Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics A randomized crossover manikin trial

被引:16
|
作者
Gawlowski, Pawel [1 ]
Smereka, Jacek [1 ]
Madziala, Marcin [2 ]
Cohen, Barak [3 ]
Ruetzler, Kurt [3 ]
Szarpak, Lukasz [2 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Emergency Med Serv, Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Emergency Med, 4 Lindleya Str, PL-02005 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Cleveland Clin, Inst Anesthesiol, Dept Gen Anesthesiol & Outcomes Res, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
airway management; cervical spine stabilization; vivaSight SL; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; TUBE; GLIDESCOPE(R); PATIENT; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000005873
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Management of the airway of a trauma victim is considered challenging. Various approaches have been described to achieve airway control in this setup; many of them include video-assited viewing of the larynx during intubation. ETView Single Lumen (SL) is a novice single-use endotracheal tube equiped with a video camera and a light source at its distal tip. Its use was previously described in seeral clinical and training setups. Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the VivaSight SL compared with classic direct laryngoscopy performed with a Macintosh blade in a manikin-simulated trauma setup presenting various degrees of airway challenge when performed by inexperienced physicians. Design, Setting, Participants: This was prospective, randomized, crossover, manikin trial. After short training on the ETView system, 67 novice paramedics attempted to perform oral intubation using both standard direct laryngoscopy (MAC group) and the VivaSight SL endotracheal tube (ETView group) in a randomized order on manikins in 3 increasingly more difficult scenarios (simple intubation, cervical spine manual stabilization, and with cervical collar in place). Outcome Measure: Overall success rate, time to intubation, number of intubation attempts, laryngeal view grade, dental compression, and overall participant satisfaction were monitored. Results: Duration of intubation and number of attempts were significantly superior in the ETView group in the latter 2 more challenging scenarios. All other parameters showed superiority to the ETView group in all 3 scenarios. Conclusion: The VivaSight SL system performed better in a complex scenario of airway management of a trauma victim in need for cervical spine stabilization performed by novice caregivers compared to standard direct laryngoscopy and should be considered in this clinical setup.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the VivaSight single lumen endotracheal tube and the Macintosh laryngoscope for emergency intubation by experienced paramedics in a standardized airway manikin with restricted access: a randomized, crossover trial
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Smereka, Jacek
    Kurowski, Andrzej
    Evrin, Togay
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (05): : 929 - 930
  • [2] Comparison of ETView SL, Airtraq, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for face-to-face tracheal intubation: a randomized crossover manikin trial
    Madziala, Agnieszka
    Majer, Jolanta
    Madziala, Marcin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (09): : 1893 - 1894
  • [3] Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial
    Wetsch, Wolfgang A.
    Spelten, Oliver
    Hellmich, Martin
    Carlitscheck, Martin
    Padosch, Stephan A.
    Lier, Heiko
    Boettiger, Bernd W.
    Hinkelbein, Jochen
    RESUSCITATION, 2012, 83 (06) : 740 - 745
  • [4] Comparison of intubation performance between the King Vision and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice personnel: a randomized, crossover manikin study
    Yuki Akihisa
    Koichi Maruyama
    Yukihide Koyama
    Rieko Yamada
    Akira Ogura
    Tomio Andoh
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2014, 28 : 51 - 57
  • [5] Comparison of intubation performance between the King Vision and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice personnel: a randomized, crossover manikin study
    Akihisa, Yuki
    Maruyama, Koichi
    Koyama, Yukihide
    Yamada, Rieko
    Ogura, Akira
    Andoh, Tomio
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2014, 28 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [6] A comparison of the McGrath-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for child tracheal intubation during resuscitation by paramedics. A randomized, crossover, manikin study
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    Gaszynski, Tomasz
    Rodriguez-Nunez, Antonio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (08): : 1338 - 1341
  • [7] Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial
    Yi, In Kyong
    Kwak, Hyun Jeong
    Lee, Kyung Cheon
    Lee, Ji Hyea
    Min, Sang Kee
    Kim, Jong Yeop
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 25 (01)
  • [8] Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial
    In Kyong Yi
    Hyun Jeong Kwak
    Kyung Cheon Lee
    Ji Hyea Lee
    Sang Kee Min
    Jong Yeop Kim
    European Journal of Medical Research, 25
  • [9] A randomized crossover trial comparing the C-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for face-to-face intubation in a manikin
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Galazkowski, Robert
    Evrin, Togay
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (05): : 920 - 922
  • [10] Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via the iGEL for Intubation With C-spine immobilization: A Randomized, crossover, manikin trial
    Gawlowski, Pawel
    Smereka, Jacek
    Madziala, Marcin
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Frass, Michael
    Robak, Oliver
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (03): : 484 - 487