Blastocyst transfer for all? Higher cumulative live birth chance in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy

被引:0
|
作者
Di Croo, I [1 ]
Colman, R. [2 ]
De Sutter, P. [1 ]
Tilleman, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ghent, Reprod Med, C Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Biostat Unit, C Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
来源
FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN | 2019年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
Cleavage-stage transfer; blastocyst-stage transfer; cumulative live birth rate; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; DELIVERY RATE; FRESH; PREGNANCIES; OUTCOMES; CULTURE; IMPACT; AGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: In an unselected patient population, what is the cumulative live birth rate per oocyte collection cycle in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy? Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of 1656 IVF and ICSI cycles was performed in two time-frames between January 2010 and December 2016. Transfer was scheduled, either on day 3 (n=729) or on day 5 (n=927). In this study, the main outcome measure was cumulative live birth rate per oocyte collection cycle including fresh and frozen embryo transfers in both groups. Results: The cumulative live birth rates per oocyte collection cycle were comparable between patients with cleavage-stage transfers (day 3 group) and those with blastocyst-stage transfers (day 5 group) (23.7% versus 25.5%, respectively; p = 0.42). After controlling for confounders, there was a 34% increased chance of live birth with blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared with cleavage-stage transfer policy (odds ratio (OR) =1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.051 to 1.704; p = 0.018). Conclusion: In an unselected patient cohort, the cumulative live birth chance per oocyte collection cycle is higher in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 176
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A stepwise approach to move from a cleavage-stage to a blastocyst-stage transfer policy for all patients in the IVF clinic
    De Croo, I
    De Sutter, P.
    Tilleman, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2020, 2020 (03)
  • [2] Cumulative live birth rates after fresh cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage transfer in combination with vitrification on day 5
    De Croo, I.
    Tilleman, K.
    Vandekerckhove, F.
    Vanden Abbeel, E.
    De Sutter, P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 125 - 125
  • [3] Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle
    De Vos, Anick
    Van Landuyt, Lisbet
    Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
    Camus, Michel
    Van de Velde, Hilde
    Tournaye, Herman
    Verheyen, Greta
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (11) : 2442 - 2449
  • [4] Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer
    Milki, AA
    Jun, SH
    Hinckley, MD
    Behr, B
    Giudice, LC
    Westphal, LM
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (03) : 503 - 506
  • [5] Blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer?
    Johnson, Neil
    Blake, Debbie
    Farquhar, Cindy
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [6] Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Quinteiro Retamar, Andrea Marta
    Alvarez Sedo, Cristian Roberto
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Cornelisse, Simone
    Blake, Deborah
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (05):
  • [7] Cumulative live birth rate in freeze-all cycles is comparable to that of a conventional embryo transfer policy at the cleavage stage but superior at the blastocyst stage
    Zaca, Carlotta
    Bazzoccbi, Antonia
    Pennetta, Francesca
    Bonu, Maria Antonietta
    Coticchio, Giovanni
    Borini, Andrea
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : 703 - 709
  • [8] Blastocyst-stage transfer of poor-quality cleavage-stage embryos results in higher implantation rates
    Balaban, B
    Urman, B
    Alatas, C
    Mercan, R
    Aksoy, S
    Isiklar, A
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 75 (03) : 514 - 518
  • [9] Live Birth after Cleavage-Stage versus Blastocyst-Stage Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Randomised Controlled Study
    Mahmoudinia, Maliheh
    Souizi, Behnaz
    Ebadi, Seyed Mohammad Reza
    Zakerinasab, Faezeh
    Sadeghi, Tahereh
    Mahmoudinia, Mahbobeh
    Hamdieh, Mostafa
    Hassani, Fatemeh
    Hosseini, Roya
    Kalantar, Seyed Mehdi
    Khazaei, Mozafar
    Kheradmand, Alireza
    Movaghar, Afarin Rahimi
    Moazzeni, Seyed Mohammad
    Pooransari, Parichehr
    Ramazanali, Fariba
    Shahhoseini, Maryam
    Tavalaee, Marziyeh
    Ashrafi, Mahnaz
    Alhalabi, Marwan
    Barra, Fabio
    Berga, Sarah L.
    Calagna, Gloria
    Franciscis, Pasquale De
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Madani, Tahereh
    Moini, Ashraf
    Nezhat, Camran
    Niroomanesh, Shirin
    Nouri, Kazem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2024, 18
  • [10] Cumulative Pregnancy Rates Following Cleavage-stage and Blastocyst Embryo Transfer
    Kwik, Michele
    Lam, Lawrence
    Chapman, Michael
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 50 : 5 - 5