Genotype-Guided Dosing of Coumarin Anticoagulants: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:18
|
作者
Tang, Tao [1 ]
Liu, Jie [1 ]
Zuo, Keqiang [1 ]
Cheng, Jie [1 ]
Chen, Linyin [2 ]
Lu, Chenhui [1 ]
Han, Shilong [1 ]
Xu, Jichong [1 ]
Jia, Zhongzhi [1 ]
Ye, Meng [1 ]
Pei, Erli [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoping [1 ,3 ]
Li, Maoquan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Dept Intervent & Vasc Surg, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Tai Zhou Hosp Zhejiang Prov, Dept Ophthalmol, Taizhou, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Inst Intervent Vessel, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
genotype guided; anticoagulation; coumarin; meta-analysis; GENETIC-VARIANTS; CYP2C9; GENOTYPE; PILOT TRIAL; WARFARIN; PHARMACOGENETICS; VKORC1; ASSOCIATION; ALGORITHMS; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1177/1074248414565666
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Coumarin anticoagulants (acenocoumarol, phenprocoumon, and warfarin) are generally used for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation or for the therapy and prevention of venous thromboembolism. However, the safe use of coumarin anticoagulants is restricted by a narrow therapeutic window and large interindividual dosing variations. Some studies found that the effectiveness and safety of coumarin anticoagulants therapy were increased by pharmacogenetic-guided dosing algorithms, while others found no significant effect of genotype-guided therapy. Methods: Four electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to March 1, 2014, for randomized controlled trials of patients who received coumarin anticoagulants according to genotype-guided dosing algorithms. The primary outcome was the percentage of time that the international normalized ratio (INR) was within the normal range (2.0-3.0). Secondary outcomes included major bleeding events, thromboembolic events, and INR 4 events. Results: Eight studies satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Genotype-guided dosing of coumarin anticoagulants improved the percentage of time within the therapeutic INR range (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.28; P = .02; I-2 = 70%). Subgroup analysis was performed after dividing the nongenotype-guided group into a standard-dose group (95% CI, 0.14-0.49; P = .0004; I-2 = 50%) and a clinical variables-guided dosing algorithm group (95% CI, -0.07-0.15; P = .48; I-2 = 34%). There is a statistically significant reduction in numbers of secondary outcomes (INR 4 events, major bleeding events, and thromboembolic events; 95% CI, 0.79-1.00; P = .04). Subgroup analysis of secondary outcomes showed no significant difference between genotype-guided dosing and clinical variables-guided dosing (95% CI, 0.84-1.10; P = .57; I-2 = 11%), but genotype-guided dosing reduced secondary outcomes compared with standard dosing (95% CI, 0.62-0.92; P = .006; I-2 = 0%). Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that genotype-guided dosing increased the effectiveness and safety of coumarin therapy compared with standard dosing but did not have advantages compared with clinical variables-guided dosing.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 394
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Genotype-Guided vs Standard Dosing of Warfarin
    Dahal, Khagendra
    Sharma, Sharan P.
    Fung, Erik
    Lee, Juyong
    Moore, Jason H.
    Unterborn, John N.
    Williams, Scott M.
    CHEST, 2015, 148 (03) : 701 - 710
  • [2] Genotype-guided dosing versus conventional dosing of warfarin: A meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials
    Yang, Ting
    Zhou, Ying
    Chen, Chaoyang
    Lu, Min
    Ma, Lingyue
    Cui, Yimin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 44 (02) : 197 - 208
  • [3] A meta-analysis of randomized trials of genotype-guided versus standard dosing of warfarin
    Dahal, K.
    Sharma, S.
    Lee, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 381 - 382
  • [4] Efficacy and Safety of Genotype-Guided Warfarin Dosing in the Chinese Population: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wang, Feifei
    Guo, Jun
    Zhang, Aidong
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 73 (03) : 127 - 135
  • [5] Genotype-guided warfarin dosing vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tse, Gary
    Gong, Mengqi
    Li, Guangping
    Wong, Sunny Hei
    Wu, William K. K.
    Wong, Wing Tak
    Roever, Leonardo
    Lee, Alex Pui Wai
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Liu, Tong
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 84 (09) : 1868 - 1882
  • [6] Genotype-Guided vs Clinical Dosing of Warfarin and Its Analogues Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Stergiopoulos, Kathleen
    Brown, David L.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (08) : 1330 - 1338
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of genotype-guided warfarin dosing versus non-genotype-guided warfarin dosing strategies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Xinrui
    Tang, Borui
    Zhou, Meng
    Liu, Lihong
    Feng, Xin
    Wang, Xin
    Qiu, Kui
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2022, 210 : 42 - 52
  • [8] Genotype-guided drug prescribing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials
    Goulding, Rebecca
    Dawes, Diana
    Price, Morgan
    Wilkie, Sabrina
    Dawes, Martin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 80 (04) : 868 - 877
  • [9] Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of genotype-guided pharmacogenetic dosing of warfarin
    Xu, Haiyan
    Xie, Xiongwei
    Wang, Bingjian
    Chen, Yu
    Meng, Tao
    Ma, Shuren
    Wang, Fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 177 (02) : 654 - 657
  • [10] Limited clinical utility of genotype-guided warfarin initiation dosing algorithms versus standard therapy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials
    Tang, H. L.
    Shi, W. L.
    Li, X. G.
    Zhang, T.
    Zhai, S. D.
    Xie, H. G.
    PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (06): : 496 - 504