minimum sample size is required to proceed with the statistics, the choice of size (i.e. number of individual impacts) was usually intuitive and arbitrary. In this paper we show a simple statistical method, based on the two-sample Student's t-test, to objectively estimate the minimum number of rebound measurements. We present the results as (1) the 'mean' and 'median' solutions, each providing a single estimate value, and (2) the empirical probability distribution of such estimates based on many field samples. Schmidt hammer data for 14 lithologies, 13-81 samples for each, with each sample consisting of 40 individual readings, have been evaluated, assuming different significance levels. The principal recommendations are: (1) the recommended minimum sample size for weak and moderately strong rock is 25; (2) a sample size of 15 is sufficient for sandstones and shales; (3) strong and coarse rocks require 30 readings at a site; (4) the minimum sample size may be reduced by one-third if the context of research allows for higher significance level for test statistics. Interpretations based on less than 10 readings from a site should definitely be avoided. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1713 / 1725
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predicting EEG Sample Size Required for Classification Calibration
    Mao, Zijing
    Jung, Tzyy-Ping
    Lin, Chin-Teng
    Huang, Yufei
    FOUNDATIONS OF AUGMENTED COGNITION: NEUROERGONOMICS AND OPERATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, AC 2016, PT I, 2016, 9743 : 57 - 68
  • [42] Determining the sample size required for a community radon survey
    Chen, Jing
    Tracy, Bliss L.
    Zielinski, Jan M.
    Moir, Deborah
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2008, 94 (04): : 362 - 365
  • [43] THE REQUIRED SAMPLE-SIZE WHEN ESTIMATING VARIANCES
    THOMPSON, WA
    ENDRISS, J
    AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1961, 15 (03): : 22 - 23
  • [44] Minimum habitat size required to detect new rare species
    Chen, Youhua
    Shen, Tsung-Jen
    ECOLOGY, 2024, 105 (10)
  • [45] Bounds on quantum process fidelity from minimum required number of quantum state fidelity measurements
    Fiurasek, Jaromir
    Sedlak, Michal
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2014, 89 (01):
  • [46] MINSIZE: A computer program for obtaining minimum sample size as an indicator of effect size
    Morse, DT
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1998, 58 (01) : 142 - 153
  • [47] EFFECT OF SAMPLE SIZE ON FREEWAY NOISE MEASUREMENTS
    ONEALL, JS
    WALLACE, CE
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1973, 53 (01): : 305 - &
  • [48] Using the Schmidt hammer on folds: An example from the Cantabrian Zone (NW Iberian Peninsula)
    Poblet, J.
    Bulnes, M.
    Uzkeda, H.
    Magan, M.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY, 2022, 155
  • [49] Effect of grain size or anisotropy on the correlation between uniaxial compressive strength and Schmidt hammer test for building stones
    Kong, Fanmeng
    Xue, Yiguo
    Qiu, Daohong
    Gong, Huimin
    Ning, Zexu
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2021, 299
  • [50] An empirical study of the minimum required size and the minimum number of targets for pen input on the small display
    Mizobuchi, S
    Mori, K
    Ren, XS
    Michiaki, Y
    HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION WITH MOBILE DEVICES, 2002, 2411 : 184 - 194