Cumulative live birth rates after fresh cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage transfer in combination with vitrification on day 5

被引：0
|
作者：
De Croo, I. [1 ]
Tilleman, K. [1 ]
Vandekerckhove, F. [1 ]
Vanden Abbeel, E. [1 ]
De Sutter, P. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Ctr Reprod Med, Ghent, Belgium
来源：
HUMAN REPRODUCTION | 2017年 / 32卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
O-273
引用
下载
收藏
页码：125 / 125
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle
    De Vos, Anick
    Van Landuyt, Lisbet
    Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
    Camus, Michel
    Van de Velde, Hilde
    Tournaye, Herman
    Verheyen, Greta
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (11) : 2442 - 2449
  • [2] Blastocyst transfer for all? Higher cumulative live birth chance in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy
    Di Croo, I
    Colman, R.
    De Sutter, P.
    Tilleman, K.
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2019, 11 (02): : 169 - 176
  • [3] Cumulative pregnancy rates after single cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: a randomized and prospective study
    Brugnon, F.
    Bouraoui, Z.
    Ouchchane, L.
    Gremeau, A. S.
    Peikrishvili, R.
    Pouly, J. L.
    Janny, L.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 : I60 - I61
  • [4] Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results
    S. Fernández-Shaw
    R. Cercas
    C. Braña
    C. Villas
    I. Pons
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2015, 32 : 177 - 184
  • [5] Live Birth after Cleavage-Stage versus Blastocyst-Stage Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Randomised Controlled Study
    Mahmoudinia, Maliheh
    Souizi, Behnaz
    Ebadi, Seyed Mohammad Reza
    Zakerinasab, Faezeh
    Sadeghi, Tahereh
    Mahmoudinia, Mahbobeh
    Hamdieh, Mostafa
    Hassani, Fatemeh
    Hosseini, Roya
    Kalantar, Seyed Mehdi
    Khazaei, Mozafar
    Kheradmand, Alireza
    Movaghar, Afarin Rahimi
    Moazzeni, Seyed Mohammad
    Pooransari, Parichehr
    Ramazanali, Fariba
    Shahhoseini, Maryam
    Tavalaee, Marziyeh
    Ashrafi, Mahnaz
    Alhalabi, Marwan
    Barra, Fabio
    Berga, Sarah L.
    Calagna, Gloria
    Franciscis, Pasquale De
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Madani, Tahereh
    Moini, Ashraf
    Nezhat, Camran
    Niroomanesh, Shirin
    Nouri, Kazem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2024, 18
  • [6] Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results
    Fernandez-Shaw, S.
    Cercas, R.
    Brana, C.
    Villas, C.
    Pons, I.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2015, 32 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [7] Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Quinteiro Retamar, Andrea Marta
    Alvarez Sedo, Cristian Roberto
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Cornelisse, Simone
    Blake, Deborah
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (05):
  • [8] Cumulative Pregnancy Rates Following Cleavage-stage and Blastocyst Embryo Transfer
    Kwik, Michele
    Lam, Lawrence
    Chapman, Michael
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 50 : 5 - 5
  • [9] Blastocyst-stage transfer of poor-quality cleavage-stage embryos results in higher implantation rates
    Balaban, B
    Urman, B
    Alatas, C
    Mercan, R
    Aksoy, S
    Isiklar, A
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 75 (03) : 514 - 518
  • [10] In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos.
    Papanikolaou, EG
    Camus, M
    Kolibianakis, EM
    Van Landuyt, L
    Van Steirteghem, A
    Devroey, P
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (11): : 1139 - 1146
12345