Dosimetric comparison of ring and ovoid applicators

被引:0
|
作者
Tuncel, N. [2 ]
Toy, A. [3 ]
Demiral, A. N. [1 ]
Cetingoz, R. [1 ]
Garipagaoglu, M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, TR-35340 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Akdeniz Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, TR-07058 Antalya, Turkey
[3] Med Pk Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Antalya, Turkey
[4] Acibadem Hosp, Clin Radiat Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF BUON | 2009年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
applicator; dosimetry; intracavitary brachytherapy; DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY; VAGINAL CUFF IRRADIATION; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX; STAGE-IB; SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; RADIATION; PROTOCOL; THERAPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the dosimetry of different vaginal applicators used in the postoperative vaginal cuff irradiation. Materials and methods: In this model dosimetric study, standard ovoid applicator sets with 3 cap sizes (small/15 mm, medium/20 mm, and large/25 177177), and ring applicator sets with 3 diameter sizes (small/26 mm, medium/30 mm, large/34 mm) each with 3 different angles (30, 45, and 60 degrees) were used. Calculations were performed in Plato TPS (Treatment Planning System) as dwell positions of 2.5 mm step and equal dwell time for the sources. For ovoid applicators, the source positions 1-5 were loaded as active on each catheter, and in ring applicators the source positions 1-12, and 18-29; 1-14, and 19-32; 1-17, and 22-37 were loaded for small, medium and large ones, respectively In addition to ICRU rectum reference point (R-1), 4 different rectum reference points (RPs) (R-2-R-5) were defined 1 cm apart. The vaginal cuff RP (V-c) was defined at 5 mm depth from the vaginal surface. The reference volume dose distribution was obtained according to the V-c (100%) reference point. The width (w), max-min length (h, h), and max-min thickness (t, t') of the reference isodoses were measured and max-min reference volume (v, v') was calculated Results: R-1 dose was higher for ovoids (43.1%) than ring (28.6%), in all applicators. The increase of R-1 dose was parallel to the increase of ovoid/ring size (70-89%). As the applicator (ovoid-ring) size increased, max thickness of the reference isodose also increased (19-50%). For the largest size, the max increase was 62% (74.1-119.88 cm(3)) and 93% (59.15-114.24 cm(3)) for v and v', respectively. However, the magnitude of the reference volume was independent of the ring angle. Conclusion: In the present study it was found that when ring applicators were used according to recommended dwell positions, max rectum reference dose decreased in comparison to ovoid applicators; on the other hand, it should be noted that the size of the reference volume also decreased significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 455
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric Comparison Between Split Ring and Tandem & Ovoid HDR Brachytherapy Applicators in Cervical Cancer Treatment
    Ishaq, O.
    Montgomery, J. R.
    Duckworth, T.
    Hsu, H.
    Schiff, P. B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S857 - S857
  • [2] Dosimetric evaluation of image based brachytherapy using tandem ovoid and tandem ring applicators
    Rangarajan, Ramya
    [J]. REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2018, 23 (01) : 57 - 60
  • [3] Dosimetric evaluation of image guided brachytherapy using tandem- ovoid and tandem- ring applicators
    Rangarajan, R.
    Saravanan, S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S930 - S931
  • [4] Comparison of Dosimetry and Late Toxicity Between Split Ring and Tandem and Ovoid HDR Brachytherapy Applicators in Cervical Cancer
    Ishaq, O.
    Talcott, W.
    Duckworth, T.
    Lymberis, S.
    Schiff, P. B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E288 - E288
  • [5] Intrapatient Dosimetric Variability Between Two Adjustable Brachytherapy Applicators for Cervical Cancer: Tandem/Ovoid vs. Tandem/Split-Ring
    Shah, B. A.
    Duckworth, T.
    Jennings, G. T.
    Ishaq, O., Jr.
    Schiff, P. B.
    Lymberis, S. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E635 - E636
  • [6] Adjuvant Brachytherapy for Early Stage Endometrial Cancer: Clinical Outcomes and Dosimetric Comparisons of Ovoid and Cylinder Applicators
    Barlas, Ceren
    Ergen, Sefika Arzu
    Karacam, Songul cavdar
    Sahinler, Ismet
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 22 (03)
  • [7] Dosimetric Comparison of Tandem and Ovoid (TO) Vs. Tandem and Ring (TR) Applicators in High-Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy (BT) for the Treatment of Locally-Advanced Cervical-Cancer
    Kuo, L.
    Viswanathan, A.
    Damato, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3404 - 3404
  • [8] Dosimetric Comparison of LDR Vs. HDR Tandem Ovoid Brachytherapy
    Li, W.
    Liu, L.
    Tanny, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [9] Short-term clinical outcome and dosimetric comparison of tandem and ring versus tandem and ovoids intracavitary applicators
    Ma, John K.
    Mourad, Waleed F.
    Allbright, Robert
    Packianathan, Satyaseelan
    Harrell, Leslie M.
    Chinchar, Edmund
    Nguyen, Alex
    Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 7 (03) : 218 - 223
  • [10] Dosimetric and toxicity comparison between Syed-Neblett and Fletcher-Suit-Delclos Tandem and Ovoid applicators in high dose rate cervix cancer brachytherapy
    Portocarrero-Bonifaz, Andres
    Syed, Salman
    Kassel, Maxwell
    Mckenzie, Grant W.
    Shah, Vishwa M.
    Forry, Bryce M.
    Gaskins, Jeremy T.
    Sowards, Keith T.
    Avula, Thulasi Babitha
    Masters, Adrianna
    Silva, Scott R.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2024, 23 (04) : 397 - 406