A minimum sample size required from Schmidt hammer measurements

被引:76
|
作者
Niedzielski, Tomasz [1 ,2 ]
Migon, Piotr [1 ]
Placek, Agnieszka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wroclaw, Inst Geog & Reg Dev, Dept Geomorphol, PL-50137 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Space Res Ctr, PL-00716 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
Schmidt hammer; rock hardness; Sudetes Mountains; statistical analysis; sample size; LATE-LYING SNOWPATCHES; INTACT ROCK STRENGTH; SOUTHERN-NORWAY; AGE; HARDNESS; GEOMORPHOLOGY; LIMITATIONS; JOTUNHEIMEN; MOUNTAINS; MORAINES;
D O I
10.1002/esp.1851
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The Schmidt hammer is a useful tool applied by geomorphologists to measure rock strength in field conditions. The essence of field application is to obtain a sufficiently large dataset of individual rebound values, which yields a meaningful numerical value of mean strength. Although there is general agreement that a certain minimum sample size is required to proceed with the statistics, the choice of size (i.e. number of individual impacts) was usually intuitive and arbitrary. In this paper we show a simple statistical method, based on the two-sample Student's t-test, to objectively estimate the minimum number of rebound measurements. We present the results as (1) the 'mean' and 'median' solutions, each providing a single estimate value, and (2) the empirical probability distribution of such estimates based on many field samples. Schmidt hammer data for 14 lithologies, 13-81 samples for each, with each sample consisting of 40 individual readings, have been evaluated, assuming different significance levels. The principal recommendations are: (1) the recommended minimum sample size for weak and moderately strong rock is 25; (2) a sample size of 15 is sufficient for sandstones and shales; (3) strong and coarse rocks require 30 readings at a site; (4) the minimum sample size may be reduced by one-third if the context of research allows for higher significance level for test statistics. Interpretations based on less than 10 readings from a site should definitely be avoided. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1713 / 1725
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MINIMUM TARGET SIZE IN RADIATION FORCE MEASUREMENTS
    BEISSNER, K
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1984, 76 (05): : 1505 - 1510
  • [32] Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis
    Bujang, Mohamad Adam
    Adnan, Tassha Hilda
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (10) : YE1 - YE6
  • [33] Minimum Sample Size Requirements for Mokken Scale Analysis
    Straat, J. Hendrik
    van der Ark, L. Andries
    Sijtsma, Klaas
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2014, 74 (05) : 809 - 822
  • [34] Minimum Sample Size Recommendations for Conducting Factor Analyses
    Mundfrom, Daniel J.
    Shaw, Dale G.
    Ke, Tian Lu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING, 2005, 5 (02) : 159 - 168
  • [35] TABLES OF A SAMPLE MINIMUM SIZE NECESSARY FOR ESTIMATE OF A PROBABILITY
    OLIVIERI, D
    RIVISTA INTERNAZIONALE DI SCIENZE ECONOMICHE E COMMERCIALI, 1973, 20 (04): : 371 - 398
  • [36] Evaluation of different surface characteristics and mineral grain size in the estimation of rock strength using the Schmidt hammer
    Karaman, K.
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY, 2024, 124 (04) : 173 - 184
  • [37] Sample size in multistakeholder Delphi surveys: at what minimum sample size do replicability of results stabilize?
    Manyara, Anthony Muchai
    Purvis, Anthony
    Ciani, Oriana
    Collins, Gary S.
    Taylor, Rod S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 174
  • [38] Sample size required for predefined linkage decision quality
    Ginsburg, EK
    Axenovich, TI
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 14 (05) : 479 - 491
  • [39] Should proper estimation of sample size be required in RCT?
    Kumar, Ashok
    Soni, Shiv Lal
    Singh, Ajay
    Jain, Chirag
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 417
  • [40] Bayesian Update with Importance Sampling: Required Sample Size
    Sanz-Alonso, Daniel
    Wang, Zijian
    ENTROPY, 2021, 23 (01) : 1 - 21