Cumulative live birth rates after fresh cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage transfer in combination with vitrification on day 5

被引：0
|
作者：
De Croo, I. [1 ]
Tilleman, K. [1 ]
Vandekerckhove, F. [1 ]
Vanden Abbeel, E. [1 ]
De Sutter, P. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Ctr Reprod Med, Ghent, Belgium
来源：
HUMAN REPRODUCTION | 2017年 / 32卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
O-273
引用
下载
收藏
页码：125 / 125
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BLASTOCYST VERSUS CLEAVAGE-STAGE ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER - A COMPARATIVE RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Veleva, Z.
    Boulet, S.
    Makinen, S.
    Martikainen, H.
    Tiitinen, A.
    Tapanainen, J.
    Kissin, D. M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E181 - E182
  • [42] Live birth rates in day 5 fresh versus vitrified single blastocyst transfer cycles: A cross- sectional analysis
    Kieu, Violet
    Polyakov, Alex
    Rozen, Genia
    Lantsberg, Daniel
    Stern, Catharyn
    Teh, Wan Tinn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2023, 21 (03) : 245 - 254
  • [43] Effects of high three pro-nuclei (3PN) proportion incidence on clinical outcomes in the fresh cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryo transfer (ET) cycles
    Li, Mingzhao
    Xue, Xia
    Zhao, Wanqiu
    Li, Wei
    Shi, Juanzi
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 33 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [44] Non-inferiority of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in poor prognosis IVF patients (PRECiSE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Werner M. Neuhausser
    Denis A. Vaughan
    Denny Sakkas
    Michele R. Hacker
    Tom Toth
    Alan Penzias
    Reproductive Health, 17
  • [45] Non-inferiority of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in poor prognosis IVF patients (PRECiSE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Neuhausser, Werner M.
    Vaughan, Denis A.
    Sakkas, Denny
    Hacker, Michele R.
    Toth, Tom
    Penzias, Alan
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [46] Cumulative live birth rate in freeze-all cycles is comparable to that of a conventional embryo transfer policy at the cleavage stage but superior at the blastocyst stage
    Zaca, Carlotta
    Bazzoccbi, Antonia
    Pennetta, Francesca
    Bonu, Maria Antonietta
    Coticchio, Giovanni
    Borini, Andrea
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : 703 - 709
  • [47] Live birth rates after different endometrial preparation methods in frozen cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial
    Tahereh Madani
    Fariba Ramezanali
    Azar Yahyaei
    Fatemeh Hasani
    Narges Bagheri Lankarani
    Ladan Mohammadi Yeganeh
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019, 299 : 1185 - 1191
  • [48] Cleavage stage embryo transfer impairs cumulative live birth rates and time to livebirth as compared to blastocyst transfer in oocyte recipients. A randomized controlled trial
    Clua Obrado, E.
    Rodriguez, I.
    Arroyo, G.
    Martinez, F.
    Latre, L.
    Coroleu, B.
    Polyzos, N. P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 2 - 3
  • [49] Cryoloop vitrification of human day 3 cleavage-stage embryos: post-vitrification development, pregnancy outcomes and live births
    Desai, Nina
    Blackmon, Heather
    Szeptycki, Julia
    Goldfarb, James
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2007, 14 (02) : 208 - 213
  • [50] Live birth rates after different endometrial preparation methods in frozen cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial
    Madani, Tahereh
    Ramezanali, Fariba
    Yahyaei, Azar
    Hasani, Fatemeh
    Lankarani, Narges Bagheri
    Yeganeh, Ladan Mohammadi
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 299 (04) : 1185 - 1191
12345