Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: A randomized clinical trial

被引:104
|
作者
Benassi, L [1 ]
Rossi, T [1 ]
Kaihura, CT [1 ]
Ricci, L [1 ]
Bedocchi, L [1 ]
Galanti, B [1 ]
Vadora, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Neonatol, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
fibroid tumor; enlarged uteri; vaginal hysterectomy;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.127596
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes in patients who undergo vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for enlarged symptomatic uteri. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective, randomized study, 60 vaginal hysterectomies (study group) were compared with 59 abdominal hysterectomies (control group); all of the hysterectomies were performed for symptomatic uterine fibroids from January 1997 through December 2000. We excluded from the study the other common causes of hysterectomy such as prolapse, bleeding, adenomyosis, and endometrial or cervical carcinoma. In both groups, uterine weights ranged from 200 g to 1300 g. For enlarged uteri, vaginal hysterectomies were performed with the use of volume reduction techniques: intramyometrial coring, corporal bisection, and morcellation. The evaluated parameters included patient age, weight, parity, uterine weight, operative time, blood loss, demand for analgesics, eventual surgical complications, length of admission, and hospital charges. The Mann-Whitney U test and chi(2) tests were applied for statistical analysis. Probability values of <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no major differences in patient age, weight, parity, and uterine weight between-the two groups. Operative time was significantly lower for the vaginal route as compared with the abdominal route (86 minutes vs 102 minutes, P < .001). No intraoperative complications were noted both in the study and control groups or the control group. Surgical bleeding (expressed by hemoglobin loss) was not significantly different between the two groups. In the postoperative period, we found a higher incidence of fever (30.5% vs 16.6%, P < .05) and demand for analgesics (86% vs 66%, P < .05) in the abdominal group as compared with the vaginal group. Significant advantages of vaginal hysterectomy were a reduction in the hospital stay (3 days vs 4 days, P < .001) and cost. CONCLUSION: These results should lead to the choice of vaginal hysterectomy as a valid alternative to the abdominal hysterectomy, even for enlarged uteri.
引用
收藏
页码:1561 / 1565
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial
    Ihab Serag Allam
    Ahmed Khairy Makled
    Ihab Adel Gomaa
    Gasser Mohammad El Bishry
    Hassan Awwad Bayoumy
    Doaa Fouad Ali
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 1341 - 1345
  • [32] VAGINAL OR ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY
    BOSSERT, LJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1965, 192 (06): : 580 - &
  • [33] Transvaginal hysterectomy or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for nonprolapsed uteri
    Chang, WC
    Huang, SC
    Sheu, BC
    Chen, CL
    Torng, PL
    Hsu, WC
    Chang, DY
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (02): : 321 - 326
  • [34] EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy
    Garry, R
    Fountain, J
    Brown, J
    Manca, A
    Mason, S
    Sculpher, M
    Napp, V
    Bridgman, S
    Gray, J
    Lilford, R
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2004, 8 (26) : 1 - +
  • [35] To peritonealize or not to peritonealize? A randomized trial at abdominal hysterectomy
    Gupta, JK
    Dinas, K
    Khan, KS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 178 (04) : 796 - 800
  • [36] RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF SHORT-TERM ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN 750 PATIENTS UNDERGOING VAGINAL AND ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY
    FERRARI, A
    BACCOLO, M
    PRIVITERA, G
    ORTISI, G
    SARTOR, V
    GRITTI, P
    BONGETTA, R
    MORONI, M
    MANGIONI, C
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 1984, 69 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [37] VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR TREATMENT OF CANCER OF CORPUS UTERI
    INGIULLA, W
    COSMI, EV
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1968, 100 (04) : 541 - &
  • [38] Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy
    Doucette, RC
    Scott, JR
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 41 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [39] CLINICAL AND FINANCIAL ANALYSES OF LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY
    HIDLEBAUGH, D
    OMARA, P
    CONBOY, E
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1994, 1 (04): : 357 - 361
  • [40] Postoperative complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy for uteri weighing 250 grams or less
    Mou, Tsung
    Brown, Oluwateniola
    Das, Deepanjana
    Mueller, Margaret G.
    Kenton, Kimberly S.
    Bretschneider, Carol Emi
    GYNECOLOGY AND PELVIC MEDICINE, 2023, 6