Need for cognitive closure and attention allocation during multitasking: Evidence from eye-tracking studies

被引:8
|
作者
Szumowska, Ewa [1 ]
Kossowska, Malgorzata [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Psychol, Ingardena Str 6, PL-30060 Krakow, Poland
关键词
Need for closure; Attention; Multitasking; Divided attention; Eye-tracking; Focused and distributed attention; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SUBCORTICAL CONTRIBUTIONS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; DEFOCUSED ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; POLYCHRONICITY; PERSONALITY; INHIBITION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.014
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In two studies, we examine how need for cognitive closure (NFC), referring to an individual's tendency to reduce uncertainty via rigid processing style, relates to the way attentional resources are distributed while multitasking. Previous studies show that NFC is related to focused, rather than distributed, attention. High NFC individuals should thus process tasks serially rather than in parallel. That is, in order to maintain performance on an additional task, they would need to shift attentional focus to this task more often. Low NFC individuals, on the other hand, should be able to process both tasks in parallel, i.e. they would maintain performance on the additional task with fewer attentional shifts. To test our hypotheses, we asked participants to perform a main and additional task simultaneously. During task performance participants' eyes were tracked. In line with our predictions, the interest area analysis showed that NFC was related to more fixations and longer dwell time on the additional task. It was also associated with more runs to this task (Studies 1 and 2). The effects were stronger in difficult, compared to easy, condition (Study 2). The paper is the first one to directly test attention allocation during multitasking depending on NFC levels. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 280
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Attention biases the process of risky decision-making: Evidence from eye-tracking
    Hu, Mengchen
    Chang, Ruosong
    Sui, Xue
    Gao, Min
    PSYCH JOURNAL, 2024, 13 (02) : 157 - 165
  • [22] Eye-tracking indices of attention allocation and attention bias variability are differently related to trauma exposure and PTSD
    Alon, Yaron
    Bar-Haim, Yair
    Dykan, Chelsea Dyan Gober
    Suarez-Jimenez, Benjamin
    Zhu, Xi
    Neria, Yuval
    Lazarov, Amit
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2023, 96
  • [23] The Disengagement of Visual Attention: An Eye-Tracking Study of Cognitive Impairment, Ethnicity and Age
    Polden, Megan
    Wilcockson, Thomas D. W.
    Crawford, Trevor J.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (07) : 1 - 13
  • [24] Visual Attention and Cognitive Archaeology: An Eye-Tracking Study of Palaeolithic Stone Tools
    Silva-Gago, Maria
    Ioannidou, Flora
    Fedato, Annapaola
    Hodgson, Timothy
    Bruner, Emiliano
    PERCEPTION, 2022, 51 (01) : 3 - 24
  • [25] Tastiness but not healthfulness captures automatic visual attention: Preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study
    Motoki, Kosuke
    Saito, Toshiki
    Nouchi, Rui
    Kawashima, Ryuta
    Sugiura, Motoaki
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2018, 64 : 148 - 153
  • [26] The impact of visual sexual appeals on attention allocation within advertisements: an eye-tracking study
    Cummins, R. Glenn
    Gong, Zijian Harrison
    Reichert, Tom
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2021, 40 (05) : 708 - 732
  • [27] Monolingual and bilingual infants' attention to talking faces: evidence from eye-tracking and Bayesian modeling
    Lemonnier, Sophie
    Fayolle, Benjamin
    Sebastian-Galles, Nuria
    Bremond, Roland
    Diard, Julien
    Fort, Mathilde
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [28] Adaptive processing of fractions - Evidence from eye-tracking
    Huber, S.
    Moeller, K.
    Nuerk, H-C.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 148 : 37 - 48
  • [29] Processing adjectives in development: Evidence from eye-tracking
    Redolfi, Michela
    Melloni, Chiara
    JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 2024,
  • [30] Attention Allocation in ASD: a Review and Meta-analysis of Eye-Tracking Studies (vol 3, pg 209, 2016)
    Chita-Tegmark, Meia
    REVIEW JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2016, 3 (04) : 400 - 400