Before and after the Chinese gene-edited human babies: Multiple discourses of gene editing on social media

被引:18
|
作者
Zhang, Xing [1 ]
Chen, Anfan [2 ]
Zhang, Weiyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Commun & New Media, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Dept Sci Commun & Sci Educ, Hefei, Peoples R China
关键词
discourse; emotion; gene editing; public engagement with science; scientific crisis; social media;
D O I
10.1177/0963662520987754
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study examines discourses in Chinese online discussions of gene editing by multiple social actors on Weibo before and after a significant scientific crisis, the 2018 scandal of Chinese gene-edited human babies. A content analysis of 2074 posts was done to identify frames, emotions, and metaphors. Findings reveal that Chinese social media have opened up new spaces for multiple social actors to generate multiple discourses. This has resulted in a more participatory public engagement with science and technology on Chinese social media, potentially influencing the online agenda and policy decisions on science and technology. Finally, findings indicate that a scientific crisis can serve as a trigger for significant changes in public attitudes and opinions regarding gene editing.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 587
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Chinese model for legal regulation of Gene-Edited endangered animals and plants
    Li, Tao
    GENE, 2024, 911
  • [22] YouTube Comments on Gene-Edited Babies: What Factors Affect Diverse Opinions in Comments?
    Ji, Jiaojiao
    Hu, Hongchao
    Wei, Shitong
    SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2023, 41 (04) : 1420 - 1437
  • [23] Chinese Academy of Engineering calls for actions on the birth of gene-edited infants
    Zhang, Boli
    Chen, Zuoning
    Yi, Jian
    Tang, Haiying
    Wang, Chen
    LANCET, 2019, 393 (10166): : 25 - 25
  • [24] The Gene-Edited Babies Controversy in China: Field Philosophical (October, 10.1080/02691728.2020.1752842, 2020)
    Yan, P.
    Mitcham, C.
    SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2021, 35 (04) : 426 - 426
  • [25] First gene-edited babies born, scientist claims Scientists and ethicists broadly criticize experiment
    Cross, Ryan
    Mullin, Rick
    Satyanarayana, Megha
    Tremblay, Jean-Francois
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2018, 96 (48) : 6 - 7
  • [26] Experiments that led to the first gene-edited babies: the ethical failings and the urgent need for better governance
    Li, Jing-ru
    Walker, Simon
    Nie, Jing-bao
    Zhang, Xin-qing
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2019, 20 (01): : 32 - 38
  • [27] Airway Disease Modeling with Gene-Edited Human Basal Cell Transplantation
    Berical, Andrew C.
    Kiyokawa, Hirofumi
    Beermann, Mary Lou
    Wallman, Daniel
    Cherfane, Gabrielle
    Dunphy, Victoria
    Pan, Jiehong
    Tilston-Lunel, Andrew
    Varelas, Xaralabos
    Horani, Amjad
    Brody, Steven L.
    Kotton, Darrell N.
    Hawkins, Finn J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2025, 211 (01) : 131 - 134
  • [28] The biological feasibility and social context of gene-edited, caffeine-free coffee
    Nils V. Leibrock
    Joris Santegoets
    Paul J. W. Mooijman
    Filemon Yusuf
    Xander C. L. Zuijdgeest
    Esmée A. Zutt
    Josette G. M. Jacobs
    Jan G. Schaart
    Food Science and Biotechnology, 2022, 31 : 635 - 655
  • [29] The biological feasibility and social context of gene-edited, caffeine-free coffee
    Leibrock, Nils V.
    Santegoets, Joris
    Mooijman, Paul J. W.
    Yusuf, Filemon
    Zuijdgeest, Xander C. L.
    Zutt, Esmee A.
    Jacobs, Josette G. M.
    Schaart, Jan G.
    FOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 31 (06) : 635 - 655
  • [30] SAFER-Detection for Efficient Interrogation of Rearrangements in Gene-Edited Human Cells
    Yu, Hongyao
    Shankaracharya, Shankar
    Petroni, Ricardo
    Vemulapalli, Vijetha
    Smith, Douglas R.
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2024, 32 (04) : 792 - 792