Live birth sex ratios are not influenced by blastocyst-stage embryo transfer

被引:29
|
作者
Csokmay, John M. [3 ]
Hill, Micah J. [2 ]
Cioppettini, Frank V. [1 ]
Miller, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Scott, Richard T., Jr. [1 ]
Frattarelli, John L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Reprod Med Associates New Jersey, Morristown, NJ 07960 USA
[2] Blanchfield Army Community Hosp, Ft Campbell, KY USA
[3] NICHHD, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
Sex ratio; gender ratio; sex selection; blastocyst; PGS; IVF outcomes; pregnancy; live birth; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; SELECTION; INVITRO; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1741
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the sex ratio of infants born after blastocyst-stage transfer of embryos with normal preimplantation FISH genetic screening. Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Setting: Large academic assisted reproductive technology center. Patient(s): Two hundred twenty-eight patients undergoing fresh IVF cycle with blastocyst transfer. Intervention(s): Preimplantation genetic screening for sex complement. Main Outcome Measure(s): Sex ratio in liveborn infants following blastocyst transfer. Result(s): One thousand thirteen embryos were normal by preimplantation genetic screening of chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 17, 18,21, 22, X, and Y. Four hundred ninety-eight normal embryos were transferred to 228 patients with an overall live birth rate of 41.7%. Transferred blastocysts were selected based upon morphologic assessment. When controlling for the sex of the blastocyst embryo, there was no difference in the male-to-female delivery rate per embryo transferred (27.3% vs. 21.4%) (relative risk=1.28, confidence interval 0.93-1.74). Of the live births 51.7% were male and 48.3% were female (P=.61). Subanalysis revealed no difference in male-to-female delivery rates in groups with a 1:1 ratio of male:female embryos transferred, a non 1:1 ratio transferred, or single-sex transfers. Conclusion(s): Blastocyst-stage embryo transfer does not influence the live birth sex ratio of embryos with normal preimplantation FISH genetic screening. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;92:913-7. (C)2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 917
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Blastocyst quality affects the success of blastocyst-stage embryo transfer
    Balaban, B
    Urman, B
    Sertac, A
    Alatas, C
    Aksoy, S
    Mercan, R
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (02) : 282 - 287
  • [2] Live Birth after Cleavage-Stage versus Blastocyst-Stage Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Randomised Controlled Study
    Mahmoudinia, Maliheh
    Souizi, Behnaz
    Ebadi, Seyed Mohammad Reza
    Zakerinasab, Faezeh
    Sadeghi, Tahereh
    Mahmoudinia, Mahbobeh
    Hamdieh, Mostafa
    Hassani, Fatemeh
    Hosseini, Roya
    Kalantar, Seyed Mehdi
    Khazaei, Mozafar
    Kheradmand, Alireza
    Movaghar, Afarin Rahimi
    Moazzeni, Seyed Mohammad
    Pooransari, Parichehr
    Ramazanali, Fariba
    Shahhoseini, Maryam
    Tavalaee, Marziyeh
    Ashrafi, Mahnaz
    Alhalabi, Marwan
    Barra, Fabio
    Berga, Sarah L.
    Calagna, Gloria
    Franciscis, Pasquale De
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Madani, Tahereh
    Moini, Ashraf
    Nezhat, Camran
    Niroomanesh, Shirin
    Nouri, Kazem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2024, 18
  • [3] Blastocyst transfer for all? Higher cumulative live birth chance in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy
    Di Croo, I
    Colman, R.
    De Sutter, P.
    Tilleman, K.
    [J]. FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2019, 11 (02): : 169 - 176
  • [4] Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle
    De Vos, Anick
    Van Landuyt, Lisbet
    Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
    Camus, Michel
    Van de Velde, Hilde
    Tournaye, Herman
    Verheyen, Greta
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (11) : 2442 - 2449
  • [5] Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Quinteiro Retamar, Andrea Marta
    Alvarez Sedo, Cristian Roberto
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Cornelisse, Simone
    Blake, Deborah
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (05):
  • [6] Leukocyte telomere length in children born following blastocyst-stage embryo transfer
    Cheng Wang
    Yayun Gu
    Jun Zhou
    Jie Zang
    Xiufeng Ling
    Hong Li
    Lingmin Hu
    Bei Xu
    Bo Zhang
    Na Qin
    Hong Lv
    Weiwei Duan
    Yue Jiang
    Yuanlin He
    Tao Jiang
    Congcong Chen
    Xiumei Han
    Kun Zhou
    Bo Xu
    Xiaoyu Liu
    Shiyao Tao
    Yangqian Jiang
    Jiangbo Du
    Juncheng Dai
    Feiyang Diao
    Chuncheng Lu
    Xuejiang Guo
    Ran Huo
    Jiayin Liu
    Yuan Lin
    Yankai Xia
    Guangfu Jin
    Hongxia Ma
    Hongbing Shen
    Zhibin Hu
    [J]. Nature Medicine, 2022, 28 : 2646 - 2653
  • [7] A prospective randomized study comparing day 3 with blastocyst-stage embryo transfer
    Levron, J
    Shulman, A
    Bider, D
    Seidman, D
    Levin, T
    Dor, J
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (06) : 1300 - 1301
  • [8] Leukocyte telomere length in children born following blastocyst-stage embryo transfer
    Wang, Cheng
    Gu, Yayun
    Zhou, Jun
    Zang, Jie
    Ling, Xiufeng
    Li, Hong
    Hu, Lingmin
    Xu, Bei
    Zhang, Bo
    Qin, Na
    Lv, Hong
    Duan, Weiwei
    Jiang, Yue
    He, Yuanlin
    Jiang, Tao
    Chen, Congcong
    Han, Xiumei
    Zhou, Kun
    Xu, Bo
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Tao, Shiyao
    Jiang, Yangqian
    Du, Jiangbo
    Dai, Juncheng
    Diao, Feiyang
    Lu, Chuncheng
    Guo, Xuejiang
    Huo, Ran
    Liu, Jiayin
    Lin, Yuan
    Xia, Yankai
    Jin, Guangfu
    Ma, Hongxia
    Shen, Hongbing
    Hu, Zhibin
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2022, 28 (12) : 2646 - +
  • [9] Cumulative live birth rates after fresh cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage transfer in combination with vitrification on day 5
    De Croo, I.
    Tilleman, K.
    Vandekerckhove, F.
    Vanden Abbeel, E.
    De Sutter, P.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 125 - 125
  • [10] A history of failed blastocyst-stage embryo transfer does not diminish the beneficial effect of blastocyst transfer in a subsequent cycle.
    Miller, KA
    Elkind-Hirsch, KE
    Bergh, PA
    Scott, RT
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 : S159 - S159