Need for cognitive closure and attention allocation during multitasking: Evidence from eye-tracking studies

被引:8
|
作者
Szumowska, Ewa [1 ]
Kossowska, Malgorzata [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Psychol, Ingardena Str 6, PL-30060 Krakow, Poland
关键词
Need for closure; Attention; Multitasking; Divided attention; Eye-tracking; Focused and distributed attention; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SUBCORTICAL CONTRIBUTIONS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; DEFOCUSED ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; POLYCHRONICITY; PERSONALITY; INHIBITION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.014
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In two studies, we examine how need for cognitive closure (NFC), referring to an individual's tendency to reduce uncertainty via rigid processing style, relates to the way attentional resources are distributed while multitasking. Previous studies show that NFC is related to focused, rather than distributed, attention. High NFC individuals should thus process tasks serially rather than in parallel. That is, in order to maintain performance on an additional task, they would need to shift attentional focus to this task more often. Low NFC individuals, on the other hand, should be able to process both tasks in parallel, i.e. they would maintain performance on the additional task with fewer attentional shifts. To test our hypotheses, we asked participants to perform a main and additional task simultaneously. During task performance participants' eyes were tracked. In line with our predictions, the interest area analysis showed that NFC was related to more fixations and longer dwell time on the additional task. It was also associated with more runs to this task (Studies 1 and 2). The effects were stronger in difficult, compared to easy, condition (Study 2). The paper is the first one to directly test attention allocation during multitasking depending on NFC levels. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 280
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] More Attention to Attention? An Eye-Tracking Investigation of Selection of Perceptual Attributes During a Task Switch
    Longman, Cai S.
    Lavric, Aureliu
    Monsell, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2013, 39 (04) : 1142 - 1151
  • [42] Decoding Fan Engagement: An Eye-Tracking Analysis of Attention Allocation on Sport Teams' Facebook Pages
    Kim, Yongjae
    Lee, Seungbum
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT COMMUNICATION, 2025,
  • [43] The Mental Lexicon Is Fully Specified: Evidence From Eye-Tracking
    Mitterer, Holger
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2011, 37 (02) : 496 - 513
  • [44] Thematic processing of adjuncts: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment
    Simon P. Liversedge
    Martin J. Pickering
    Emma L. Clayes
    Holly P. Branigan
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2003, 10 : 667 - 675
  • [45] Processing metalinguistic negation: Evidence from eye-tracking experiments
    Noh, Eun-Ju
    Choo, Hyeree
    Koh, Sungryong
    JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2013, 57 : 1 - 18
  • [46] Thematic processing of adjuncts: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment
    Liversedge, SP
    Pickering, MJ
    Clayes, EL
    Branigan, HP
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (03) : 667 - 675
  • [47] A pupil size, eye-tracking and neuropsychological dataset from ADHD children during a cognitive task
    Daniel Rojas-Líbano
    Gabriel Wainstein
    Ximena Carrasco
    Francisco Aboitiz
    Nicolás Crossley
    Tomás Ossandón
    Scientific Data, 6
  • [48] A pupil size, eye-tracking and neuropsychological dataset from ADHD children during a cognitive task
    Rojas-Libano, Daniel
    Wainstein, Gabriel
    Carrasco, Ximena
    Aboitiz, Francisco
    Crossley, Nicolas
    Ossandon, Tomas
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2019, 6 (1)
  • [49] An Eye-Tracking Study of Sketch Processing: Evidence From Russian
    Petrova, Tatiana E.
    Riekhakaynen, Elena, I
    Bratash, Valentina S.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [50] Universality in reading processes: Evidence from an eye-tracking study
    Matsunaga, S
    PSYCHOLOGIA, 1999, 42 (04) : 290 - 306