Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1

被引:345
|
作者
Angelucci, Alessandra
Bressloff, Paul C.
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Moran Eye Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Math, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
extrastriate; geniculocortical; surround modulation; horizontal connections; striate cortex; macaque;
D O I
10.1016/S0079-6123(06)54005-1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A central question in visual neuroscience is what circuits generate the responses of neurons in the primary visual cortex (VI). VI neurons respond best to oriented stimuli of optimal size within their receptive field (RF) center. This size tuning is contrast dependent, i.e. a neuron's optimal stimulus size measured at high contrast (the high-contrast summation RF, or hsRF) is smaller than when measured using low-contrast stimuli (the low-contrast summation RF, or lsRF). Responses to stimuli in the RF center are usually suppressed by iso-oriented stimuli in the extra-classical RF surround. Iso-orientation surround suppression is fast and long range, extending well beyond the size of VI cells' lsRF. Geniculocortical feedforward (FF), VI lateral and extrastriate feedback (FB) connections to VI could all contribute to generating the RF center and surround of VI neurons. Studies on the spatio-temporal properties and functional organization of these connections can help disclose their specific contributions to the responses of VI cells. These studies, reviewed in this chapter, have shown that FF afferents to VI integrate signals within the hsRF of VI cells; VI lateral connections are commensurate with the size of the lsRF and may, thus, underlie contrast-dependent changes in spatial summation, and modulatory effects arising from the surround region closer to the RF center (the "near" surround). The spatial and temporal properties of lateral connections cannot account for the dimensions and onset latency of modulation arising from more distant regions of the surround (the "far" surround). Inter-areal FB connections to VI, instead, are commensurate with the full spatial range of center and surround responses, and show fast conduction velocity consistent with the short onset latency of modulation arising from the "far" surround. We review data showing that a subset of FB connections terminate in a patchy fashion in VI, and show modular and orientation specificity, consistent with their proposed role in orientation-specific center-surround interactions. We propose specific mechanisms by which each connection type contributes to the RF center and surround of VI neurons, and implement these hypotheses into a recurrent network model. We show physiological data in support of the model's predictions, revealing that modulation from the "far" surround is not always suppressive, but can be facilitatory under specific stimulus conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 120
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gain control from beyond the classical receptive field in primate primary visual cortex
    Webb, BS
    Tinsley, CJ
    Barraclough, NE
    Parker, A
    Derrington, AM
    VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 20 (03) : 221 - 230
  • [42] Contrast-dependent receptive-field center-surround interactions in V1 and V2 neurons of infant macaque monkeys
    Zheng, J
    Bi, H
    Watanabe, I
    Zhang, B
    Maruko, I
    Smith, EL
    Chino, YM
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [43] The spatial summation characteristics of three categories of V1 neurons differing in non-classical receptive field modulation properties
    Ke, C.
    Li, C-Y
    Xu, X-Z
    PERCEPTION, 2013, 42 : 146 - 146
  • [44] Spatial distribution of suppressive signals outside the classical receptive field in lateral geniculate nucleus
    Webb, BS
    Tinsley, CJ
    Vincent, CJ
    Derrington, AM
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 94 (03) : 1789 - 1797
  • [45] Delayed maturation of receptive-field center and surround in macaque V2 neurons
    Zhang, B
    Watanabe, I
    Bi, H
    Zheng, J
    Maruko, I
    Smith, EL
    Chino, YM
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [46] Transformation of Receptive Field Properties from Lateral Geniculate Nucleus to Superficial V1 in the Tree Shrew
    Van Hooser, Stephen D.
    Roy, Arani
    Rhodes, Heather J.
    Culp, Julie H.
    Fitzpatrick, David
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 33 (28): : 11494 - 11505
  • [47] Aspect Ratio of the Receptive Field Makes a Major Contribution to the Bandwidth of Orientation Selectivity in Cat V1
    Xu, Tao
    Li, Ming
    Chen, Ke
    Wang, Ling
    Yan, Hong-Mei
    ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS (V), 2016, : 133 - 142
  • [48] RECEPTIVE-FIELD CHARACTERISTICS IN V1 AND V2 OF THE CAT AND MONKEY
    KENNEDY, H
    MARTIN, KAC
    ORBAN, GA
    WHITTERIDGE, D
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1981, 319 (OCT): : P81 - P81
  • [49] Extraclassical receptive field phenomena and short-range connectivity in V1
    Wielaard, Jim
    Sajda, Paul
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2006, 16 (11) : 1531 - 1545
  • [50] Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of V1 neurons
    David, SV
    Vinje, WE
    Gallant, JL
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 24 (31): : 6991 - 7006