Age-stratified outcome of a genotype-guided dosing algorithm for acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon

被引:5
|
作者
Zhang, Y. [1 ]
de Boer, A. [1 ]
Verhoef, T. I. [2 ]
van der Meer, F. J. M. [3 ]
Le Cessie, S. [4 ,5 ]
Manolopoulos, V. G. [6 ,7 ]
Maitland-van der Zee, A. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Clin Pharmacol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Thrombosis & Hemostasis, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Med Stat & Bioinformat, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Acad Gen Hosp Evros, Clin Pharmacol Unit, Alexandroupolis, Greece
[7] Democritus Univ Thrace, Sch Med, Pharmacol Lab, Alexandroupolis, Greece
关键词
age groups; algorithms; coumarins; cytochrome P450 2C9; pharmacogenetics; vitamin K epoxide reductases; ORAL ANTICOAGULANT-THERAPY; PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; WARFARIN; OVERANTICOAGULATION; PHARMACOKINETICS; DRUG; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/jth.13601
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Age seemed to affect the interaction between coumarins and genotype in the acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon arm of the European Pharmacogenetics of Anticoagulant Therapy (EU-PACT) trial. Objectives To investigate the effect of genotype-guided dosing stratified by age and the potential factors causing a difference. Patients/Methods Data from the acenocoumarol/phenprocoumon arm of the EU-PACT trial were used. The percentages of time below the therapeutic range, time above the therapeutic range and time in the therapeutic range (TTR) during the initial 12 weeks of therapy were compared between the genotype-guided group and the control group among younger (< 75 years) and older ( 75 years) patients by the use of independent t-tests, and adjusted for sex, height, weight and co-medications by the use of linear regression. Results Among younger phenprocoumon users, TTR during the first 12 weeks in the genotype-guided group (n = 55) was 9.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 17.8) higher than in the control group (n = 63), with a remarkably lower percentage of time above this range (difference: - 9.6%, 95% CI - 19.0 to - 0.2) and a similar time below this range. Older patients dosed by the genotype-guided algorithm (n = 24) spent more time above the range (difference: 27.5%, 95% CI 12.9 to 42.0). For acenocoumarol users, there were no significant differences between the genotype-guided and control groups for most outcomes, except for a lower percentage of time below the range among older patients. Conclusions The genotype-guided algorithm for phenprocoumon in the EU-PACT trial benefitted younger patients more, but for older patients the algorithm needs to be revised and tested in further research.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 464
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Cost-Effectiveness of Genotype-Guided Warfarin Dosing for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
    Patrick, Amanda R.
    Avorn, Jerry
    Choudhry, Niteesh K.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2009, 18 : S23 - S24
  • [32] Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of genotype-guided pharmacogenetic dosing of warfarin
    Xu, Haiyan
    Xie, Xiongwei
    Wang, Bingjian
    Chen, Yu
    Meng, Tao
    Ma, Shuren
    Wang, Fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 177 (02) : 654 - 657
  • [33] GENETIC ASSOCIATIONS WITH WARFARIN RESPONSE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING GENOTYPE-GUIDED DOSING.
    Drozda, K.
    Lee, Y.
    Patel, S. R.
    Lee, J.
    Pugach, O.
    Duarte, J. D.
    Nutescu, E. A.
    Cavallari, L. H.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 97 : S26 - S26
  • [34] A Pilot Trial of Genotype-Guided Dosing versus Standard Clinical Dosing in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplants
    Min, S.
    Daljevic, T.
    Lafreniere-Roula, M.
    Manlhiot, C.
    Nalli, N.
    Grasemann, H.
    Schwartz, S.
    Kamath, B.
    Ng, V.
    Parekh, R.
    Mital, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 : 649 - 649
  • [35] Warfarin Dosing According to the Genotype-guided Algorithm is Most Beneficial in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Parallel Group Trial
    Makar-Ausperger, Ksenija
    Krzelj, Kristina
    Bencic, Martina Lovric
    Aumiler, Matea Raddcic
    Turk, Viktorija Erdeljic
    Bozina, Nada
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2018, 40 (03) : 362 - 368
  • [36] Genotype-guided warfarin dosing: Correlation of two multivariate dose estimation models.
    Reynolds, K. K.
    Hartung, B. R.
    Valdes, R.
    Linder, M. W.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 53 (06) : A102 - A102
  • [37] A meta-analysis of randomized trials of genotype-guided versus standard dosing of warfarin
    Dahal, K.
    Sharma, S.
    Lee, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 381 - 382
  • [38] Genotype-Guided Dosing Study of FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Toffoli, Giuseppe
    Sharma, Manish R.
    Marangon, Elena
    Posocco, Bianca
    Gray, Elizabeth
    Mai, Quan
    Buonadonna, Angela
    Polite, Blase N.
    Miolo, Gianmaria
    Tabaro, Gianna
    Innocenti, Federico
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (04) : 918 - 924
  • [39] Genotype-Guided Dosing of Coumarin Anticoagulants: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Tang, Tao
    Liu, Jie
    Zuo, Keqiang
    Cheng, Jie
    Chen, Linyin
    Lu, Chenhui
    Han, Shilong
    Xu, Jichong
    Jia, Zhongzhi
    Ye, Meng
    Pei, Erli
    Zhang, Xiaoping
    Li, Maoquan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 20 (04) : 387 - 394
  • [40] Meta-Analysis of Genotype-Guided Versus Standard Dosing of Vitamin K Antagonists
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Abdalla, Ahmed
    Haykal, Tarek
    Osman, Mohammed
    Ahmed, Sahar
    Hassan, Mustafa
    Bachuwa, Ghassan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 121 (07): : 879 - 887