Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics A randomized crossover manikin trial

被引:16
|
作者
Gawlowski, Pawel [1 ]
Smereka, Jacek [1 ]
Madziala, Marcin [2 ]
Cohen, Barak [3 ]
Ruetzler, Kurt [3 ]
Szarpak, Lukasz [2 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Emergency Med Serv, Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Emergency Med, 4 Lindleya Str, PL-02005 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Cleveland Clin, Inst Anesthesiol, Dept Gen Anesthesiol & Outcomes Res, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
airway management; cervical spine stabilization; vivaSight SL; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; TUBE; GLIDESCOPE(R); PATIENT; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000005873
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Management of the airway of a trauma victim is considered challenging. Various approaches have been described to achieve airway control in this setup; many of them include video-assited viewing of the larynx during intubation. ETView Single Lumen (SL) is a novice single-use endotracheal tube equiped with a video camera and a light source at its distal tip. Its use was previously described in seeral clinical and training setups. Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the VivaSight SL compared with classic direct laryngoscopy performed with a Macintosh blade in a manikin-simulated trauma setup presenting various degrees of airway challenge when performed by inexperienced physicians. Design, Setting, Participants: This was prospective, randomized, crossover, manikin trial. After short training on the ETView system, 67 novice paramedics attempted to perform oral intubation using both standard direct laryngoscopy (MAC group) and the VivaSight SL endotracheal tube (ETView group) in a randomized order on manikins in 3 increasingly more difficult scenarios (simple intubation, cervical spine manual stabilization, and with cervical collar in place). Outcome Measure: Overall success rate, time to intubation, number of intubation attempts, laryngeal view grade, dental compression, and overall participant satisfaction were monitored. Results: Duration of intubation and number of attempts were significantly superior in the ETView group in the latter 2 more challenging scenarios. All other parameters showed superiority to the ETView group in all 3 scenarios. Conclusion: The VivaSight SL system performed better in a complex scenario of airway management of a trauma victim in need for cervical spine stabilization performed by novice caregivers compared to standard direct laryngoscopy and should be considered in this clinical setup.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endotracheal intubation of COVID-19 patients by paramedics using a box barrier: A randomized crossover manikin study
    Feldman, Oren
    Samuel, Nir
    Kvatinsky, Noa
    Idelman, Ravit
    Diamand, Raz
    Shavit, Itai
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [22] Randomized controlled trial of the AP Advance, McGrath, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and difficult intubation scenarios: a manikin study
    Burdett, E.
    Ross-Anderson, D. J.
    Makepeace, J.
    Bassett, P. A.
    Clarke, S. G.
    Mitchell, V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 107 (06) : 983 - 988
  • [23] Are paramedics able to perform endotracheal intubation with access to the patient through the back seat of the car? Randomized crossover manikin study
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Smereka, Jacek
    Evrin, Togay
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (06): : 1161 - 1163
  • [24] Tracheal intubation in a simulated cervical spine immobilisation: The Macintosh laryngoscope versus supraglottic airway devices - A manikin study
    Aleksandrowicz, Dawid
    Gaszynski, Tomasz
    TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 21 : 53 - 56
  • [25] Comparison of intubation times using a manikin with an immobilized cervical spine: Macintosh laryngoscope vs. GlideScope vs. fiberoptic bronchoscope
    Ko, Jung-In
    Ha, Sang Ook
    Koo, Min Seok
    Kwon, Miyoung
    Kim, Jieun
    Jeon, Jin
    Park, So Hee
    Shim, Sangwoo
    Chang, Youjin
    Park, Taejin
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 2 (04): : 244 - 249
  • [26] Comparison of the GlideScope® with the Macintosh laryngoscope in endotracheal intubation during uninterrupted mechanical chest compression: a randomised crossover manikin study
    Yeung, F. S. H.
    Lam, R. P. K.
    Wong, T. W.
    Chan, L. W.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (03) : 159 - 167
  • [27] A randomised crossover trial comparing the Airtraq® NT, McGrath® MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation of simulated easy and difficult airways in a manikin
    Angel Gomez-Rios, Manuel
    Pinegger, Stephan
    de Carrillo Mantilla, Maria
    Vizcaino, Lucia
    Barreto-Calvo, Purisima
    Paech, Michael J.
    Gomez-Rios, David
    Lopez-Calvino, Beatriz
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2016, 66 (03): : 289 - 297
  • [28] Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial
    Łukasz Szarpak
    Łukasz Czyżewski
    Andrzej Kurowski
    Zenon Truszewski
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2015, 174 : 1325 - 1332
  • [29] Comparison of three supraglottic airway devices for blind tracheal intubation by novice practitioners: A randomized manikin study
    Sonmez, Osman
    Colak, Nese
    Bayram, Basak
    Kara, Suleyman Gokhan
    Halac, Sebnem Sakar
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 24 (02): : 97 - 102
  • [30] Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    Kurowski, Andrzej
    Truszewski, Zenon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2015, 174 (10) : 1325 - 1332