Dosimetric evaluation of image based brachytherapy using tandem ovoid and tandem ring applicators

被引:8
|
作者
Rangarajan, Ramya [1 ]
机构
[1] Govt Royapettah Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Intracavitary brachytherapy; Tandem-ovoid; Tandem-ring;
D O I
10.1016/j.rpor.2017.12.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate the differences in dosimetry between tandem-ovoid and tandem-ring gynaecologic brachytherapy applicators in image based brachytherapy. Background: Traditionally, tandem ovoid applicators were used to deliver dose to tumor in intracavitary brachytherapy. Tandem-ring, tandem-cylinder and hybrid intracavitary, interstitial applicators are also used nowadays in cervical cancer brachytherapy. Methods and materials: 100 CT datasets of cervical cancer patients (stage IB2 - IIIB) receiving HDR application (50 tandem-ovoid and 50 tandem-ring) were studied. Brachytherapy was delivered using a CT-MRI compatible tandem-ovoid (50 patients) and a tandem-ring applicator (50 patients). DVHs were calculated and D2cc was recorded for the bladder and rectum and compared with the corresponding ICRU point doses. The point B dose, the treated volume, high dose volume and the treatment time were recorded and compared for the two applicators. Results: The mean D2cc of the bladder with TR applicator was 6.746 Gy. TO applicator delivered a mean D2cc of 7.160 Gy to the bladder. The mean ICRU bladder points were 5.60 and 5.63 Gy for TR and TO applicator, respectively. The mean D2cc of the rectum was 4.04 Gy and 4.79 Gy for TR and TO applicators, respectively. The corresponding ICRU point doses were 5.10 Gy and 5.66 Gy, respectively. Conclusions: The results indicate that the OAR doses assessed by DVH criteria were higher than ICRU point doses for the bladder with both tandem-ovoid and tandem-ring applicators whereas DVH based dose was lower than ICRU dose for the rectum. The point B dose, the treated volume and high dose volume was found to be slightly higher with the tandem ovoid applicator. The mean D2cc dose for the bladder and rectum was lower with tandem ring applicators. The clinical implication of the above dosimetric differences needs to be evaluated further. (C) 2018 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 60
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric evaluation of image guided brachytherapy using tandem- ovoid and tandem- ring applicators
    Rangarajan, R.
    Saravanan, S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S930 - S931
  • [2] Dosimetric Comparison Between Split Ring and Tandem & Ovoid HDR Brachytherapy Applicators in Cervical Cancer Treatment
    Ishaq, O.
    Montgomery, J. R.
    Duckworth, T.
    Hsu, H.
    Schiff, P. B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S857 - S857
  • [3] Intrapatient Dosimetric Variability Between Two Adjustable Brachytherapy Applicators for Cervical Cancer: Tandem/Ovoid vs. Tandem/Split-Ring
    Shah, B. A.
    Duckworth, T.
    Jennings, G. T.
    Ishaq, O., Jr.
    Schiff, P. B.
    Lymberis, S. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E635 - E636
  • [4] Automatic contouring using deformable image registration for tandem-ring or tandem-ovoid brachytherapy
    Yedekci, Yagiz
    Gultekin, Melis
    Sari, Sezin Yuce
    Yildiz, Ferah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2022, 14 (01) : 72 - 79
  • [5] Automatic Contouring Using Deformable Image Registration for Tandem-Ring or Tandem-Ovoid Brachytherapy
    Yedekci, F. Y.
    Gultekin, M.
    Sari, S. Yuce
    Yildiz, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E127 - E127
  • [6] Spatial and Dosimetric Comparison of Tandem/Ring Applicator Against Adjustable Tandem/Ovoid and Tandem/Split-Ring for Intracavitary Brachytherapy Treatment of Cervical Cancer
    Talcott, W. J.
    Duckworth, T.
    Wu, S. P. P.
    Ishaq, O.
    Walton, R. M.
    Osterman, K. S.
    Schiff, P. B.
    Lymberis, S. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E312 - E312
  • [7] Automated Dose Point Placement for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy Using Tandem and Ovoid Applicators
    Kang, H.
    Padilla, L.
    Hasan, Y.
    Al-Hallaq, H.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3364 - 3364
  • [8] Dosimetric comparison of ring and ovoid applicators
    Tuncel, N.
    Toy, A.
    Demiral, A. N.
    Cetingoz, R.
    Garipagaoglu, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUON, 2009, 14 (03): : 451 - 455
  • [9] Vaginal Dose Is Associated With Toxicity in Image Guided Tandem Ring or Ovoid-Based Brachytherapy
    Susko, Matthew
    Craciunescu, Oana
    Meltsner, Sheridan
    Yang, Yun
    Steffey, Beverly
    Cai, Jing
    Chino, Junzo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 94 (05): : 1099 - 1105
  • [10] Evaluation of the Dosimetric Quality of MRI-Only HDR Brachytherapy Planning with Titanium Ring-And-Tandem Applicators
    Veltchev, I.
    Lin, T.
    Chen, X.
    Price, R.
    Howell, K.
    Ma, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E818 - E818