Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1

被引:345
|
作者
Angelucci, Alessandra
Bressloff, Paul C.
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Moran Eye Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Math, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
extrastriate; geniculocortical; surround modulation; horizontal connections; striate cortex; macaque;
D O I
10.1016/S0079-6123(06)54005-1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A central question in visual neuroscience is what circuits generate the responses of neurons in the primary visual cortex (VI). VI neurons respond best to oriented stimuli of optimal size within their receptive field (RF) center. This size tuning is contrast dependent, i.e. a neuron's optimal stimulus size measured at high contrast (the high-contrast summation RF, or hsRF) is smaller than when measured using low-contrast stimuli (the low-contrast summation RF, or lsRF). Responses to stimuli in the RF center are usually suppressed by iso-oriented stimuli in the extra-classical RF surround. Iso-orientation surround suppression is fast and long range, extending well beyond the size of VI cells' lsRF. Geniculocortical feedforward (FF), VI lateral and extrastriate feedback (FB) connections to VI could all contribute to generating the RF center and surround of VI neurons. Studies on the spatio-temporal properties and functional organization of these connections can help disclose their specific contributions to the responses of VI cells. These studies, reviewed in this chapter, have shown that FF afferents to VI integrate signals within the hsRF of VI cells; VI lateral connections are commensurate with the size of the lsRF and may, thus, underlie contrast-dependent changes in spatial summation, and modulatory effects arising from the surround region closer to the RF center (the "near" surround). The spatial and temporal properties of lateral connections cannot account for the dimensions and onset latency of modulation arising from more distant regions of the surround (the "far" surround). Inter-areal FB connections to VI, instead, are commensurate with the full spatial range of center and surround responses, and show fast conduction velocity consistent with the short onset latency of modulation arising from the "far" surround. We review data showing that a subset of FB connections terminate in a patchy fashion in VI, and show modular and orientation specificity, consistent with their proposed role in orientation-specific center-surround interactions. We propose specific mechanisms by which each connection type contributes to the RF center and surround of VI neurons, and implement these hypotheses into a recurrent network model. We show physiological data in support of the model's predictions, revealing that modulation from the "far" surround is not always suppressive, but can be facilitatory under specific stimulus conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 120
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamic functional connectivity among neuronal population during modulation of extra-classical receptive field in primary visual cortex
    Niu, Xiaoke
    Shi, Li
    Wan, Hong
    Wang, Zhizhong
    Shang, Zhigang
    Li, Zhihui
    BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2015, 117 : 45 - 53
  • [32] Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons
    Cavanaugh, JR
    Bair, W
    Movshon, JA
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 88 (05) : 2547 - 2556
  • [33] Temporal-frequency dependency of receptive field size and surround suppression in LGN and V1
    Sadakane, Osamu
    Naito, Tomoyuki
    Osaki, Hironobu
    Okamoto, Masahiro
    Sato, Hiromichi
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2006, 55 : S70 - S70
  • [34] Spatial-frequency dependency of receptive field size and surround suppression in LGN and V1
    Osaki, Hironobu
    Naito, Tomoyuki
    Sadakane, Osamu
    Okamoto, Masahiro
    Sato, Hiromichi
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2006, 55 : S221 - S221
  • [35] Increased stimulation of the non-classical receptive field region results in more information in occluded V1
    Revina, Yulia
    Petro, Lucy S.
    Denk-Florea, Cristina
    Muckli, Lars
    PERCEPTION, 2015, 44 : 370 - 370
  • [36] Delayed maturation of receptive field center/surround mechanisms in V2
    Zhang, B
    Zheng, JH
    Watanabe, I
    Maruko, I
    Bi, H
    Smith, EL
    Chino, Y
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (16) : 5862 - 5867
  • [37] Correlations in V1 Are Reduced by Stimulation Outside the Receptive Field
    Snyder, Adam C.
    Morais, Michael J.
    Kohn, Adam
    Smith, Matthew A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 34 (34): : 11222 - 11227
  • [38] Learning receptive field properties of complex cells in V1
    Lian, Yanbo
    Almasi, Ali
    Grayden, David B.
    Kameneva, Tatiana
    Burkitt, Anthony N.
    Meffin, Hamish
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 17 (03)
  • [39] Reaching beyond the classical receptive field of VI neurons: horizontal or feedback axons?
    Angelucci, A
    Bullier, J
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS, 2003, 97 (2-3) : 141 - 154
  • [40] Form representation via center-surround organizations of V1 neurons revealed by high-order receptive field analysis
    Tanaka, Hiroki
    Ohzawa, Izumi
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2007, 58 : S36 - S36